RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

'Democracy at stake'

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 'Democracy at stake'

    - Public funding of parties will curb corruption - Canada's former elections boss
    published: Thursday | December 4, 2008

    Daraine Luton, Staff Reporter


    Kingsley

    CANADA'S FORMER director of elections, Jean Pierre Kingsley, is encouraging Jamaica to press ahead with plans to fund political parties from the public purse.

    Kingsley was the main presenter during a forum on campaign-finance reform held at the Mona Visitors' Lodge at the University of the West Indies, Mona, yesterday.

    The former director of elections, who is credited with leading the modernisation of the Canadian voting process, urged the Electoral Commis-sion of Jamaica (ECJ) to continue with the proposed reform of campaign finance. He added that if this was not done, then the country's democracy could be compromised.

    "If the political system does not regulate the money, then one may well expect that the money will regulate the system," Kingsley said, while noting that most Jamaicans were in favour of their tax dollars being used to fund political parties.

    Majority says yes

    According to an ECJ survey on the relationship between governments and political parties, 71 per cent of Jamaicans support funding political parties from the public purse.

    Kingsley said 49 per cent of Jamaicans were strongly in support of directing their tax dollars to fund political parties.

    He argued that 56 per cent of those surveyed said strengthening political parties financially with public funds would help preserve and enhance democracy.

    "Money is required in politics and rightly so, if the aims of democracy are to be achieved," he said.

    Kingsley stressed that it was important for Jamaica to ensure that the money being used to drive the engine of its democracy was beyond question and did not come at a cost to citizens.

    Enhance governance

    Jamaica ranks second from bottom on the 2007 World Bank Governance Index in the Caribbean, sitting only above Haiti. Accountability, political stability and absence of violence, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law and control of corruption are the indicators used in the index.

    Supporters of campaign-finance reform have for years argued that public financing would enhance the quality of governance and reduce the influence of dirty money in the electoral system.

    Not a problem solver

    However, the former Canadian electoral official said moving to public financing in itself would not solve the problem.

    "You need a strong investigative function and you need a strong prosecutorial function in order to give teeth and meaning to the law," Kingsley said.

    Professor Trevor Munroe, a University of the West Indies lecturer of political science and defeated People's National Party candidate in the 2007 general election, told the gathering that the overwhelming number of Jamaicans embracing the idea of public financing of parties came as a surprise.

    "We need to structure a system of public funding in keeping with our needs at this time," Munroe told the forum.

    He said the legislative framework which accompanies the change must be more bite than the proverbial bark.

    "We do need something with teeth and we do need that as a matter of some urgency, given the concerns among our own citizenry about the levels of corruption (in politics)," Munroe said.

    Tax credits

    Jamaica Labour Party member Tom Tavares-Finson said it costs an estimated $30 million per year to run a political party efficiently.

    Under Canadian law, political parties receive public funding, directly in election expense reimbursements, and indirectly through tax credits to donors. They are, however, forbidden from accepting contributions from corporations and unions. Parties are also required to file quarterly financial reports.
    "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

  • #2
    yeah fund it from public purse and what will that stop?

    Will it stop the parties from collecting illegal money?

    Will that stop the cronies from influencing people with money, jobs and promise?

    it will just give them 30 million more on top of what they have and leave the tax payer with a bigger hole in the budget.

    And what if Election is called withing two years of each other who fund that?
    • Don't let negative things break you, instead let it be your strength, your reason for growth. Life is for living and I won't spend my life feeling cheated and downtrodden.

    Comment


    • #3
      In theory on would expect that it would help to minimise political patronage if not curb it.

      Political campaigns should be restricted to no more than one month duration.

      Parties would be on an equal footing... what would have to happen is that a budget would be established and audits could be carried out to see whether anyone exceeded it or not. All parties would be therefore on an even footing and so the best fund-raiser will not have an advantage simply because they have raised more money.

      No one in power will call election before its time...at least not in the time frame you are suggesting... unless thare are exceptional circumstances; it could happen but not with enough frequency to pose a problem... a suh me seeit
      Peter R

      Comment

      Working...
      X