So among a group of arrogant twits there is a culture of behaving like a cannibal clique.
In the past when the group turned on one of their own there was no push back. The victim just died. ...some pleaded and begged to be spared...others weeped...still other just gave silence.
The arrogant group strutted and preened none more so that "Jack". So, as is the way of the pack, down he went.
How that was engineered? His former friend and associate "Chuck" has the inside track on that.
"Jack" pleaded and begged to be allowed to sing his sankie and find his way 'back in'...he then threatened he would not go down alone. When he was ignored he promised a tsunami.
The group then tried to 'circle the waggon' but a few rebels saw it as an opportunity to grab the top post and control. Others thought, no...we as group must in lock-step control. Out came the tried and not so true tactic of killing off the rebels by exposure of past transgressions or trumped up charges.
A careful look at the charge of providing support funds to some affiliates could have consequences the group never intended...their complete demise????
------
Question: If provision of sponsorship funds to bodies who subsequently you appear before seeking votes is 'Criminal'...???? How many have given gifts, sponsorship funding at FIFA, CONFEDERATION, NATIONAL or intra-country levels and gained victory at the ballot and control of football entities? ...criminals all?
------
...if separation of the 'so-called criminals' = separation of their support funding how does that affect the game?
FIFA makes rulings on dispersment of appointments and funds. ...manipulated to secure votes????? 'Potentially criminal' or just 'criminal'?
In the past when the group turned on one of their own there was no push back. The victim just died. ...some pleaded and begged to be spared...others weeped...still other just gave silence.
The arrogant group strutted and preened none more so that "Jack". So, as is the way of the pack, down he went.
How that was engineered? His former friend and associate "Chuck" has the inside track on that.
"Jack" pleaded and begged to be allowed to sing his sankie and find his way 'back in'...he then threatened he would not go down alone. When he was ignored he promised a tsunami.
The group then tried to 'circle the waggon' but a few rebels saw it as an opportunity to grab the top post and control. Others thought, no...we as group must in lock-step control. Out came the tried and not so true tactic of killing off the rebels by exposure of past transgressions or trumped up charges.
A careful look at the charge of providing support funds to some affiliates could have consequences the group never intended...their complete demise????
------
Question: If provision of sponsorship funds to bodies who subsequently you appear before seeking votes is 'Criminal'...???? How many have given gifts, sponsorship funding at FIFA, CONFEDERATION, NATIONAL or intra-country levels and gained victory at the ballot and control of football entities? ...criminals all?
------
...if separation of the 'so-called criminals' = separation of their support funding how does that affect the game?
FIFA makes rulings on dispersment of appointments and funds. ...manipulated to secure votes????? 'Potentially criminal' or just 'criminal'?
Comment