The PNP awakens from its slumber
Wednesday, July 16, 2008
Dr Peter David Phillips might well have just saved the People's National Party (PNP), by his bold decision to seek the leadership of the Opposition party.
We are inclined to believe the political scientists who say that the PNP is the natural party of Jamaicans. Unless conditions in the country are abysmal - as in 1980 - the electorate wants to retain the PNP. The short answer to the 'why' might be its late leader, Mr Michael Manley, and his father before him, Mr N W Manley.
The razor-thin margin of defeat in last year's general election could be interpreted as a further sign of the reluctance of the electorate to ditch the PNP. We believe that, without taking anything away from Mr Bruce Golding and the excellent campaign he ran, had the PNP leader, Mrs Portia Simpson Miller, been a more effective, astute and visionary leader, the party might have been handed an unprecedented fifth consecutive term in governance.
But insightful people will agree that the PNP has been going through a sort of metamorphosis in reverse, in which it is going from a mature party to one where petty politics and 'tracing' substitute for reason and vision. In this regard, it has gotten worse since its defeat at the polls on September 3, 2007.
In fact, if the truth be told, the slide developed definitive speed once Mr P J Patterson indicated he was stepping down as party leader, triggering a nasty fight to succeed him. In that race, Dr Peter Phillips, one of the combatants, narrowly lost to Mrs Simpson Miller.
But despite his loss, Dr Phillips, a PNP vice-president since 1999, has retained the veneer as the true leader of the party. One got the impression that Mrs Simpson Miller was occupying for a time but was never the intended leader.
Despite breaking historic ground as the first woman prime minister of Jamaica and at one stage enjoying the highest personality rating in the history of local polling, she could not convert that into political capital and a victory for her party.
Again, the short answer to the 'why' is the fact that she has been so underprepared for leadership, even after her many years in politics and her level of popularity.
The long and the short of it is that, more than anything else, a political party is about leadership. A party comprises a group of mostly like-minded persons who agree to support a common vision of leadership which they offer to an electorate. This is why a country has a vested interest in political parties being strong and ready to take power.
We know by experience that very often, it is not the most popular person who is the best leader. How frequently have we seen an excellent worker promoted to management, only to end up a dismal failure.
Both Dr Phillips and Mrs Simpson Miller were close to Michael Manley but there is little evidence that she spent the time learning to be a leader. Those with the outmoded view that Dr Phillips was one of the so-called 'Drumblair Group' fail to see this.
Since entering party politics in 1989, Dr Phillips has occupied more positions in the party than any other officer currently serving. It is that, we believe, which has made the difference between his preparation for leadership and that of Mrs Simpson Miller.
His decision to contest the leadership of the party shows that the PNP has now awaken from its slumber. It's about time.
Wednesday, July 16, 2008
Dr Peter David Phillips might well have just saved the People's National Party (PNP), by his bold decision to seek the leadership of the Opposition party.
We are inclined to believe the political scientists who say that the PNP is the natural party of Jamaicans. Unless conditions in the country are abysmal - as in 1980 - the electorate wants to retain the PNP. The short answer to the 'why' might be its late leader, Mr Michael Manley, and his father before him, Mr N W Manley.
The razor-thin margin of defeat in last year's general election could be interpreted as a further sign of the reluctance of the electorate to ditch the PNP. We believe that, without taking anything away from Mr Bruce Golding and the excellent campaign he ran, had the PNP leader, Mrs Portia Simpson Miller, been a more effective, astute and visionary leader, the party might have been handed an unprecedented fifth consecutive term in governance.
But insightful people will agree that the PNP has been going through a sort of metamorphosis in reverse, in which it is going from a mature party to one where petty politics and 'tracing' substitute for reason and vision. In this regard, it has gotten worse since its defeat at the polls on September 3, 2007.
In fact, if the truth be told, the slide developed definitive speed once Mr P J Patterson indicated he was stepping down as party leader, triggering a nasty fight to succeed him. In that race, Dr Peter Phillips, one of the combatants, narrowly lost to Mrs Simpson Miller.
But despite his loss, Dr Phillips, a PNP vice-president since 1999, has retained the veneer as the true leader of the party. One got the impression that Mrs Simpson Miller was occupying for a time but was never the intended leader.
Despite breaking historic ground as the first woman prime minister of Jamaica and at one stage enjoying the highest personality rating in the history of local polling, she could not convert that into political capital and a victory for her party.
Again, the short answer to the 'why' is the fact that she has been so underprepared for leadership, even after her many years in politics and her level of popularity.
The long and the short of it is that, more than anything else, a political party is about leadership. A party comprises a group of mostly like-minded persons who agree to support a common vision of leadership which they offer to an electorate. This is why a country has a vested interest in political parties being strong and ready to take power.
We know by experience that very often, it is not the most popular person who is the best leader. How frequently have we seen an excellent worker promoted to management, only to end up a dismal failure.
Both Dr Phillips and Mrs Simpson Miller were close to Michael Manley but there is little evidence that she spent the time learning to be a leader. Those with the outmoded view that Dr Phillips was one of the so-called 'Drumblair Group' fail to see this.
Since entering party politics in 1989, Dr Phillips has occupied more positions in the party than any other officer currently serving. It is that, we believe, which has made the difference between his preparation for leadership and that of Mrs Simpson Miller.
His decision to contest the leadership of the party shows that the PNP has now awaken from its slumber. It's about time.
Comment