RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hortical, lets have a discussion on taxes

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hortical, lets have a discussion on taxes

    What are your thoughts on a fair value for the highest marginal tax rate?

    I am sure you will agree that at a tax rate of 100%, nobody will work or invest to earn above the amount which triggers that rate since the reward is 0, and on the other end a tax rate of 0 will result in no revenue being collected so what do you think is a reasonable value for the MAXIMUM tax rate on wealthy people? While you are at it, what income does your definition of "wealthy" start at?

    In the late 70s and early 80s the US had a highest marginal tax rate of 70%. Do you think that since wealthy people had the money to pay that this was a good thing for the economy? Is it more important to feel like "rich" people are paying a lot of taxes?

    Reagan came to power and started cutting rates. He probably went too far the other way and lowered the highest tax rate to less than 30% but nonethless by the end of his presidency tax revenues were more than they were at the start. How do you think that was that possible? Clinton increased them back to in the mid to high 30s but never went back to the high rates of the pre 1981 period.

    Just one more question for now so i understand where you are coming from. Do you think it is a good thing for 40% of income earners in any society to pay absolutely NO income tax? . Or worse than that, that some people should be given money directly from the income tax system, when they did not pay any in?
    "‎It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men" - Frederick Douglass

  • #2
    none of my business but Reagan policies suited the times. it's no longer working(at this MOMENT in TIME) as we see the top 3% possessing 20% of the wealth.

    conservatism is not dead it was never practiced. it bothers me that the wealthy finds it HELL AWEFULL to pay there fair share(me and you know that with so many loopholes they are not paying anywhere near that).

    is 3% that painful, i guess Clinton was a communist.
    Karl commenting on Maschaeroni's sending off, "Getting sent off like that is anti-TEAM!
    Terrible decision by the player!":busshead::Laugh&roll::Laugh&roll::eek::La ugh&roll:

    Comment


    • #3
      Sure its your business.

      I agree with you on the conservatism thing at least under Bush and the current set of Republicans, and that 3% is not that painful for anybody given the circumstances.

      Care to give your view on what annual income defines wealthy? 250K? 500K? 2mil?
      "‎It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men" - Frederick Douglass

      Comment


      • #4
        when Spreewell can say him have a family to feed and refuse $21 million/3 years and TO sign $ 40 + million dollar contract and se him want raise, it's really hard to say.
        Karl commenting on Maschaeroni's sending off, "Getting sent off like that is anti-TEAM!
        Terrible decision by the player!":busshead::Laugh&roll::Laugh&roll::eek::La ugh&roll:

        Comment


        • #5
          LOL! Just goes to show everything is relative.

          Really though, I have friends who live in San Jose who make easily over 200K (household income) and between mortgage, property and state taxes, and cost of living over there it not really that much. They are not starving but it is just a regular middle class life like a family making 80K in other parts of the US.
          "‎It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men" - Frederick Douglass

          Comment


          • #6
            nuh dem want di 2 seater and mexican design house. not to mention di "otha" bills to pay
            Karl commenting on Maschaeroni's sending off, "Getting sent off like that is anti-TEAM!
            Terrible decision by the player!":busshead::Laugh&roll::Laugh&roll::eek::La ugh&roll:

            Comment


            • #7
              The Bush tax cuts will in 2010, and there will not be a need to raise taxes. Reducing corporate loop holes for companies who move their HQ overseas to avoid US taxes, that's a ideal place to start. The issue of wealthy is debatable, and varies by geographic area.
              Winning means you're willing to go longer, work harder, and give more than anyone else - Vince Lombardi

              Comment

              Working...
              X