He understood the question, just that answering it would lead to a concession, ergo he avoided it by employing dilatory tactics.
Most unfortunate because what it says is he isn't intelligent enough to decipher .., and at the very least, unable to to express his thoughts(exactly what he accuses me of) clearly by wrongly questioning the language validity of what I said, despite it was said in English.
Most unfortunate because what it says is he isn't intelligent enough to decipher .., and at the very least, unable to to express his thoughts(exactly what he accuses me of) clearly by wrongly questioning the language validity of what I said, despite it was said in English.
Comment