RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Chelsea looks a different beast

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Chelsea looks a different beast

    How much did he spend ,the net spend is performing...hehe,unlike Man U .
    THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

    "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


    "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

  • #2
    Originally posted by Sir X View Post
    How much did he spend ,the net spend is performing...hehe,unlike Man U .
    Peter, this is another example of where lack of comprehension "shines" through. How many times have I said net spend is only relevant as a means to achieve/maintain "parity". While eedyboo may have been saying this in jest, there are loads of other examples on the board where eedyboo argues with comments like this that highligh his lack of understanding and comprehension. City, Arsenal, and Chelsea are among the top 4 clubs in wage bil/squad value, guess where they lie in the table?
    "H.L & Brick .....mi deh pan di wagon (Man City)" - X_____ http://www.reggaeboyzsc.com/forum1/showthread.php?p=378365&highlight=City+Liverpool#p ost378365

    X DESCRIBES HIMSELF - Stop masquerading as if you have the clubs interest at heart, you are a fraud, always was and always will be in any and every thing that you present...

    Comment


    • #3
      Peter, this is another example of where lack of comprehension "shines" through. How many times have I said net spend is only relevant as a means to achieve/maintain "parity"

      YUH LOVE CHAT FAWWWTTTT ?

      * WHEN IS NET SPEND NOT RELEVANT
      * HOW CAN YOU ACHIEVE PARITY WITHOUT NETSPEND
      * WHAT DO YOU CALL PARITY

      While eedyboo may have been saying this in jest, there are loads of other examples on the board where eedyboo argues with comments like this that highligh his lack of understanding and comprehension.


      Saying that chelsea look like a different beast isnt jest ,they do

      :City, Arsenal, and Chelsea are among the top 4 clubs in wage bil/squad value, guess where they lie in the table? [/QUOTE]


      Good for them
      * Was the position on the table handed to them
      * Where are the other teams with lesser wage bill/squad value,esp Liverpool
      * Are you saying that teams dont increase/decrease in value through competion- player perforamance- financed through a net spend

      Look you have made yourself look the ass when you stated that net spend in neglible and finances are needed- (contradiction) It only proves you havent a clue about net spend,parity,wage bill or the value of squad value.In other words yuh a mek sh*t up.
      Last edited by Sir X; November 6, 2016, 12:33 PM.
      THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

      "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


      "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Sir X View Post
        Peter, this is another example of where lack of comprehension "shines" through. How many times have I said net spend is only relevant as a means to achieve/maintain "parity"

        YUH LOVE CHAT FAWWWTTTT ?

        * WHEN IS NET SPEND NOT RELEVANT
        * HOW CAN YOU ACHIEVE PARITY WITHOUT NETSPEND
        * WHAT DO YOU CALL PARITY

        While eedyboo may have been saying this in jest, there are loads of other examples on the board where eedyboo argues with comments like this that highligh his lack of understanding and comprehension.


        Saying that chelsea look like a different beast isnt jest ,they do

        [B]:City, Arsenal, and Chelsea are among the top 4 clubs in wage bil/squad value, guess where they lie in the table?

        Good for them
        * Was the position on the table handed to them
        * Where are the other teams with lesser wage bill/squad value,esp Liverpool
        * Are you saying that teams dont increase/decrease in value through competion- player perforamance- financed through a net spend

        Look you have made yourself look the ass when you stated that net spend in neglible and finances are needed- (contradiction) It only proves you havent a clue about net spend,parity,wage bill or the value of squad value.In other words yuh a mek sh*t up.
        Whooooooooooooooooooooops!!! Loads more examples of ignorance!!! LOL!!! You're flatly stupid. He he he... have a nice day.
        "H.L & Brick .....mi deh pan di wagon (Man City)" - X_____ http://www.reggaeboyzsc.com/forum1/showthread.php?p=378365&highlight=City+Liverpool#p ost378365

        X DESCRIBES HIMSELF - Stop masquerading as if you have the clubs interest at heart, you are a fraud, always was and always will be in any and every thing that you present...

        Comment

        Working...
        X