RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

City not interested in Sanchez....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • City not interested in Sanchez....

    ....http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/42697824

    Excellent business approach Pep & company. It's our way or the highway.
    The only time TRUTH will hurt you...is if you ignore it long enough

    HL

  • #2
    £350,000/week? he's all yours boy u...no way we're paying the 5th best player on our team that kinda money...

    Comment


    • #3
      What a difference a half a season makes,it was only a few months you offered Arsenal 60m land him.
      What can Sanchez do on a mre worthy team, he can score more goals. Sterlong ss a runaway train(freaking remarkable) ,my guess is he would at the very least be leveled with Aguero..,who are the other three players..?
      Remember, the only reason you bpught Sterling was to fulfill some England player quota.

      Comment


      • #4
        alexis sanchez is not a center forward...he would be competing with sterling & sane for playing time (not aquero) & he isn't better than either...keep splashing the cash...you still can't catch city

        Comment


        • #5
          Sanchez is faaaaar better than you think,he is too good a player fir Man U to risk City landing him, if we had assurances that he would be tucked away on your bench then we would not have gotten involved.
          Besides, his experience will be greatly appreciated in our CL games.
          Sanchez is the same player on both fronts, club and national team.

          Comment


          • #6
            he's also 30 years old...like i said...have fun paying those wages...we are not willing to pay that amount of money to the 5th best player on our team...let's see how it turns out for you

            Comment


            • #7
              He is more of a Defoe type as opposed to a Rooney, he shows no sign of aging.
              I think he has a full two years of bordering peak level left in him.
              The salary isn't a problem, the number 7 jersey is probably our most marketed one, amd I am sure he will have a point to prove to City after being unjustly snubbed.
              I always wanted players good with the ball at their feet at Man U, and Sanchez fits the bill.

              Comment


              • #8
                Rockman. You should know when to stop.

                Stop.

                Thanks.
                The only time TRUTH will hurt you...is if you ignore it long enough

                HL

                Comment


                • #9
                  Stop what HL?
                  He has a point to prove to your club.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Let him prove it to boyu.

                    Not paying 35 million.
                    The only time TRUTH will hurt you...is if you ignore it long enough

                    HL

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      but would have paid £60m prior to the start of the season?
                      Unfortunately, Pogba is rubbishing another of your assessments.
                      I am perfectly fine with opening up the cheque book to land Sanchez, and for multiple reasons too.
                      He has proven himself everywgere he has played.
                      Isn't it remakable that old man Valencia is without a doubt our chosen right back player?
                      Why the diminutive Sanchez is so effective is the lesson for Martial, Rashford, and Lingard.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        so let's say we pay sanchez £350,000/week...kdb's new deal isn't gonna pay him near that...where does that leave us...wouldn't help us in negotiations with sane & sterling's new deals either or when we try to sign new players in the summer & beyond...but good luck with that

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          We finally get to the real reason.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            ahmm...that was always the reason we halted our pursuit...that's the difference between a well run club with a clear long term strategy...& boy u

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Bricktop View Post
                              ahmm...that was always the reason we halted our pursuit...that's the difference between a well run club with a clear long term strategy...& boy u

                              "that's the difference between a well run club with a clear long term strategy...& boy u"

                              Seriously? City is where they are because of their rich owners. MU is one of the richest clubs in the world, despite the current owners.

                              The World's Most Valuable Soccer Teams 2017
                              "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X