RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Disrespecting Shearer, forgetting history

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Disrespecting Shearer, forgetting history

    Published: Sunday | May 24, 2009



    Kevin O'Brien Chang
    When the $1,000 bill with Michael Manley's portrait was put into circulation, no one objected. So why the protests about putting Hugh Shearer on the new $5,000 note? He is just as worthy as Alexander Bustamante, Norman Manley, Donald Sangster, and Michael Manley. To argue otherwise is ignorant disrespect of a great Jamaican.

    My July 8, 2004 Sunday Gleaner article, 'Hugh Shearer - Jamaica's greatest prime minister?' statistically analysed each prime ministerial regime using four measures - life expectancy, literacy rate, GDP per capita and murder rate per capita. The numbers ranked Hugh Shearer (1968-72) Jamaica's most effective prime minister, followed by Edward Seaga (1981-89), Alexander Bustamante/Donald Sangster (1962-7), the 1990s' Michael Manley (1990-1992), P.J. Patterson (1993-2002) and the 1970s' Michael Manley (1973-1980).

    Shearer's was the only administration where Jamaica did better than the global norm, while we suffered our largest relative decline under the 1970s' Manley. Life expectancy and literacy rates changed at similar rates during both regimes. For 1968-1972, our annual GDP growth rate was 3.5 per cent greater than the world average, and our murder rate increase per annum was .2 per cent less than in the US. For 1973-1980, our annual GDP growth rate was six per cent less than the world average, and our murder rate increase per annum was 9.1 per cent more than in the US.

    Numbers may not tell the whole story, but they speak without bias. Sources and methodology are outlined in the aforementioned article.

    First UN address


    Prime Minister Hugh Shearer at a sugar industry meeting at Petersfield Primary School, Westmoreland in 1969. - File

    On October 8, 1962, Hugh Shearer delivered Jamaica's first United Nations address, calling for an international year of human rights.

    To quote from Hartley Neita's Hugh Shearer: A Voice for the People:

    "It was, and still is, customary at the United Nations for addresses by the representatives of governments to be given generous applause. But as Shearer ... walked from the podium ... the applause which began as a polite exercise slowly increased in tempo and decibels as the tremendous significance of the proposal for a celebration of human rights registered ... delegates left their seats to crowd the Jamaican delegation and Shearer, genuinely congratulating him on his presentation and promising support for the extraordinary, and possibly controversial, proposal on human rights." A year later the UN designated 1968 the International Year of Human Rights. [1] In terms of actual results, this was probably the most important UN speech ever made by a Jamaican.

    Race



    NEITA

    Hugh Shearer had also previously urged then Prime Minister Bustamante to appoint the black former school teacher Clifford Campbell as the first Jamaican governor general, when others had been recommending someone from the light-skinned elite. [2]

    Here is Neita again:

    "In the public and private sectors, the senior posts were held by men who were caucasian and white, or what was defined as brown. In the banks, airlines and major companies, the staff was also of a similar colour, except for the messengers and cleaning staff who were all black ...

    "Shearer was very aware of these distinctions and prejudices which flowed from them. In labour negotiations, the chairmen, managing directors, personnel managers, accountants and lawyers of companies who sat across the conference tables from him were from the white upper stratum of the society. The thousands for whom he argued - the factory workers, drivers, barmaids, cane-cutters, and shop assistants - were black. Obtaining facilities for them at the workplace, such as showers and canteens, was, as we Jamaicans would say, "as hard as pulling teeth".

    So to have a black person living in the State house of the country was a powerful symbol of change." [3]

    Hugh Shearer was a pioneering trade unionist, who won many improvements for workers in the areas of wages, living conditions, pension rights, working hours, maternity leave, and health and education benefits. He was renowned for his mastery of the facts during negotiations.

    "The upcoming mathematical wizard was to strike terror in the hearts of the many bigwig employers with their "cook and book" exposition of income and expenditures calculated to prove their perennial inability to pay more to the workers ... More often than not, Shearer disproved these claims with remarkable mathematical accuracy ..." [4]

    Shearer was never politically ambitious. When Donald Sangster died a few weeks after being sworn in as prime minister in 1967, his successor was chosen by JLP parliamentarians. Only prompting by Bustamante persuaded the reluctant Shearer to put his name forward. On the first ballot Clem Tavares' received 12 votes, Hugh Shearer 10 and Robert Lightbourne 8, with Shearer reportedly spoiling his ballot. On the second ballot Shearer gained 16 votes to Tavares' 15. [5]

    Shearer was Jamaica's first visibly black head of government - his predecessors, Bustamante, Norman Manley and Sangster were all brown. One of his first significant moves was the establishment of national Jamaican honours and awards to replace British ones. He also instituted a deliberate policy of gradual 'Jamaicanisation', whereby locals slowly replaced the white English expatriates who held most senior civil services posts at Independence.

