RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How comes this wasn't posted?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • How comes this wasn't posted?

    Class vs classless
    published: Sunday | November 25, 2007

    Dawn Ritch, Columinist
    When the Prime Minister says of the leadership of the People's National Party (PNP) and, particularly, the Opposition Leader, that 'Dem dark bad', he is only demonstrating what a common man he really is. He may affect a slightly middle-class accent, but his constant gesticulation and use of nasty language reveal him as irredeemably lower class.

    Phrases such as "intellectual depravity" and "termites infested in the brain" would be surprising coming from any political leader, were they not so disgusting, and especially coming from a prime minister. I don't know why Golding thinks it so necessary to attack Portia Simpson Miller personally, except perhaps that he's convinced that this is the only reason why he was able to eke out a narrow electoral victory in the first place. He obviously believes this is a winning strategy. It may be class warfare, but he is hardly the person best suited to wage it.

    Were he confident of his own social standing and relevance in this country, he would not find it necessary to ensure that Desmond McKenzie stands alongside him in every single photograph. At least Simpson Miller is confident enough of her own self-worth to have Lisa Hanna beside her. Hanna is not only better looking, but a lot better educated than Desmond KcKenzie, and certainly far more intelligent and cultured than both Golding and McKenzie combined.

    Golding is trying to make Simpson Miller's concern for, and identification with, the Jamaican working class sound like old-time PNP communism. The purpose of demonising her thusly is to make rich Jamaican white people feel afraid that she's going to take away their wealth and give it to poor black people. This is nonsense, but the mere thought of it is enough to frighten many of them anyway.

    Black capitalism
    They have just had 16 years of P.J. Patterson, who ran a capitalist government; but it was black capitalism. When he came to office he saw that it was only the Jamaican browns who were getting ahead. His predecessor, Michael Manley, had been the country's last brown socialist. Patterson looked around and saw all those ill-educated brown people buying yachts, and started to give out everything to black people. Under him came the birth of the black bourgeoisie. Usually professionals, they suddenly started to have loads of cash and inordinate influence. Understandably, this pleased neither the brown people nor the white people.

    By 'brown people' I mean everybody who is not white, and that includes Syrians, Lebanese, Jews, Indians, Chinese and the mixtures thereof. These are all the people who travel to America and are alarmed to discover that they are not 'topanaris'. They are the descendants of the poor brownings who had no family money, but who started to make it in the opportunities presented by the 1950s and 1960s.

    They have all had to take a back seat since 1989, and comfort themselves with their smoked salmon and champagne. Today, they buy two-bedroom apartments in Jacks Hill for $26 million just because they can. They are the children of the first brownings with knotty heads who made it big. Some of them still have knotty heads, but there was nothing they hated more than to see people from working-class backgrounds 'arriving' all of a sudden under Patterson.

    Sixteen years of that under Patterson was quite enough. Simpson Miller was a threat, so they didn't care what the face of the Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) looked like, just as long as it was somebody put up by the JLP. So they got Bruce.

    The irony is that Simpson Miller is regarded as the first working-class black capitalist woman to lead the country. Regardless of how she cares to describe herself, I don't believe that she's either working-class or black.

    Race is not only appearance, it is also accent and attitude, and it certainly is not grammar. Were it grammar, there are a whole lot of white people in Jamaica who could justifiably be regarded as black. Race is such a fluid thing in this country, that the word 'browning' is often used to describe not only brown Jamaicans, but any foreign white person who appears friendly.

    Simpson Miller has beautiful manners and a physical bearing that cannot be taught. They can only be bred. Somebody brought her up that way, and I doubt it was the late Ray Hadeed, who, though a kindly man, wasn't noted for any polish. Furthermore, her physiognomy suggests that she's as much a racial mixture as any of the rest of us.

    The long friendship between Hadeed and Simpson Miller has a certain societal significance for Jamaica. Neither of them would have been publicly accepted by white Jamaica. Even some of the monied brownings, just one remove from working class themselves, would have found their grammar embarrassing. But it certainly meant that both could form close personal attachments outside their own racial type.

    No record of rudeness
    It should be noted that there is no public record whatsoever of Simpson Miller having been rude, personal or insulting towards Bruce Golding. Not from a political platform, or a party conference podium, nor in any press interview. Indeed, she hasn't been rude about a single soul.

