RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Top A Di Pops

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Top A Di Pops



    certain guy need to do a refresher course in offside...commentators dumber than slur x

  • #2
    BS that BT ..... that should not have been allowed.
    "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

    Comment


    • #3
      And also, WAS top of the table for a mere second, blink and you missed it.
      What a goal by Pogba, and Cavani proved today, he can play an entire game.

      Comment


      • #4
        what you mean should not have been allowed? the ball wasn't headed to rodri...it would headed to mings who miscontrolled it at that point rodri is no longer in an offside position & has every right to tackle mings...

        Comment


        • #5
          Lazie knows better BT.
          The only time TRUTH will hurt you...is if you ignore it long enough

          HL

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by HL View Post
            Lazie knows better BT.
            ..obviously ... why you think Pep got agitated when asked about it?
            "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

            Comment


            • #7
              what's your reasoning as to why the goal should have been disallowed?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Bricktop View Post
                what's your reasoning as to why the goal should have been disallowed?
                Know what ... just image that it was MU that benefitted from that call. What would have been your reaction?
                "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Bricktop View Post
                  what's your reasoning as to why the goal should have been disallowed?
                  Now you see the FA has implemented a change?
                  "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Lazie View Post
                    Now you see the FA has implemented a change?
                    so if there has now been a CHANGE that means it was a perfectly legal goal...what's the issue?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Bricktop View Post
                      so if there has now been a CHANGE that means it was a perfectly legal goal...what's the issue?

                      It should not have been allowed. That is why they ran and changed it. No wonder Pep got upset when asked about it.
                      "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Something of a renaissance, it has NEVER occurred before and too farfetched to imagine.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          what do you mean it should not have been allowed? FIFA said it was CORRECTLY allowed...they now don't want it to be allowed so they CHANGED it...now tell me why this eediat lineswoman raise her flag for offside when we have VAR & it wasn't a clear & obvious call?
                          Last edited by Bricktop; January 26, 2021, 05:21 PM.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X