The idea of specialised training for gifted footballers in an academy-type structure must, however, be encouraged. I am not prepared to throw out the idea altogether, and what I would suggest is that we try to modify the concept a bit. I recommend to the JFF that rather than have a central, live-in academy, they should explore the possibility of parish academies. So in all 14 parishes, they would choose the best, say, 13-and-under footballers and have them come in for specialised training every weekend. They would also spend extra time there on holidays.
This programme could be associated with a school in each parish. So in St Elizabeth, STETHS could be the home base for the youngsters in that parish. Rusea's and Manchester High could also serve as home bases for others in Hanover and Manchester, respectively. The young footballers would do two training sessions every Saturday and would be exposed to the top coaches around. They would spend three seasons in this parish-type setting and the very best of them would gravitate to the national Under-17 squad.
http://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/c...ball-academies
Well it fits our economic reality,in that the physical and academic structures of schools can be used,instead of sourcing money to build said structure,2nd it covers a larger pool in sourcing talent in parishes to identify the best (300) 3rd Top coaches around the world ? How would the JFF finance that ! Why not implement a certification program to churn out top coaches who would spread knowledge around the land ,not only every weekend as suggested by MR Higgins,but to other schools and clubs continously ?
We need to think practical in a cultural and economic sense.I like the suggestion of using the schools, I wonder where I have heard that before.The top coaches and how Mr Higgins suggest we use them,is a no no for me ,because of the 1st economic and 2nd cultural reality.Knowledge needs to be taught yes ! but also retained locally and increased.I dont see top coaches being invited in under paid circumstances doing this "wi bruk",again every weekend,
This programme could be associated with a school in each parish. So in St Elizabeth, STETHS could be the home base for the youngsters in that parish. Rusea's and Manchester High could also serve as home bases for others in Hanover and Manchester, respectively. The young footballers would do two training sessions every Saturday and would be exposed to the top coaches around. They would spend three seasons in this parish-type setting and the very best of them would gravitate to the national Under-17 squad.
http://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/c...ball-academies
Well it fits our economic reality,in that the physical and academic structures of schools can be used,instead of sourcing money to build said structure,2nd it covers a larger pool in sourcing talent in parishes to identify the best (300) 3rd Top coaches around the world ? How would the JFF finance that ! Why not implement a certification program to churn out top coaches who would spread knowledge around the land ,not only every weekend as suggested by MR Higgins,but to other schools and clubs continously ?
We need to think practical in a cultural and economic sense.I like the suggestion of using the schools, I wonder where I have heard that before.The top coaches and how Mr Higgins suggest we use them,is a no no for me ,because of the 1st economic and 2nd cultural reality.Knowledge needs to be taught yes ! but also retained locally and increased.I dont see top coaches being invited in under paid circumstances doing this "wi bruk",again every weekend,
Comment