    Nevertheless, the press, Golding and her other political opponents, habitually portray Simpson Miller as a dunce and a virago. And this, despite a total lack of any evidence to support either contention. When she said 'Don't draw my tongue', she was warning them. And, indeed, her tongue has never been drawn, unlike all of theirs.

    Anybody interested in social harmony would wish for a Jamaica in which no particular racial type predominated either socially, politically or financially. Once it was white, next it was brown, then it was black, and now under Golding's leadership, it would like to pretend to be white again. Hence, his desire to caricature his political opposition as 'Dem dark bad'. It appears he embraces the racial stereotype of black people not only being dark, but stupid.

    Simpson Miller has never been so classless as to term her opponent's brain anything at all, much less termite-ridden. She has never suggested that rather than jump on a political platform, he should dance in a nightclub instead. Nor has she spread any rumours about his personal life. What is more, the cartoonists have given every support possible to Bruce Golding.

    Three months later, there has still not been a single cartoon of his wife Lorna in her undergarments, and very few of him. They're still lampooning Simpson Miller and drawing her husband Errald in his underwear. Golding's classlessness has, therefore, been supported by certain boorish elements of our press. I would never have thought it possible that the so-called members of the Jamaican establishment could behave in such a vulgar fashion, nor that such a lowbred farce could pass as public commentary.
    Last edited by Karl; November 27, 2007, 08:10 AM.

  • #2
    Jamaica has a far way to go if this is regarded as social commentary.

    This rhetoric is insulting to even a person of moderate intelligence.

    Damn.. it's as if their entire existence is a class/race struggle.. serious therapy is needed.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Maudib View Post
      Jamaica has a far way to go if this is regarded as social commentary.

      This rhetoric is insulting to even a person of moderate intelligence.

      Damn.. it's as if their entire existence is a class/race struggle.. serious therapy is needed.
      The truth is Bruce and the JLP has behaved in a manner to which Portia has not lowered herself. Yet, you have persons like you who uphold Bruce and demonize Portia. The perplexing question is; why?
      "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

      Comment


      • #4
        Portia and the politics of class

        Portia and the politics of class
        HEART TO HEARTBetty Ann Blaine
        Tuesday, November 27, 2007


        Dear Reader,
        Just when everybody thought that the market-driven, capitalist economic machinery was in full gear and kicking, and that the ideological debate was dead and buried, the issue of social class has reappeared on the national agenda.

        Ever since her ascendancy to the top political post in the country, the former prime minister and now leader of the opposition, Portia Simpson Miller, has been talking about her rise from humble beginnings. It sounded good at first. After all, who would not admire and be proud of someone who rose from the bowels of the poor to become the first woman prime minister of any country? Time and time again, the country would be reminded by Portia of her rise to fame from lowly beginnings, but little did many of us know that what Portia was uttering was more than words of self-commendation. It appears that what we have here is the re-emergence of the ideological debate on class, reminiscent of the period of the seventies.

        The statement made by the opposition leader this past week in response to comments made by Prime Minister Bruce Golding at the Jamaica Labour Party's (JLP's) annual conference makes it clear that she believes that class is at the root of the stalemate between herself and Bruce Golding. One has to ask the question, "Is Portia suffering from her own personal beliefs and complexes, or is there a rebirth of the socialist ideology of class being embraced and articulated by the PNP?"

        There is no doubt that there is ample room for a serious debate on class and colour in Jamaica. Not only does the country continue to be stymied by the structural problems of inequality and differentiation, but the gap between the rich and the poor is increasing exponentially. The latest figures rate Jamaica as 11th on the scale of those countries with widening gaps between the rich and the poor. The problem we have here is that it will be extremely difficult for the PNP to advance any serious arguments about class conspiracy or class biases being perpetrated by their JLP opponents, given their own record of governance.

        The fundamental difficulty is whether or not the PNP can prove that its close to 20 years of rule resulted in any substantial shift in class relations or class stratification. While official statistics showed a slight decrease in poverty levels, the position of the poor remained largely static under the former PNP administration. In fact, the serious problem of child poverty increased steadily under their watch.

        Not even the declaration from former PNP Prime Minister PJ Patterson that his time was black man time resulted in any significant shift in the class structure. Under 'black man time', labour unions and the rights of the working class lost significant traction, and every indicator pointed to the abandonment of the class struggle in the aggressive pursuit of the free market, capitalist economic exigencies.

