RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fifa will not rule on Tevez saga

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Fifa will not rule on Tevez saga


    Tevez is keen to move to Old Trafford

    Fifa has recommended that the Carlos Tevez dispute should go to the Court of Arbitration for Sport.


    The Argentine striker wants to join Manchester United, but West Ham and businessman Kia Joorabchian both claim to own the player.

    The Football Association and the Premier League asked Fifa to rule on the matter.
    But a Fifa statement read: "Fifa has recommended that West Ham and Carlos Tevez seek arbitration at CAS."
    It continued: "Under the present circumstances this was deemed to be the best approach and in the interest of all parties.

    "What is more, we also believe this to be the fastest way to solve this impasse."



    CAS is yet to comment on whether it will hear the case, but BBC Sport understands Joorabchian is considering taking the matter to the High Court in order to push through a deal before the transfer window closes on 31 August.
    United are expected to pay up to £30m for Tevez, but the transfer has reached an impasse over who should receive the fee.

    Tevez is registered as a West Ham player, but Joorabchian claims he still owns the striker's economic rights and is therefore entitled to the transfer fee.

    However, West Ham ripped up an agreement they had with Joorabchian - which broke Premier League rules - and they now claim any deal with United can only go ahead with their say-so.

    The Premier League, which is also insisting that any fee must go to West Ham, met with Fifa and the Football Association on Monday to discuss the issue.

    Fifa spokesman Andreas Herren said: "Under the circumstances it was felt it would be in the best interest of all parties to take this course.

    "It looks like being the fastest way of resolving this matter.
    "It is not a refusal by Fifa to get involved, quite the contrary. It is a recommendation by Fifa to opt for this way."
    The Premier League welcomed Fifa's decision.

    A spokesman said: "The Premier League and FA are grateful to Fifa for considering this issue.

    "We are supportive of the recommendation that if all parties are in agreement the matter should be referred to the Court of Arbitration for Sport."

    West Ham also said they were happy for CAS to rule on the issue. "We're happy for the matter to go to CAS if it is with the agreement of all parties," a West Ham statement said.
    "Only when you drink from the river of silence shall you indeed sing. And when you have reached the mountain top, then you shall begin to climb. And when the earth shall claim your limbs, then shall you truly dance." ~ Kahlil Gibran

  • #2
    Originally posted by Tilla View Post
    However, West Ham ripped up an agreement they had with Joorabchian - which broke Premier League rules - and they now claim any deal with United can only go ahead with their say-so.
    So if they ripped up the contract and the contract broke premier League rules then Tevez should not be under contract to them.

    Comment


    • #3
      I am no lawyer, but at least I would think that because you ripped up the contract does not mean that the agreement does not still stand. I would think the other party had to be in agreement with cancling the agreement. Where is Gamma when you need him?
      "Only when you drink from the river of silence shall you indeed sing. And when you have reached the mountain top, then you shall begin to climb. And when the earth shall claim your limbs, then shall you truly dance." ~ Kahlil Gibran

      Comment


      • #4
        correct...some contracts may be of a unilateral nature but not this one and ripping it up is one thing but did all the relevant parties sign a novated contract subsequently? if the first contract was void ab initio then whether they ripped it up or not it would have been void....something smellls funny about this saga....i'm sure that is why fifa referred it to the court of arbitration

        Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

        Comment


        • #5
          novated...ab initio

          a whey di...?

          welcome back, gamma!


          BLACK LIVES MATTER

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Gamma View Post
            correct...some contracts may be of a unilateral nature but not this one and ripping it up is one thing but did all the relevant parties sign a novated contract subsequently? if the first contract was void ab initio then whether they ripped it up or not it would have been void....something smellls funny about this saga....i'm sure that is why fifa referred it to the court of arbitration
            Yuh nuh have spell check ?

            Abinitio ??

            Comment


            • #7
              thanks....more money more problems and less time ....anyway...i would have you know that notwithstanding ... those terms are used frequently in the construction industry....

              Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

              Comment


              • #8
                yes it's latin for the "six pack"

                Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Gamma View Post
                  thanks....more money more problems and less time ....anyway...i would have you know that notwithstanding ... those terms are used frequently in the construction industry....
                  Yuh have Construction Industry and yuh have Construction Industry....

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    and then yuh have construction industry...mi know.

                    Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      really?!?!


                      BLACK LIVES MATTER

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        beer?

                        May I have two ab initios, please? I'm having guests over.


                        BLACK LIVES MATTER

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          yuh fulla ab initio already!!!!! is ab initio dat a talk?

                          Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Mosiah View Post
                            beer?

                            May I have two ab initios, please? I'm having guests over.
                            Get them BEFORE they start work (they can call in sick).. that way you avoid having to pay the 'manager'..

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I am going to tear up my mortage contract and tell the bank that I own my house!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
                              The same type of thinking that created a problem cannot be used to solve the problem.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X