RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Danville Walker’s citizenship to be discussed at ECJ meeting

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Danville Walker’s citizenship to be discussed at ECJ meeting

    The issue of Director of Elections Danville Walker's dual citizenship is among several matters down for discussion at the first meeting of the Electoral Commission of Jamaica (ECJ).

    The Commission's Chairman, Professor Errol Miller, says members will undertake a careful examination of the recent developments involving Mr. Walker.

    However Professor Miller says the issue is not being treated as a crisis.

    "We have learnt of the matter in the same way everybody has learnt of it and the matter will be taken up at the meeting on the 16th January. We will address it, look at it and examine it, we see no emergency in the matter we will deal with it in a careful manner and we will look at all the implications and so on but we are not going to deal with it on a crisis basis that's for sure," said Prodessor Miller.

    Last week lawyers representing People's National Party (PNP) candidate for Western Portland, Abe Dabdoub, questioned Mr. Walker's eligibility for the post.

    Lead attorney Gayle Nelson argued that under Section Three of the Electoral Commission (Interim) Act of 2006, Mr. Walker should be disqualified from holding the post of Director of Elections.

    The Section notes that a person will be disqualified from holding the post if that person is not a citizen of Jamaica, not resident in Jamaica, or by his own act, has acknowledged allegiance, obedience or adherence to a foreign power or state.

    The matter was heard during the election petition brought by Mr. Dabdoub against Member of Parliament Daryl Vaz.

    In the meantime, United States based attorney-at-law George Cromarko, who represents parliamentarian Daryl Vaz, is now giving testimony in the Supreme Court.

    This as the High Court continues its hearing into the election petition filed by defeated PNP candidate, Abe Dabdoub.

    Mr. Dabdoub wants the court to remove Mr. Vaz, who represents West Portland in the House of Parliament, claiming he holds dual citizenship.

    Jamaica's constitution bars persons who pledge allegiance to another country from holding political office.

    Last month lawyers representing Mr. Dabdoub submitted documents which they claim show that Mr. Vaz had been travelling as an American citizen even after he was sworn in as a government minister.
    "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

  • #2
    but is WHO appoint walker? why is an issue NOW? they should be prevented from raising this issue....if you want equity youmust come to the court with clean hands.

    Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

    Comment


    • #3
      gamma, why does it matter who appointed him?! the man either lied about his citizenship or just didn't know that a fariner could not hold that position.

      he needs to step!


      BLACK LIVES MATTER

      Comment


      • #4
        there is a third possibility....that there was full disclosure and he was appointed nonetheless and in that case it certainly is of some significance because in that case they, who appointed him, should not be able to challenge his appointment for lack of proper standing.

        yes he should go, but it is significant who initiates it, it must be someone with the proper standing and who has "clean hands".

        Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Gamma View Post
          there is a third possibility....that there was full disclosure and he was appointed nonetheless and in that case it certainly is of some significance because in that case they, who appointed him, should not be able to challenge his appointment for lack of proper standing.

          yes he should go, but it is significant who initiates it, it must be someone with the proper standing and who has "clean hands".
          Easy yuhself Gamma ... Mosiah in his ever emotional stance will not see that. Dem figet who coined the phrase, "the law is not a shackle".
          "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

          Comment


          • #6
            Wrong again, Lazie. I fully understand Gamma's third point. However, I believe that his appointment was a bipartisan matter. So, your wish that we could blame the "law is not a shackle" people just went up in smoke!

            I belive he did not realise that he was ineligible, but he needs to get to stepping! NOW!

            Where have I been emotional on this issue, Lazie? I guess it's too much to expect sensible, mature discussion from you this year.


            BLACK LIVES MATTER

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Mosiah View Post
              Wrong again, Lazie. I fully understand Gamma's third point. However, I believe that his appointment was a bipartisan matter. So, your wish that we could blame the "law is not a shackle" people just went up in smoke!

              I belive he did not realise that he was ineligible, but he needs to get to stepping! NOW!

              Where have I been emotional on this issue, Lazie? I guess it's too much to expect sensible, mature discussion from you this year.
              You believe? Sounds like yuh need fi get it straight first. Yuh comrade in arms posted here that PJ appointed him, suh how all of a sudden its bipartisan? ... if yuh believe suh.
              "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

              Comment


              • #8
                or the fourth possibility, whomever appointed him knew he was a dual citizen but did not know that it disqualifies him from holding the position... in which case it matters not who appointed him... he has to either relinquish his position or renounce his citizenship to one country... in either scenario, his credibility is shot...
                'to get what we've never had, we MUST do what we've never done'

                Comment


                • #9
                  Such a friggin tangled web has been woven. Brer Anancy couldn't write this script any better
                  Life is a system of half-truths and lies, opportunistic, convenient evasion.”
                  - Langston Hughes

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Fire him first, the find out if the state should charge anyone for approving this illegal appointment.
                    The same type of thinking that created a problem cannot be used to solve the problem.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      just too many levels of incompetence... its alarming...
                      'to get what we've never had, we MUST do what we've never done'

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Gamma View Post
                        but is WHO appoint walker? why is an issue NOW? they should be prevented from raising this issue....if you want equity youmust come to the court with clean hands.
                        I wonder if you hired someone not qualified to hold a job if you would on learning the fact seek to correct same?

                        It matters not who appointed Mr. Walker, if he should not have held the post he must go.

                        Aside: In my opinion, Members of Parliament and holders of certain other sensitive positions within government must be citizens of Jamaica and Jamaica only! ...one such position is Director of Elections!
                        "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          And what is the basis of your opinion ?

                          Who cared before the PNP 'discovered' the issue ?

                          How relevant is this in light of Jamaica's history since 1972 ?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Maudib View Post
                            And what is the basis of your opinion ?

                            Who cared before the PNP 'discovered' the issue ?

                            How relevant is this in light of Jamaica's history since 1972 ?
                            Well...wouldn't it be nice if those in 'high places' where beholden to Russia?

                            Some...party loyalty...such fools running at...mmmm? ...appears to be self-interest...but???? ...act the fool against themselves!
                            Oooh well????
                            "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              How is the average Jamaica/American BEHOLDEN to American ?

                              Are you BEHOLDEN to America ?

                              What yuh gwine duh.. trade Jamaican Intelligence info to the CIA..

                              Unnuh is some real sample.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X