        The successive scandals that have been rocking the PNP, including the persistent Trafigura and Cuban light bulb probes, serve to confirm the perception of the abandonment of the poor for the "big" and "special interest". Many people are of the opinion that 'black man time' was only for a handful of special 'black men' and some who are not so black - those who are members of the special PNP 'inner-party club'.

        Of all the scandals, the Cuban light bulb saga is perhaps the most glaring in its contradictions. There is no way that any gift to the country for distribution to the poor should have cost us any more than a couple million dollars. For the PNP administration to have racked up a bill of close to $280 million is immoral at best. Was there anybody inside the PNP whose conscience did not allow him or her to ask the question, "How can these bulbs be distributed at the lowest cost possible to the country?"

        Was there nobody in the PNP that argued that the hundreds of millions spent could be utilised for urgently needed poor relief? Was there nobody inside the PNP who had the moral suasion to juxtapose the hundreds of millions squandered on handing out and screwing in light bulbs to the plight of pensioners - many of whom are living below the poverty line - or the poor families living off less than $1,000 per week on the government's PATH programme? Was there anybody inside the PNP who thought about those children who have been relegated to child labour - those we see vending on the streets at all hours of the day and night? Was there anybody who gave any thought to the growing numbers of homeless and indigent all around us?

        The problem with rhetoric, whether it's about the class struggle, or about belief in God, is that words must match the deeds. You can't proclaim to love the poor, but your actions demonstrate the opposite.

        Portia has it all wrong. Yes, there are very clear divisions of class and colour in Jamaica, but one doesn't have to come from the bowels of the poor to understand and appreciate those dynamics. The PNP's own father of socialism, Michael Manley, is perhaps the best example of that. If the Opposition leader wants to wage a class war, then she had better be fully aware of contradictions within her own party.
        With love,
        bab2609@yahoo.com
        "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

        Comment


        • #5
          Demonize ?

          Portia could never be my Prime Minister. She brings NOTHING to the table.

          She has been weighed, measured and found wanting.

          Don't seek to lower my standard because of your cult responsiblities.

          I take Jamaica and its predicament seriously. I LIVE here.

          This is a time for SERIOUS people.

          Comment


          • #6
            I hope Dawn Ritch is taking notes.

            This article is On point.

            Comment


            • #7
              Fuelling the class war
              published: Tuesday | November 27, 2007



              Vernon Daley
              Portia Simpson Miller needs to meet with greater equanimity the cruel criticisms that naturally accompany the lives of public persons. It's hard to imagine that she has been in public life for some three decades without developing a more resistant armour to the slings and arrows of detractors.
              I always thought that one of the traits of politicians was the ability to roll with the punches and give as good as they get. In this respect the Opposition Leader seems quite an untypical political figure.

              Fuss over PM statement
              Mrs. Simpson Miller has recently been making a fuss over statements made by Prime Minister Bruce Golding at his party's annual conference two Sundays ago. The Prime Minister accused the People's National Party (PNP) of "intellectual depravity" and suggested that termites had "infested their brain".

              The comments were unnecessarily stinging, to say the least, and we can only hope that Mr. Golding will resist the temptation to be similarly harsh in the future. He does have a greater responsibility, as Prime Minister, to keep public discourse at a minimum level of decency.

              However, the real mischief in all of this was created by Mrs. Simpson Miller, herself. Following Mr. Golding's speech, the PNP president accused him of waging a class war on her party and sug-gested that she was the primary target of his verbal assault.

              Gender bias
              Mrs. Simpson Miller apparently believes that every criticism of her and the PNP under her leadership is born out of some class or gender bias. In reacting to Mr. Golding's comments, the Opposition Leader went into her background, talking about where she came from and who her parents were. My question is: who cares?

              This tired attempt to play on the sympathies of poor Jamaicans is not only cheap but dangerous politics.

              Jamaica doesn't need political leaders who are about fuelling class and other kinds of divisions to mask their own inadequacies. When one looks back over the four decades of this country's independence all one can see is the great opportunities missed because of the divisions fostered by political leaders. This new generation of Jamaicans, to which I proudly belong, is more than a bit fed up with the kind of talk which pushes people apart rather than brings them together.

