Sandals white house

[Don1]

What utter nonsense..

Agree..that's your typical contribution.

You can sell a Brand without selling your business..conversely you can sell your business and keep your Brand.. independent concepts..

Branding is business...period. The fact that it can be sold means... wow!....it's business related 100%.
In fact it is reflected on the Balance Sheet...within an intangible asset class called Goodwill.

What you are unable to say coherently is: brands or branding is an intangible asset... as opposed to other real or tangible asset classes.

Stick to govament wuk an leave bizniz to bizniz people.

Butch Stewart has engaged in buying political favor in the normal course of doing business in Jamaica.

My point exactly...glad you see the light.

This is the first time he has engaged in a manner that has direct implications to his Brand.

An irrelevance...he has routinely made deals with governments....especially of the PNP variety. Taking over government owned hotels in sweetheart backroom deals and REBRANDING the properties.
This stuff only became controversial because of the incompetence or greed of either or both sides...and the consequent politicized fallout.

Sandals Whitehouse only so called "affects his brand" because it became a political issue re overruns.... which political issue he promoted heavily in the Jamaica Observer...sarry.. The Sandals Newletter.


As I said stick to govament wuk... "some of us finding solutions on the ground...etc"


Ah hope yuh fine di salution b4 it fine yuh. LOL!!

[Muadib]

What you call an irrelevance speaks directly to issue.

Your rebranding statement while interesting is actually what is irrelevant here as it bears no relation to the circumstance.

The politically tainted product produced actually compromised the Brand which is COUNTER to Butch strategy which is to raise value using his BRAND..

Butch should have stuck to paying the whore.. not marrying it...

I am sure he has learned... I don't think we can say the same for you..

LOL !

[Don1]

What you call an irrelevance speaks directly to issue.

Your rebranding statement while interesting is actually what is irrelevant here as it bears no relation to the circumstance.

The politically tainted product produced actually compromised the Brand which is COUNTER to Butch strategy which is to raise value using his BRAND..

Butch should have stuck to paying the whore.. not marrying it...

I am sure he has learned... I don't think we can say the same for you..

LOL !

Very naive.

Stewart himself created the political taint... through a relentless campaign in his compliant mouthpiece... the prostitute called the Jamaica Observer. AKA The Sandals Newsletter.

Your argument has zero merit...and makes even less sense.

However ..it shows progress that you have abandoned your ridiculous position on branding being separate from business.

Congrats.

[Muadib]

Pearls cast before swine... swine with an axe to grind no less !..

My bad.. carry on swilling in that mud.

LOL !

[Don1]

Pearls cast before swine... swine with an axe to grind no less !..

My bad.. carry on swilling in that mud.

LOL !

When defeated in argument...turn to bad poetry.

[Muadib]

Defeated ?

Lol !

I only believe in carrying the horse to water.. Drink or die of dehydration

My job is done.



Carry on...

[Sickko]

well funded????

[Don1]

well funded????

ah wha.. it nah reach yuh??

[Don1]

Defeated ?

Lol !

I only believe in carrying the horse to water.. Drink or die of dehydration

My job is done.



Carry on...

ok........