When one attempts to analyse any issue, in this case Jamaican tourism, it's easy to cite newspaper reports... which usually involve a restatement of some speech by a government official.
Such an official (even if well meaning or competent) clearly has a vested interest in presenting the most rosy picture possible of his portfolio. He will cherry pick stats that fit that agenda.
So it's up to a discerning individual to pick reality from fluff.... that's where independent research comes in if one is so inclined.
Jamaican journalists are not particularly noted for thorough research so their output is not always reliable... Sikko excepted!
The Caribbean Tourism Organization tracks regional performance in the industry. Their 2008 data shows that Jamaica's main regional competitors had arrivals ranging from a +30% increase (Curacao) to -10.8% Anguilla... this excludes Guyana which does not take tourism seriously.
Jamaica's 2008 return was +3.9% ..... not bad... but not particularly great..... Jamaica's output was about in the middle of the pack statistically. So more context is required to assess Jamaica.
To drill down deeper one has to look at room occupancy and room additions in 2008. If Jamaica added morethan 3.9% to its room capacity in 2008... then % occupancy would be down.... a bad scenario.
Reliable figures are not easy to come by but Jamaica's 2008 room additions are probably at or above 4% (ie about 1000-1200 rooms)... if this is true... our 2008 performance efficiency would be flat or declining... and a cause for concern.... especially since the hotel building boom has abated.
It almost certainly means that the bulk of any increased 2008 arrivals is largely due to ROOM GROWTH and not ministerial or agency performance. Since our rivals are generally not adding rooms at Jamaica's pace... even our modest regional performance may be too flattering to Jamaica.
While Bartlett is doing an OK job... he owes the public not just cherry picked and rosy numbers that lead some down the garden path... but a realistic assessment of industry performance.
Such an official (even if well meaning or competent) clearly has a vested interest in presenting the most rosy picture possible of his portfolio. He will cherry pick stats that fit that agenda.
So it's up to a discerning individual to pick reality from fluff.... that's where independent research comes in if one is so inclined.
Jamaican journalists are not particularly noted for thorough research so their output is not always reliable... Sikko excepted!
The Caribbean Tourism Organization tracks regional performance in the industry. Their 2008 data shows that Jamaica's main regional competitors had arrivals ranging from a +30% increase (Curacao) to -10.8% Anguilla... this excludes Guyana which does not take tourism seriously.
Jamaica's 2008 return was +3.9% ..... not bad... but not particularly great..... Jamaica's output was about in the middle of the pack statistically. So more context is required to assess Jamaica.
To drill down deeper one has to look at room occupancy and room additions in 2008. If Jamaica added morethan 3.9% to its room capacity in 2008... then % occupancy would be down.... a bad scenario.
Reliable figures are not easy to come by but Jamaica's 2008 room additions are probably at or above 4% (ie about 1000-1200 rooms)... if this is true... our 2008 performance efficiency would be flat or declining... and a cause for concern.... especially since the hotel building boom has abated.
It almost certainly means that the bulk of any increased 2008 arrivals is largely due to ROOM GROWTH and not ministerial or agency performance. Since our rivals are generally not adding rooms at Jamaica's pace... even our modest regional performance may be too flattering to Jamaica.
While Bartlett is doing an OK job... he owes the public not just cherry picked and rosy numbers that lead some down the garden path... but a realistic assessment of industry performance.
Comment