Tweet
A New Cold War in the Caribbean?
Thursday, Jul. 24, 2008 By TIM PADGETT / MIAMI
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, right, and Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, left, gesture while speaking at a press conference at the presidential residence in Gorki on July 22, 2008.
Alexander Nemenov / AFP / Getty
Article ToolsPrint
Email
Reprints
Sphere
addthis_url = location.href; addthis_title = document.title; addthis_pub = 'timecom'; AddThis
RSS
time:http://www.time.com/time/world/artic...826161,00.htmlYahoo! Buzz
var ad = adFactory.getAd(88, 31);ad.setPosition(8)ad.write();
Ever since the Monroe Doctrine, the United States has seen the Caribbean in the way that the Romans viewed the Mediterranean — Mare Nostrum, Our Sea. From the Spanish-American War through the Cuban Missile Crisis and the Central American dirty wars of the Reagan era, Washington was always quick to flex its muscle over the rum-soaked waters that stretch from Florida to Venezuela. The bad news: It ain't our sea anymore, gringos.
Related Articles
The Sound & The Fury
TIME: Why do you attack President George W. Bush with such jolting language? CHAVEZ: I believe wor...
The US Dilemma Over Chavez
Laptop computers packed with evidence allegedly tying Venezuela’s leftist President Hugo Chavez to C...
Chavez: A Democratator in Venezuela?
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez Reuters Article Tools ...
Will Chávez’s Oil Still Flow?
Whether or not Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez is the next Fidel Castro, the leftist firebrand has...
tiiQuigoWriteAd(755777, 1290689, 180, 200, -1);
The headlines of the past week have underscored the extent to which U.S. hegemony in the Caribbean has faded. Whether it's Russia reportedly threatening to reestablish a military presence in Cuba, Iran cozying up to U.S. nemeses like Nicaragua's President Daniel Ortega, or U.S. free-trade partners such as the Dominican Republic and Costa Rica jumping into energy alliances with left-wing Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, Washington seems increasingly on the sidelines of a region the Bush Administration once called America's third border. "The U.S. let its guard down in the Caribbean after the Berlin Wall fell," says Johanna Mendelson-Forman, a senior associate for the Americas at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "As a result we've gone from unipolarity in that region to multipolarity, which isn't necessarily a bad thing, but we're in a real learning phase as to how to deal with it."
Chavez's visit to Moscow this week, not only to buy more than $1 billion worth of anti-aircraft missiles and submarines, but also to commune with growing anti-American resentment in Russia, resurrected old ghosts for some conservative yanqui lawmakers. Florida Congressman Connie Mack declared the Caracas-Moscow partnership "a stark reminder of the Cold War partnership between the Soviet Union and Cuba."
As if to encourage that Dr. Strangelove nostalgia, the Moscow daily Izvestia quoted high-level Russian military officials suggesting Russia might begin flying long-range bombers into Cuba again, almost two decades after the Soviets bolted Havana. That prompted U.S. Air Force General Norton Schwartz, President Bush's nominee for Air Force chief of staff, to tell a congressional confirmation hearing the next day that if the Russians were to base nuclear-capable bombers in Cuba, "I think we should stand strong and indicate that is something that crosses a threshold, crosses a red line." Cuban President Raul Castro has so far kept quiet about the Russian report; his older brother, Cuba's retired President Fidel Castro, commended his brother's silence and wrote on a government web site that Cuba "need not offer any explanations or excuses nor ask forgiveness" of the U.S.
The significance of the Izvestia bluster isn't that the Russians could be coming again — Moscow's defense minister later said any air force arrangement in Cuba would most likely involve stops for fuel rather than actual bases — but that they've returned to the idea of using the Caribbean to try to leverage Washington. The latest gestures may be designed as a warning to Washington that if it goes ahead with stationing a missile shield on Russia's borders, Moscow could reciprocate in America's backyard.
Russia isn't the only U.S. rival dipping its toes into the Caribbean of late. Iran has parlayed its deepening relationship with Chavez into an alliance with Nicaragua's Ortega. China and India, aside from receiving increased crude imports from oil-rich Venezuela, are themselves poised to help Cuba drill for an estimated 5 billion to 10 billion barrels of oil recently discovered off the island's coast. That find is so close to Florida shores that gringo oil execs are clamoring for a loosening of the 46-year-old U.S. trade embargo against communist Cuba so they can get in on the act. Brazil, which will also play a major role in tapping the Cuban crude, has exerted itself as a security player in the Caribbean as well, assuming the leadership of international forces in strife-torn Haiti.
