Originally posted by Maudib
View Post
RBSC
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Willi? ...and others who have been to this part of Germany?
Collapse
X
-
Where does it say that the bridge water is not enclosed ??
In anycase that is irrelevant to what weight the bridge has to support
At at point time (t) the bridge contains X tons of water and X tons of Ships.
That bridge better be able to support X tons of Water + X tons of Ship oddawise dawg nyam yuh suppah...
To bring it down to your level, pretend that the Ice-Man froze the water inna di bridge an any point in time.. what weight is the bridge supporting ?
Before yuh continue, yuh haffi state wha high school yuh did guh...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Maudib View PostWhere does it say that the bridge water is not enclosed ??
Comment
-
River ?
Where does it say it is a River ???
Yuh can read ?
Beyond that I don't even see the relevance, displacement takes time to spread.. in any time (t) which can be measured in milliseconds you will have to account for the mass at a point (x) and the gravity acting on it..
What happen.. di Engineers nuh believe ship can sink ?
Unnuh muss work fi NWA...
LOL !
Comment
-
This has nothing to do with water displacement.
Water can be displaced in a bucket.
The only way for this to work is if the water displaced is removed from the bridge, the level of water in the 'bridge' must not change...
Additionally if a ship sinks the water level has to drop to account for this..
Yuh have eediat ah talk about astronaught practising in pool.. apparantly they are weightless.. tell that to the pool support structure...
LOL !
Comment
-
The conclusion does not need to wait on Karl.
If the design is able to maintain a constant level of water when ships are traversing the designers do not have to account for the ship or cargo weight in the load bearing structural design.
If the design is not able to remove the displaced water to maintain a constant level then you have to account for the weight of the ship and cargo and water.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Maudib View PostThe conclusion does not need to wait on Karl.
If the design is able to maintain a constant level of water when ships are traversing the designers do not have to account for the ship or cargo weight in the load bearing structural design.
If the design is not able to remove the displaced water to maintain a constant level then you have to account for the weight of the ship and cargo and water.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Peter R View PostThat was a question (or one very much like it) in my first form Physics book! That I could answer but I think standing back and reading this thread is more than enough entertainment for one evening...who need TV??
Wondah which form dem start Physics at Campion ??
Comment
-
Originally posted by Maudib View PostWhere does it say that the bridge water is not enclosed ??
In anycase that is irrelevant to what weight the bridge has to support
At at point time (t) the bridge contains X tons of water and X tons of Ships.
That bridge better be able to support X tons of Water + X tons of Ship oddawise dawg nyam yuh suppah...
To bring it down to your level, pretend that the Ice-Man froze the water inna di bridge an any point in time.. what weight is the bridge supporting ?
Before yuh continue, yuh haffi state wha high school yuh did guh...
This is a channel-bridge over the River Elbe and joins the former East and West Germany"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."
Comment
Comment