Originally posted by Assasin
View Post
I can accept that I have a particular opinion that it's probable that the Miami issue was already an item on the table and not new (because the agreement was wrapped up quickly and significant new items probably would require time to study) and you looking at the same report come to a different opinion. I can accept the difference in opinion and am open to correction by someone with credible insider info. Let's agree to disagree on this.
Jamaica does not, unfortunately, have a history of independent investigative journalism so we are all reduced to parsing whatever releases are issued by entities in the news.
Whatever investigative journalism exists in Jamaica, the reportage is always suspect (of being subservient to powerful interests) because of the extremely narrow ownership base of the media and the overwhelming power of 2 or 3 media bosses over the livelihood of journalists.
Comment