Most Caribbean and Central American nations have now defied the Bush Administration's wishes and signed on to Chavez's regional energy cooperative, Petrocaribe. Started in 2006, Petrocaribe lets the basin's fuel-starved countries buy Venezuelan oil at just 40% of the current skyrocketing market price and pay back the difference over 25 years at 1% interest. Few Caribbean nations, struggling to juggle food and energy prices, can refuse Chavez's petro-diplomacy. His critics call it petro-bribery, using oil to broaden his fledgling anti-U.S. bloc in the hemisphere. But this month it won over Guatemala and Costa Rica to bring the number of Petrocaribe members to 19. And in U.S.-friendly countries that have so far balked at Chavez's deal, such as Barbados, the governments have taken heat from voters. Costa Rican President Oscar Arias was narrowly elected in 2006 by promising to keep Chavez's influence out of his Central American country. But last week, realizing that its oil expenditures have jumped 88% over the past year, he conceded that Costa Rica needed "to benefit sooner from this help."
Even before Chavez came to power, the U.S.-Caribbean bond wasn't all that warm, given the long history of unwelcome U.S. intervention in the form of coups, invasions and proxy warfare. Still, the 1999 handover of the Panama Canal to the Panamanians was seen as a magnanimous gesture, and the Bush Administration was able to ink a free trade pact with Central America and the Dominican Republic. Colombia, meanwhile, has emerged as the U.S.'s staunchest ally in Latin America. But a century of imperious U.S. misconduct, and a decade of Bush Administration indifference toward Latin America, has left the Caribbean more willing to look elsewhere for allies — many of whom are at odds with Washington.
So how can the U.S. regain its stature in the Caribbean? For starters, it can stop looking shocked to find that countries with whom it recently signed free trade agreements have also hooked up with Chavez. Free trade is usually a good thing — but not when it's approached, as the Bush Administration does, as a development panacea that doesn't address Third World exigencies like choosing between food and fuel. The U.S. and the United Nations have pledged a combined $117 million in food aid for starving Haiti this year, but to compete with Petrocaribe, the U.S. needs to move faster to help Caribbean basin nations develop biofuels such as sugar ethanol, while more broadly engaging the region diplomatically with efforts to help curb its nightmarish violent crime and the rising sea levels that threaten to displace entire coastal populations. "It will be the U.S., not Russia, that has to absorb that massive environmental migration," says Mendelson-Forman, who is scheduled to testify before Congress this week about Petrocaribe. "That should be enough to make us take the whole 'third border' concept more seriously."
Back in Moscow, Russian President Dmitri Medvedev was ebullient on Tuesday after Chavez added to the more than $3 billion he's spent on Russian weaponry in recent years. Chavez crowed about a "strategic partnership" with Russia to "guarantee the sovereignty of Venezuela, which the U.S. threatens." Medvedev gushed that it was the "common task" of Russia and Venezuela "to achieve a more democratic, just and secure world." All in all, it was a new Caribbean day in the Kremlin.
Thursday, Jul. 24, 2008 By TIM PADGETT / MIAMI
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, right, and Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, left, gesture while speaking at a press conference at the presidential residence in Gorki on July 22, 2008.
Alexander Nemenov / AFP / Getty
Article ToolsPrint
Reprints
Sphere
addthis_url = location.href; addthis_title = document.title; addthis_pub = 'timecom'; AddThis
RSS
time:http://www.time.com/time/world/artic...826161,00.htmlYahoo! Buzz
var ad = adFactory.getAd(88, 31);ad.setPosition(8)ad.write();
Ever since the Monroe Doctrine, the United States has seen the Caribbean in the way that the Romans viewed the Mediterranean — Mare Nostrum, Our Sea. From the Spanish-American War through the Cuban Missile Crisis and the Central American dirty wars of the Reagan era, Washington was always quick to flex its muscle over the rum-soaked waters that stretch from Florida to Venezuela. The bad news: It ain't our sea anymore, gringos.
Related Articles
TIME: Why do you attack President George W. Bush with such jolting language? CHAVEZ: I believe wor...
The US Dilemma Over Chavez
Laptop computers packed with evidence allegedly tying Venezuela’s leftist President Hugo Chavez to C...
Chavez: A Democratator in Venezuela?
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez Reuters Article Tools ...
Will Chávez’s Oil Still Flow?
Whether or not Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez is the next Fidel Castro, the leftist firebrand has...
tiiQuigoWriteAd(755777, 1290689, 180, 200, -1);
The headlines of the past week have underscored the extent to which U.S. hegemony in the Caribbean has faded. Whether it's Russia reportedly threatening to reestablish a military presence in Cuba, Iran cozying up to U.S. nemeses like Nicaragua's President Daniel Ortega, or U.S. free-trade partners such as the Dominican Republic and Costa Rica jumping into energy alliances with left-wing Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, Washington seems increasingly on the sidelines of a region the Bush Administration once called America's third border. "The U.S. let its guard down in the Caribbean after the Berlin Wall fell," says Johanna Mendelson-Forman, a senior associate for the Americas at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "As a result we've gone from unipolarity in that region to multipolarity, which isn't necessarily a bad thing, but we're in a real learning phase as to how to deal with it."
Chavez's visit to Moscow this week, not only to buy more than $1 billion worth of anti-aircraft missiles and submarines, but also to commune with growing anti-American resentment in Russia, resurrected old ghosts for some conservative yanqui lawmakers. Florida Congressman Connie Mack declared the Caracas-Moscow partnership "a stark reminder of the Cold War partnership between the Soviet Union and Cuba."