    Then there was the Walter Rodney affair. In October 1968, the black power activist Rodney was a lecturer at the University of the West Indies' Mona campus. He attended a black writers' conference in Montreal, but on his return was refused re-admittance to Jamaica, for "carrying on activities which constituted a danger to the security of the nation". [6] This sparked a demonstration by UWI students, which degenerated into a riot that claimed three lives and caused over £1 million of property damage.

    A parliamentary motion upholding the Government's decision to ban Rodney was passed without dissent. Then Opposition leader Norman Manley said, "Let me state that I am satisfied on those facts that they put before us, that Walter Rodney is an undesirable person." [7]

    Manley added, "It is good for Jamaica to know that the reason why Dr Rodney was expelled from this country was because he was engaged in organising activities which advocated violence and the overthrow of those things which are highly treasured in this country - our progress toward a multiracial society in which a man is not as good as his skin, but as good as his merit. And anything that tends to undermine our motto - in spite of our hardship, in spite of our suffering, in spite of our troubles ... is bad for Jamaica." [8]

    Years after, Shearer reflected:

    "Black ambition, black equality of opportunity, black dignity, economic strength and self-respect. That's black power! ... when Sir Alexander Bustamante made Isaac Barrant a minister, a man who started his working life as a side man on a truck, and the middle class opposed the appointment, that was black power in operation! And when Edwin Allen, minister of education, prescribed that 70 per cent of the places in secondary schools should be reserved for Primary School children who passed the Common Entrance Examination, and 30 per cent for preparatory school children, that was black power! And when Sir Clifford Campbell was appointed governor general, that was a move in furtherance of black power! And don't forget the strong and vulgar criticism about the appointment of this black man to the highest post in the land. And when we decided to send for the body of Marcus Garvey to give him eminence in his own country, that was black power!" [9]

    It's almost criminal that a man who contributed so much to building his country should be belittled today because of sheer ignorance. Which itself is partly, if not largely, a product of the virtual elimination of history as a separate subject in our schools. To put it bluntly, misguided government policy is causing Jamaicans to forget their past. Do our public and school libraries even have copies of Hartley Neita's Hugh Shearer: A Voice for the People?

    If you don't know where you're coming from, how can you know where you're going?

    FOOTNOTES

    [1] Neita, Hartley. Hugh Shearer : A Voice For The People. Ian Randle Publishers. Kingston. 2005. Page 192.

    [2] ibid. Page 178

    [3] ibid. Page 183

    [4] ibid. Page 103-4

    [5] ibid. Page 229.

    [6] Knight, Franklin and Palmer, Colin. The Modern Caribbean. University of North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill. 1989. Page 120

    [7] Neita, Hartley. Hugh Shearer : A Voice For The People. Page 298

    [8] Knight, Franklin and Palmer, Colin. The Modern Caribbean. Page 120-121

    [9] Neita, Hartley. Hugh Shearer : A Voice For The People. Page 299

    Feedback may be sent to changkob@hotmail.com or columns@gleanerjm.com.

    http://www.jamaica-gleaner.com/glean...us/focus3.html
    "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

  • #2
    Originally posted by Lazie View Post
    Published: Sunday | May 24, 2009



    Kevin O'Brien Chang
    When the $1,000 bill with Michael Manley's portrait was put into circulation, no one objected. So why the protests about putting Hugh Shearer on the new $5,000 note? He is just as worthy as Alexander Bustamante, Norman Manley, Donald Sangster, and Michael Manley. To argue otherwise is ignorant disrespect of a great Jamaican.

    My July 8, 2004 Sunday Gleaner article, 'Hugh Shearer - Jamaica's greatest prime minister?' statistically analysed each prime ministerial regime using four measures - life expectancy, literacy rate, GDP per capita and murder rate per capita. The numbers ranked Hugh Shearer (1968-72) Jamaica's most effective prime minister, followed by Edward Seaga (1981-89), Alexander Bustamante/Donald Sangster (1962-7), the 1990s' Michael Manley (1990-1992), P.J. Patterson (1993-2002) and the 1970s' Michael Manley (1973-1980).

    Shearer's was the only administration where Jamaica did better than the global norm, while we suffered our largest relative decline under the 1970s' Manley. Life expectancy and literacy rates changed at similar rates during both regimes. For 1968-1972, our annual GDP growth rate was 3.5 per cent greater than the world average, and our murder rate increase per annum was .2 per cent less than in the US. For 1973-1980, our annual GDP growth rate was six per cent less than the world average, and our murder rate increase per annum was 9.1 per cent more than in the US.

