RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why the difference?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    Why the difference?

    NYPD members killed an unarmed man and were amazingly found not guilty. Today protest actions will continue to show disgust at the outcome of the trial.

    5 years ago the CMU (Country's Murderous Unit) killed 4 unarmed people in Kraal and amazingly the damn killers walk free. The head of the Unit called it, "The Mother of All Acquittal!" There were some idiots that even wanted this murderer to be commissioner of police. As a matter of fact, wasn't there a big dance the night of the verdict? Wow ... what a difference.
    "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Could it be that Kingston/Pmore Jamaica has a high crime rate that rivals Baghdad?

    You think its fair for you to generalise that thier shouldnt be a difference ?
    THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

    "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


    "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

    Comment

    • #3
      Several things at play here. We have become so terrified that we think when police kill somebody it must be justified. The NYPD was able to prove that Sean Bell and friends had no weapons. What did our court case prove?

      I could say more, but me weary.


      BLACK LIVES MATTER

      Comment

      • #4
        Originally posted by X View Post
        Could it be that Kingston/Pmore Jamaica has a high crime rate that rivals Baghdad?

        You think its fair for you to generalise that thier shouldnt be a difference ?
        Kraal deh a Kingston/ Pmore? If not whats the relevance? I think the comparison is fair. There was outrage at the acquittal of the NYPD killers, but inna Jamaica the head of the murderous unit record a tune, and there was a big dance when he got away with murder.

        If yuh cyaan see the difference then ...
        "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

        Comment

        • #5
          Yuh choose to be concerned now again, I see.


          BLACK LIVES MATTER

          Comment

          • #6
            Originally posted by Mosiah View Post
            Several things at play here. We have become so terrified that we think when police kill somebody it must be justified. The NYPD was able to prove that Sean Bell and friends had no weapons. What did our court case prove?

            I could say more, but me weary.
            Didn't the Kraal case prove that the gun found at the scene was collected from a certain Don from East Kingston by two JCF members and taken to the scene where the gun was planted?
            "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

            Comment

            • #7
              We have become so terrified.......Lazie Mo answer the question from a Jamaican Living in Ja , So are you terrified of living in NY as a black man to accept what happened to Bell ?

              Again you generalisation shoot you down.
              THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

              "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


              "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

              Comment

              • #8
                Yes! Which says a lot about our justice system and all sorts of things.

                Mi tiyad!


                BLACK LIVES MATTER

                Comment

                • #9
                  I don't have any interest in this one. I think unnu suppose to know what I think about the two cases. Basically, injustice is everywhere. Race, socio-economic status, politics - they all play there part in America and Jamaica. At the end of the day, the BIG man wins, whatever colour he may be.


                  BLACK LIVES MATTER

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Originally posted by X View Post
                    We have become so terrified.......Lazie Mo answer the question from a Jamaican Living in Ja , So are you terrified of living in NY as a black man to accept what happened to Bell ?

                    Again you generalisation shoot you down.
                    The fact is I'm terrified of the NYPD. How many times have they murdered unarmed black men and walk free?
                    "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      I think yuh finally dealing with reality, The police in Jamaica are an escape for Governments lack of social responsibility , rightly or wrongly they will enforce the Law with the meager resources they have and the fastest way they see fit.

                      Why Government naah adress it socially and people terrified so dem accept it as the norm.
                      THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

                      "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


                      "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        HAHAHHAHHAA! Are you serious?!?!

                        Thanks, X. What would I do without you!


                        BLACK LIVES MATTER

                        Comment

                        Previous template Next
                        Working...
                        X