RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Groups differ on budget presentation

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Groups differ on budget presentation

    Patrick Foster

    Friday, April 24, 2009

    PROFESSIONAL groups and trade unions last evening gave varied responses to Finance Minister Audley Shaw's $555-billion budget presentation, arguably the most critical in the history of the nation.
    Shaw announced the much speculated gasoline tax, setting it at $8.75 per litre, along with other tough decisions such as a three per cent increase of the customs user fee on selected petroleum products.
    The imposing of a gas tax spurred concerns that it could lead to social unrest given events such as in April 1999 when its announcement triggered islandwide violence.
    But Shaw tempered his harsh budget with a 100 per cent increase in the income tax threshold that will see it move from $220,000 per year to $440,000 per year in two stages, beginning in July and culminating next January.
    Jamaica Gasoline Retailers Association (JGRA) president Trevor Barnes, who on Wednesday told the Observer he was awaiting the finance minister's budget speech before commenting on the gas tax, yesterday accepted the $8.75 cess as necessary.
    "We understand the predicament the country faces and we have to call on our members and the country to try and ride out this difficult time," he said.
    The JGRA had proposed that special payments made by Petrojam to gasoline marketing companies be diverted to Government to offset a tax on gasoline.
    But yesterday, he admitted that the approximately $1 billion to be garnered from that approach would not be enough to negate the need for a cess on petrol. "The budget shortfall is much greater than that, but it could help," Barnes said.
    President of the National Workers Union Vincent Morrison was more militant, dismissing the budget as a slight of hand. "Overall there is nothing in the budget for the workers," Morrison charged. "There is no gain for them."
    "It's like you give something in the right hand and take it back in the left hand," he said, contending that the tax on gasoline was regressive.
    Private Sector Organisation of Jamaica president Christopher Zacca, arguing that the country had been "borrowing too much for too long", said that Government had little choice in presenting the measures it did.
    Zacca added that the finance minister did a good job in an extremely difficult position considering the current international economic crisis.
    "He did a reasonable job in presenting (the budget) in a way to diffuse tensions about civil unrest," Zacca said, adding that further analysis would have to be done to see the possible effects of the various announcements made by Shaw.
    Meanwhile, Jamaica Teachers' Association president Doran Dixon, caught up in the discussions regarding teacher's salary, said he was unable to give an opinion.

    http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/...SENTATION_.asp
    "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

  • #2
    No one benefits from this budget. THAT is the point. This is not a zero sum game...it is a minus game. Everyone loses as the econmy shrinks.

    Comment


    • #3
      I listen to Mr. Shaw presentation and it was a pretty decent one. The fact is now instead of paying to HEART, Education and all the other taxes it is now one. Made simplier and easier to collect.

      We know that one of the drain in the Jamaican economy is the money heading north from these hotels and major coporation, not even taxed but now they have to pay their share on their earnings.

      Gas tax to fix road? What a novel idea? Hopefully within a few years taxi drivers and road users don't have to buy a new front end every other month. The road fixing will be done based on recommendation of committee made up of the different professional groups and community organization. Now maybe fixing road may not be the election issue anymore as Mosiah wanted if them serious. If it really goes to fix road I am for it as road is even a major concern than the price of gas to most communities I know and better road enable development as people have access to secondary roads.

      Raising the PAYE is even better than a 7% raise in income, people take home more.

      There is more but I can't remember them now.
      • Don't let negative things break you, instead let it be your strength, your reason for growth. Life is for living and I won't spend my life feeling cheated and downtrodden.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Willi View Post
        No one benefits from this budget. THAT is the point. This is not a zero sum game...it is a minus game. Everyone loses as the econmy shrinks.
        Well! Well!
        I wonder how long ago it was that we were saying this shall happen...and referenced Edward Seaga's measures of earlier times?

        So there are smaller "pay cheques" and growing unemployment and underemployment (shrinking of jobs)...and around the corner waits the opening of the doors of the institutions and the disgorging of multiple thousands of new entrants to the job market?
        "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

        Comment


        • #5
          Necesary increasing of tax revenue...

          PS:
          ...the salve, that presentation of increasing the income tax threshold from the individual's viewpoint has to be seen against what impact the various others taxes will have on purchasing power...on the individual's attempts to maintain current living standards????
          "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

          Comment


          • #6
            The fact is too many people are not paying tax.

            If they want road to fix then they have to contribute. Either they pick up the pix axe, shovel and owe, or pay a few more dollars for gas.

            Do you think gas tax hit the poor as hard as the rich man? Not if you walk to work or take a JUTC bus.
            • Don't let negative things break you, instead let it be your strength, your reason for growth. Life is for living and I won't spend my life feeling cheated and downtrodden.

            Comment


            • #7
              The fallacy is that people expect to increase/maintain standard of living in this environment.

              People need to condition their minds to WORSE. This will make the transition easier. It will get a lot worse in the coming months and years. THESE ARE the good times!

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Assasin View Post
                The fact is now instead of paying to HEART, Education and all the other taxes it is now one. Made simplier and easier to collect.
                So how that go now? You pay income tax and "payroll" tax , but no separate NHT, NIS, Ed Tax, etc? That would make sense as the names for these taxes didn't have much relationship to how much money the sectors are allocated.

                Of course I am a big supporter of the gas tax or any other tax like that which spreads the net wider. The SUV drivers who don't pay any taxes will pay some this way, and the PAYE people get a little break. The more tax solutions like the we can come up with , the better.

                All in all, it looks like they managed a good balancing act with the new tax structure. And with all the pre-warnings and speeches about people not paying their fair share, it didn't catch people off-guard.
                "‎It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men" - Frederick Douglass

                Comment


                • #9
                  True!

                  For the payrol taxes, it should be just Income Tax and Social charges. as simple as that.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    You predicted the Global Economic Crisis ????

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Assasin View Post
                      Now maybe fixing road may not be the election issue anymore as Mosiah wanted if them serious. If it really goes to fix road I am for it as road is even a major concern than the price of gas to most communities I know and better road enable development as people have access to secondary roads.
                      Well, wi need a tax fi water, light and housing now, and den wi criss!


                      BLACK LIVES MATTER

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X