I think you are blending two different issues: a company dominating an industry and compensation for comapny executives.
I am dealing specifically with executive pay. I am saying that govt policy should NOT be involved in trying to control what executives of public comapnies are paid. That is for the shareholders and if necessary, the courts to determine.
For example the Home Depot CEO got an outrageous golden parachute. I don't think he deserved it. Nonetheless it is a public company with a board and shareholders. They should deal with it.
Also for the record I have no problem IN PRINCIPLE with a company making
truck load of profits as you put it. The real issue is what they do to make that kind of money.
I am dealing specifically with executive pay. I am saying that govt policy should NOT be involved in trying to control what executives of public comapnies are paid. That is for the shareholders and if necessary, the courts to determine.
For example the Home Depot CEO got an outrageous golden parachute. I don't think he deserved it. Nonetheless it is a public company with a board and shareholders. They should deal with it.
Also for the record I have no problem IN PRINCIPLE with a company making
truck load of profits as you put it. The real issue is what they do to make that kind of money.
Comment