RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Clansman leader denied bail

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Clansman leader denied bail

    Clansman leader denied bail


    Reputed leader of the Clans-man gang, 27-year-old Tesha Miller, will have to remain behind bars until his murder trial begins on September 29.
    He was denied bail when he appeared yesterday in the Home Circuit Court.
    He is to face trial for the murder of Rohan Haughton, who was fatally shot in April 2004.
    He is facing four counts of murder but his triple-murder case has been set for mention on September 18.
    Justice Marjorie Cole Smith, after hearing a lengthy bail application from defence lawyers Everton Bird and Valerie Neita Robertson, turned down the application.

    Absconded
    The Crown had opposed bail on the grounds that Miller had breached the conditions of his bail and had absconded bail.
    While Miller was on bail on the murder charges, he fled to the United States of America in May 2005, but the federal authorities sent him back.
    The judge said that because of the breaches, the only thing she could do in the circumstances was to order an early trial date for September.
    The triple-murder case against Miller is alleged to have taken place in Braeton, St Catherine, on January 1, 2005.
    Miller was taken into custody on July 4 for allegedly breaching a condition of his bail.
    He was ordered to be at home from 6 p.m. to 6 a.m., but the police claim that when they went to his house on July 2, he was not there.
    Miller's lawyers told the court yesterday that Miller was at home but had to hide from the police because of constant threats and intimidation from them.

    Feared threats They said Miller fled the island in 2005 because a policeman had threatened him. The lawyers argued that Miller's July 2 detention was due partly to the death of Jamaica Urban Transit Company chairman Douglas Chambers, but so far no accusations have been made against Miller.

    • Don't let negative things break you, instead let it be your strength, your reason for growth. Life is for living and I won't spend my life feeling cheated and downtrodden.

  • #2
    This looks like a case for JFJ fi tek up. How dare they violate his human rights.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Bricktop View Post
      This looks like a case for JFJ fi tek up. How dare they violate his human rights.
      Come now BT .. you don't think HROs would have a problem with this? If a police can admit he made up evidence to present during a trial, how easy would it be for a police lock you up for 2 months?
      "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

      Comment


      • #4
        Should we then open up the prisons and let everyone out?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Bricktop View Post
          Should we then open up the prisons and let everyone out?
          Whats yuh point? Haven't heard anyone pushing for that.
          "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Lazie View Post
            Whats yuh point? Haven't heard anyone pushing for that.
            Didn't the "corrupt justice system" put these men behind bars? The only solution would be then to empty the jails and start over, no?

            Comment


            • #7
              His bail application was approved despite the fact he absconded, why it is even being mentioned is beyond me.
              It is likely because(as suggested..)the murder of Chambers, but of even more importance, it shows Judges already have the right to approve or deny bail.



              Blessed
              Last edited by Rockman; July 24, 2008, 07:19 PM.

              Comment


              • #8
                As far as I'm concerned, one cop admitting that he falsified evidence doesn't mean it's done by all cops. Go behind the scenes anywhere, especially in the US and alot of those cops will tell you they do it...they just won't be as brazen as that cop and admit it in public.

                My point, is I would not generalize for that one admission

                Comment

                Working...
                X