    Numbers may not tell the whole story, but they speak without bias. Sources and methodology are outlined in the aforementioned article.

    First UN address


    Prime Minister Hugh Shearer at a sugar industry meeting at Petersfield Primary School, Westmoreland in 1969. - File

    On October 8, 1962, Hugh Shearer delivered Jamaica's first United Nations address, calling for an international year of human rights.

    To quote from Hartley Neita's Hugh Shearer: A Voice for the People:

    "It was, and still is, customary at the United Nations for addresses by the representatives of governments to be given generous applause. But as Shearer ... walked from the podium ... the applause which began as a polite exercise slowly increased in tempo and decibels as the tremendous significance of the proposal for a celebration of human rights registered ... delegates left their seats to crowd the Jamaican delegation and Shearer, genuinely congratulating him on his presentation and promising support for the extraordinary, and possibly controversial, proposal on human rights." A year later the UN designated 1968 the International Year of Human Rights. [1] In terms of actual results, this was probably the most important UN speech ever made by a Jamaican.

    Race



    NEITA

    Hugh Shearer had also previously urged then Prime Minister Bustamante to appoint the black former school teacher Clifford Campbell as the first Jamaican governor general, when others had been recommending someone from the light-skinned elite. [2]

    Here is Neita again:

    "In the public and private sectors, the senior posts were held by men who were caucasian and white, or what was defined as brown. In the banks, airlines and major companies, the staff was also of a similar colour, except for the messengers and cleaning staff who were all black ...

    "Shearer was very aware of these distinctions and prejudices which flowed from them. In labour negotiations, the chairmen, managing directors, personnel managers, accountants and lawyers of companies who sat across the conference tables from him were from the white upper stratum of the society. The thousands for whom he argued - the factory workers, drivers, barmaids, cane-cutters, and shop assistants - were black. Obtaining facilities for them at the workplace, such as showers and canteens, was, as we Jamaicans would say, "as hard as pulling teeth".

    So to have a black person living in the State house of the country was a powerful symbol of change." [3]

    Hugh Shearer was a pioneering trade unionist, who won many improvements for workers in the areas of wages, living conditions, pension rights, working hours, maternity leave, and health and education benefits. He was renowned for his mastery of the facts during negotiations.

    "The upcoming mathematical wizard was to strike terror in the hearts of the many bigwig employers with their "cook and book" exposition of income and expenditures calculated to prove their perennial inability to pay more to the workers ... More often than not, Shearer disproved these claims with remarkable mathematical accuracy ..." [4]

    Shearer was never politically ambitious. When Donald Sangster died a few weeks after being sworn in as prime minister in 1967, his successor was chosen by JLP parliamentarians. Only prompting by Bustamante persuaded the reluctant Shearer to put his name forward. On the first ballot Clem Tavares' received 12 votes, Hugh Shearer 10 and Robert Lightbourne 8, with Shearer reportedly spoiling his ballot. On the second ballot Shearer gained 16 votes to Tavares' 15. [5]

    Shearer was Jamaica's first visibly black head of government - his predecessors, Bustamante, Norman Manley and Sangster were all brown. One of his first significant moves was the establishment of national Jamaican honours and awards to replace British ones. He also instituted a deliberate policy of gradual 'Jamaicanisation', whereby locals slowly replaced the white English expatriates who held most senior civil services posts at Independence.

    Then there was the Walter Rodney affair. In October 1968, the black power activist Rodney was a lecturer at the University of the West Indies' Mona campus. He attended a black writers' conference in Montreal, but on his return was refused re-admittance to Jamaica, for "carrying on activities which constituted a danger to the security of the nation". [6] This sparked a demonstration by UWI students, which degenerated into a riot that claimed three lives and caused over £1 million of property damage.

