The match can be referenced many ways as can all matches but claiming Liverpool's performance fantastic is a far stretch.
What the match was for me: It was perfect example how a team (Liverpool) can get desired result. The goals they scored was direct result of simple sensible plays - good movement and passing, passing and movement ending with sweet simple passing into goal. Wonderful plays.
Yes but for the Leicester 'keeper it could be 6 or 7. What can Liverpool be if so many passes did not go astray?
On the flipside defensively Liverpool was wide open. Leicester in the final 3rd, to put it mildly, was not as sensible with the ball. The movement was OK...too often players did not meet balls = gift (of ball) to Liverpool...& too often pass on goal made when TEAMMATE & GOD faced goal = better placed (a mistake Liverpool often never made)...yet for all that they carved Liverpool open 3 or 4 times. What tenner would the match have taken if 2 or 3 goals resulted?
Great teaching tool for our JA teacher coaches. Would be wonderful fodder for TEAM-CLASS DISCUSSION.
What the match was for me: It was perfect example how a team (Liverpool) can get desired result. The goals they scored was direct result of simple sensible plays - good movement and passing, passing and movement ending with sweet simple passing into goal. Wonderful plays.
Yes but for the Leicester 'keeper it could be 6 or 7. What can Liverpool be if so many passes did not go astray?
On the flipside defensively Liverpool was wide open. Leicester in the final 3rd, to put it mildly, was not as sensible with the ball. The movement was OK...too often players did not meet balls = gift (of ball) to Liverpool...& too often pass on goal made when TEAMMATE & GOD faced goal = better placed (a mistake Liverpool often never made)...yet for all that they carved Liverpool open 3 or 4 times. What tenner would the match have taken if 2 or 3 goals resulted?
Great teaching tool for our JA teacher coaches. Would be wonderful fodder for TEAM-CLASS DISCUSSION.
Comment