As if to encourage that Dr. Strangelove nostalgia, the Moscow daily Izvestia quoted high-level Russian military officials suggesting Russia might begin flying long-range bombers into Cuba again, almost two decades after the Soviets bolted Havana. That prompted U.S. Air Force General Norton Schwartz, President Bush's nominee for Air Force chief of staff, to tell a congressional confirmation hearing the next day that if the Russians were to base nuclear-capable bombers in Cuba, "I think we should stand strong and indicate that is something that crosses a threshold, crosses a red line." Cuban President Raul Castro has so far kept quiet about the Russian report; his older brother, Cuba's retired President Fidel Castro, commended his brother's silence and wrote on a government web site that Cuba "need not offer any explanations or excuses nor ask forgiveness" of the U.S.
The significance of the Izvestia bluster isn't that the Russians could be coming again — Moscow's defense minister later said any air force arrangement in Cuba would most likely involve stops for fuel rather than actual bases — but that they've returned to the idea of using the Caribbean to try to leverage Washington. The latest gestures may be designed as a warning to Washington that if it goes ahead with stationing a missile shield on Russia's borders, Moscow could reciprocate in America's backyard.
Russia isn't the only U.S. rival dipping its toes into the Caribbean of late. Iran has parlayed its deepening relationship with Chavez into an alliance with Nicaragua's Ortega. China and India, aside from receiving increased crude imports from oil-rich Venezuela, are themselves poised to help Cuba drill for an estimated 5 billion to 10 billion barrels of oil recently discovered off the island's coast. That find is so close to Florida shores that gringo oil execs are clamoring for a loosening of the 46-year-old U.S. trade embargo against communist Cuba so they can get in on the act. Brazil, which will also play a major role in tapping the Cuban crude, has exerted itself as a security player in the Caribbean as well, assuming the leadership of international forces in strife-torn Haiti.
Most Caribbean and Central American nations have now defied the Bush Administration's wishes and signed on to Chavez's regional energy cooperative, Petrocaribe. Started in 2006, Petrocaribe lets the basin's fuel-starved countries buy Venezuelan oil at just 40% of the current skyrocketing market price and pay back the difference over 25 years at 1% interest. Few Caribbean nations, struggling to juggle food and energy prices, can refuse Chavez's petro-diplomacy. His critics call it petro-bribery, using oil to broaden his fledgling anti-U.S. bloc in the hemisphere. But this month it won over Guatemala and Costa Rica to bring the number of Petrocaribe members to 19. And in U.S.-friendly countries that have so far balked at Chavez's deal, such as Barbados, the governments have taken heat from voters. Costa Rican President Oscar Arias was narrowly elected in 2006 by promising to keep Chavez's influence out of his Central American country. But last week, realizing that its oil expenditures have jumped 88% over the past year, he conceded that Costa Rica needed "to benefit sooner from this help."
Even before Chavez came to power, the U.S.-Caribbean bond wasn't all that warm, given the long history of unwelcome U.S. intervention in the form of coups, invasions and proxy warfare. Still, the 1999 handover of the Panama Canal to the Panamanians was seen as a magnanimous gesture, and the Bush Administration was able to ink a free trade pact with Central America and the Dominican Republic. Colombia, meanwhile, has emerged as the U.S.'s staunchest ally in Latin America. But a century of imperious U.S. misconduct, and a decade of Bush Administration indifference toward Latin America, has left the Caribbean more willing to look elsewhere for allies — many of whom are at odds with Washington.
So how can the U.S. regain its stature in the Caribbean? For starters, it can stop looking shocked to find that countries with whom it recently signed free trade agreements have also hooked up with Chavez. Free trade is usually a good thing — but not when it's approached, as the Bush Administration does, as a development panacea that doesn't address Third World exigencies like choosing between food and fuel. The U.S. and the United Nations have pledged a combined $117 million in food aid for starving Haiti this year, but to compete with Petrocaribe, the U.S. needs to move faster to help Caribbean basin nations develop biofuels such as sugar ethanol, while more broadly engaging the region diplomatically with efforts to help curb its nightmarish violent crime and the rising sea levels that threaten to displace entire coastal populations. "It will be the U.S., not Russia, that has to absorb that massive environmental migration," says Mendelson-Forman, who is scheduled to testify before Congress this week about Petrocaribe. "That should be enough to make us take the whole 'third border' concept more seriously."
Back in Moscow, Russian President Dmitri Medvedev was ebullient on Tuesday after Chavez added to the more than $3 billion he's spent on Russian weaponry in recent years. Chavez crowed about a "strategic partnership" with Russia to "guarantee the sovereignty of Venezuela, which the U.S. threatens." Medvedev gushed that it was the "common task" of Russia and Venezuela "to achieve a more democratic, just and secure world." All in all, it was a new Caribbean day in the Kremlin.
Comment