    A parliamentary motion upholding the Government's decision to ban Rodney was passed without dissent. Then Opposition leader Norman Manley said, "Let me state that I am satisfied on those facts that they put before us, that Walter Rodney is an undesirable person." [7]

    Manley added, "It is good for Jamaica to know that the reason why Dr Rodney was expelled from this country was because he was engaged in organising activities which advocated violence and the overthrow of those things which are highly treasured in this country - our progress toward a multiracial society in which a man is not as good as his skin, but as good as his merit. And anything that tends to undermine our motto - in spite of our hardship, in spite of our suffering, in spite of our troubles ... is bad for Jamaica." [8]

    Years after, Shearer reflected:

    "Black ambition, black equality of opportunity, black dignity, economic strength and self-respect. That's black power! ... when Sir Alexander Bustamante made Isaac Barrant a minister, a man who started his working life as a side man on a truck, and the middle class opposed the appointment, that was black power in operation! And when Edwin Allen, minister of education, prescribed that 70 per cent of the places in secondary schools should be reserved for Primary School children who passed the Common Entrance Examination, and 30 per cent for preparatory school children, that was black power! And when Sir Clifford Campbell was appointed governor general, that was a move in furtherance of black power! And don't forget the strong and vulgar criticism about the appointment of this black man to the highest post in the land. And when we decided to send for the body of Marcus Garvey to give him eminence in his own country, that was black power!" [9]

    It's almost criminal that a man who contributed so much to building his country should be belittled today because of sheer ignorance. Which itself is partly, if not largely, a product of the virtual elimination of history as a separate subject in our schools. To put it bluntly, misguided government policy is causing Jamaicans to forget their past. Do our public and school libraries even have copies of Hartley Neita's Hugh Shearer: A Voice for the People?

    If you don't know where you're coming from, how can you know where you're going?

    FOOTNOTES

    [1] Neita, Hartley. Hugh Shearer : A Voice For The People. Ian Randle Publishers. Kingston. 2005. Page 192.

    [2] ibid. Page 178

    [3] ibid. Page 183

    [4] ibid. Page 103-4

    [5] ibid. Page 229.

    [6] Knight, Franklin and Palmer, Colin. The Modern Caribbean. University of North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill. 1989. Page 120

    [7] Neita, Hartley. Hugh Shearer : A Voice For The People. Page 298

    [8] Knight, Franklin and Palmer, Colin. The Modern Caribbean. Page 120-121

    [9] Neita, Hartley. Hugh Shearer : A Voice For The People. Page 299

    Feedback may be sent to changkob@hotmail.com or columns@gleanerjm.com.

    http://www.jamaica-gleaner.com/glean...us/focus3.html
    This is like saying the first term of George W Bush would make him one of America's greatest presidents.... because he happened to be in power during a great economic expansion.

    That would almost be as disingenuous and naive as the above analysis of Shearer ... but not quite.
    TIVOLI: THE DESTRUCTION OF JAMAICA'S EVIL EMPIRE

    Recognizing the victims of Jamaica's horrendous criminality and exposing the Dummies like Dippy supporting criminals by their deeds.. or their silence.

    D1 - Xposing Dummies since 2007

    Comment


    • #3
      Its also interesting how Mr Chang gives the impression that the Walter Rodney affair was an isolated incident and not part of a larger attack by the government of the day on the black power movement in the country.

      Shearer was a decent person overall and did good work as a trade unionist, but an outstanding PM he was NOT.

      And BTW, this doesn't mean he should not be put on the $5000 note. I have no problem with that at all.
      "‎It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men" - Frederick Douglass

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Islandman View Post
        Its also interesting how Mr Chang gives the impression that the Walter Rodney affair was an isolated incident and not part of a larger attack by the government of the day on the black power movement in the country.

        Shearer was a decent person overall and did good work as a trade unionist, but an outstanding PM he was NOT.

        And BTW, this doesn't mean he should not be put on the $5000 note. I have no problem with that at all.
        Islandman, out of curiosity, who is our best PM todate?
        "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Islandman View Post
          Its also interesting how Mr Chang gives the impression that the Walter Rodney affair was an isolated incident and not part of a larger attack by the government of the day on the black power movement in the country.

          Shearer was a decent person overall and did good work as a trade unionist, but an outstanding PM he was NOT.

          And BTW, this doesn't mean he should not be put on the $5000 note. I have no problem with that at all.
          No problem with Shearer on the note either!... not a bad choice at all. Very decent man as you said... if he had led the JLP during the 1970s we would not have had the mortal combat then .... also if Vivian Blake (not the JLP don!) had led the PNP then... the same would be true no doubt.

          However the claims made regardingShearer's stewardship are inflated... the writer is a partisan of the current party in power so it's not surprising that he would be so defensive about Shearer.... he will get major brownie points from within his circle.

          Question: Who goes on the soon to come $10,000 note? Douglas Chambers, the tragically martyred corruption fighter?

          At the rate the rate is going... that note will be required sometime within the JLP second term.
          TIVOLI: THE DESTRUCTION OF JAMAICA'S EVIL EMPIRE

          Recognizing the victims of Jamaica's horrendous criminality and exposing the Dummies like Dippy supporting criminals by their deeds.. or their silence.