              We want a new kind of leadership that understands that for this country to move forward we can't have some people pulling one way and some people the other. Everybody has to be moving in the same direction. Is Mrs Simpson Miller capable of helping to chart that course and that vision or is she a relic of the country's divisive political past?

              Hypocritical comments
              I have to say, also, that I find some of the Opposition Leader's comments about election spending hypocritical. During the run-up to the last general elections, she complained about what was felt to be big money backing the Jamaica Labour Party and on several political platforms declared that she was not prepared to sell out the interest of Jamaica to a few powerful business people here.

              She is obviously of the view that it was big money that cost her the elections and she uses each opportunity she gets to raise questions about the money the JLP got to run its campaign.

              Well, the entire Jamaica knows that some of those who were supporting the JLP in the last elections were on previous occasions fully in the corner of the PNP. I can't remember Mrs. Simpson Miller com-plaining about the money flowing to her party's coffers at that time.
              Send comments to: vernon.daley@gmail.com
              "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

              Comment


              • #8
                Mr. Daley needed to use the title, "Portia Exposed!" Only the idiots that claim dem a comrade quick fi jump to har defense.
                "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Karl View Post
                  The truth is Bruce and the JLP has behaved in a manner to which Portia has not lowered herself. Yet, you have persons like you who uphold Bruce and demonize Portia. The perplexing question is; why?
                  Not true Karl.

                  Your memory fails you again. The first time you forget that she drew "first blood" with her non-concession speech on elction night. That was followed up with the "worst nightmare" speech a week or 2 later.

                  You clearly forget that on the campaign trail, she called him "the little man in the green shirt with his few friends".

                  Anyway, to me, all of this is fine! That is how the game is played and I dont understand how people feigning sensitivity and gentility now. Politics is not a "dainty girl chile" sport, it is for grown ups and one needs a quick wit and a thick spin to play well. If one cannot stand the heat....try another profession!!

                  As to demonizing, WE ALL NEED TO GET REAL. The basis of demonizing to me is not stage presence, rather is GUNMANSHIP! Bruce and Portia run in garrisons. Bruce has seemingly disavowed the donship politics (that remains to be seen, but so far so good), but Portia clearly has not. "Pain" Land is as bad as ever AND PNP garrisons are out of control. They are at war with each other and PNP is by far the biggest killers of PNP at the moment. Recall that documentary where Manley's daughter took the UK journalist into somewhere near Jungle. PNP streets were at permanent war with each other and the only safe passage was thru the JLP area for some ofthem!!! ROTFLMAO. Nobody here commented on this!

                  Portia and Paulwell are the key links to the PNP big dons (Eastern Dons are famous) and they are the foundation of party fund raising. That is why Paulwell is untouchable.

                  I dont for a moment excuse the JLP either, as even if they are at relative peace at the moment, they are still armed and dangerous. As long as either side is "empowered" we have a problem on the Rock.

                  In summary, we can all argue here about who sai what on stage, but it is IRRELEVANT and pointless. The reall issues stare us in the face but we whistle and hold our heads straight.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    We need to stop talking about the red herring class war when we have a real war going on. Is class war killing over 1200 people a year???

                    It seems we are prepared to go to any length to avoid the obvious! These damn politicians are presiding over a SHIStSTEM that is killing our brothers and sisters in record numbers.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I think Karl is demonstrating his
                      point to both you and Lazie (where they constantly demonize Nanny P).

                      Karl whenever she speaks; the slaves that work in the great house and get piece of the prok shank comes out with guns balzing (saying all kind of nonsense) Why?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Jawge View Post
                        I think Karl is demonstrating his
                        point to both you and Lazie (where they constantly demonize Nanny P).

                        Karl whenever she speaks; the slaves that work in the great house and get piece of the prok shank comes out with guns balzing (saying all kind of nonsense) Why?
                        You, Karl, Dawn Ritch and the other poppyshows can play merry go round all unuh want. Who waan call it class war ... feel free ... the reality is Portia was a damn embarrassment as PM and continues to prove me right with her utterances as Opposition Leader. How the hell anyone in their right mind would want Portia leading our country for 5 more years?
                        "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          whey yuh have 'gainst pork shank?

                          Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Maybe him never taste one that have have barbecued properly..ehh
                            Solidarity is not a matter of well wishing, but is sharing the very same fate whether in victory or in death.
                            Che Guevara.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              And washed down with Sorrell.

                              Burpppppp! 'Scuse me! LoL

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X