although it is good to get rid of persons not performing, especially at management level where salaries are high, the money saved initially will be spent on rehiring managers, but should be spent on improving the product
Didn't she say that the positions, with the exception of the HR Manager, were redundant?
Get rid of some of the top heavy managers and get more folks in the field (a them actually doing the work), and give them benefits too, e.g. the folks a Riverton
“Life is a system of half-truths and lies, opportunistic, convenient evasion.” - Langston Hughes
so she says but in the true scheme of things look for hirings in other areas, redundancy excercises are short term, usually new posts follow eventually
thats how it is to be done... fire all who are overpaid and unproductive... the remaining managers will be pressed to get more (just work) from the workers or they will be out of work too... there's always an abundance of workers ready to do the job...
i am 100% behind this move... got to clear the morass blocking production... for too long too many people don't take their jobs seriosly... they don't show up for work... find every excuse in the world not to go to work... when they do go to work, they leave early... the work is incomplete... enough is enough... for each salary, 3 people could be hired and the govt have money leff over for other things...
'to get what we've never had, we MUST do what we've never done'
Comment