          D1 - Xposing Dummies since 2007

          Comment


          • #6
            If we are talking strictly about work done as PM I would have to go with Seaga. In terms of tangible progress given the state of the country when he took office to when he left it is hard to argue with what he achieved.

            He did a lot of damage when he was not the PM, both to the country overall in the late 60s and 70s and later to his party after the 80s, which they barely survived, so as an overall national political leader he ranks a lot further down the list.

            Also if we were to include the pre-indepedence era from 1938 - 1962 I would probably go with NW Manley as the best leader of government we have had.
            "‎It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men" - Frederick Douglass

            Comment


            • #7
              Agree 100%

              A very logical post, Islandman.

              Like you, I have no hesitation in selecting Edward Seaga as the most outstanding prime minister Jamaica has had to date (his outstanding work/contribution during the 1980s is obvious), and I also share your view on Norman Washington Manley. In other words, you have articulated very well my own personal opinion in relation to the question.

              Originally posted by Islandman View Post
              If we are talking strictly about work done as PM I would have to go with Seaga. In terms of tangible progress given the state of the country when he took office to when he left it is hard to argue with what he achieved.

              He did a lot of damage when he was not the PM, both to the country overall in the late 60s and 70s and later to his party after the 80s, which they barely survived, so as an overall national political leader he ranks a lot further down the list.

              Also if we were to include the pre-indepedence era from 1938 - 1962 I would probably go with NW Manley as the best leader of government we have had.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Historian View Post
                A very logical post, Islandman.

                Like you, I have no hesitation in selecting Edward Seaga as the most outstanding prime minister Jamaica has had to date (his outstanding work/contribution during the 1980s is obvious), and I also share your view on Norman Washington Manley. In other words, you have articulated very well my own personal opinion in relation to the question.
                I guess when you are ranked with a sorry bunch... it's easy to be "outstanding".
                TIVOLI: THE DESTRUCTION OF JAMAICA'S EVIL EMPIRE

                Recognizing the victims of Jamaica's horrendous criminality and exposing the Dummies like Dippy supporting criminals by their deeds.. or their silence.

                D1 - Xposing Dummies since 2007

                Comment


                • #9
                  perhaps...and whose fault is that?

                  Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    there a job in Newcastle with his name on it....
                    “I am not a politician..I only suffer the consequences”.......Peter Tosh

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Islandman View Post
                      If we are talking strictly about work done as PM I would have to go with Seaga. In terms of tangible progress given the state of the country when he took office to when he left it is hard to argue with what he achieved.

                      He did a lot of damage when he was not the PM, both to the country overall in the late 60s and 70s and later to his party after the 80s, which they barely survived, so as an overall national political leader he ranks a lot further down the list.

                      Also if we were to include the pre-indepedence era from 1938 - 1962 I would probably go with NW Manley as the best leader of government we have had.
                      Looking at the numbers which never lie ... Shearer has to be the best. Can appreciate yuh honesty about the Most Hated. Nuff people like the one formerly known as Don1 would rather die than be honest.
                      "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Don1 View Post
                        I guess when you are ranked with a sorry bunch... it's easy to be "outstanding".
                        ... the bitterness continues.
                        "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Gamma View Post
                          perhaps...and whose fault is that?
                          who's fault is what?

                          In the world of the blind... the one eyed man is king.

                          Blindaga may be our one eyed man but... to regard him as Jamaica's greatest ever PM??

                          Hmmmm... those are not quite the terms I would use to describe his record in office.
                          TIVOLI: THE DESTRUCTION OF JAMAICA'S EVIL EMPIRE

                          Recognizing the victims of Jamaica's horrendous criminality and exposing the Dummies like Dippy supporting criminals by their deeds.. or their silence.

                          D1 - Xposing Dummies since 2007

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Lazie View Post
                            ... the bitterness continues.
                            Yeah... bitter that they are such a sorry bunch.

                            Sycophants like you are overjoyed once your favorites are in power.... even as the country continues on the road to nowhere.
                            TIVOLI: THE DESTRUCTION OF JAMAICA'S EVIL EMPIRE

                            Recognizing the victims of Jamaica's horrendous criminality and exposing the Dummies like Dippy supporting criminals by their deeds.. or their silence.

                            D1 - Xposing Dummies since 2007

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Don1 View Post
                              Yeah... bitter that they are such a sorry bunch.

                              Sycophants like you are overjoyed once your favorites are in power.... even as the country continues on the road to nowhere.
                              You miss the point Comrade. Bitter as in "Sycophants" like you who allowed the country to fall behind for 18 years .... then continuously show bitterness because your party has been removed from office. You've been exposed Bittah1.
                              "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X