RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lazie, Jangle...DeGea single-handedly

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Details will vary, the big picture IMO, is that clubs will try to wear down a player who wants to leave, a player they would like to keep. I haven't followed De Gea's situation so I can't make a proper comment on his particular situation.
    Peter R

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Lazie View Post
      For this I blame Woodward .. and possibly LvG. Why did they allow DeGea's contract to run into the last year? They should have played him against Club Brugge and cup tie him for the UCL.
      And thereby dropping his value by untold millions...why would you do that????? Now I understand that keeping him to the end of his contract and letting him go on a free would work if he was the difference maker in Manu** getting back to the champions league...if they failed to get back to the champions league however, then that gamble would be seen as incredibly irresponsible or stupid. But if they did make it back, it would be hailed as "pure genius" because the $ from the UCL qualification would far outweigh the $ from selling the keeper. But he didn't play him against Brugge did he? Therefore, this should tell you that LvG is either less confident in De Gea to be the difference maker, or worse (for you and yours), less confident that top 4 is a foregone conclusion.
      "H.L & Brick .....mi deh pan di wagon (Man City)" - X_____ http://www.reggaeboyzsc.com/forum1/showthread.php?p=378365&highlight=City+Liverpool#p ost378365

      X DESCRIBES HIMSELF - Stop masquerading as if you have the clubs interest at heart, you are a fraud, always was and always will be in any and every thing that you present...

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Paul Marin View Post
        And thereby dropping his value by untold millions...why would you do that????? Now I understand that keeping him to the end of his contract and letting him go on a free would work if he was the difference maker in Manu** getting back to the champions league...if they failed to get back to the champions league however, then that gamble would be seen as incredibly irresponsible or stupid. But if they did make it back, it would be hailed as "pure genius" because the $ from the UCL qualification would far outweigh the $ from selling the keeper. But he didn't play him against Brugge did he? Therefore, this should tell you that LvG is either less confident in De Gea to be the difference maker, or worse (for you and yours), less confident that top 4 is a foregone conclusion.
        Yes, cup tie him in the UCL would push down his value, but I'm of the view we should use him this season and let him go when it is over. Without him RM will not be winning 5hit. So, we lose him for nothing, and they lose all the titles this season ... hell getting relegated would be even better.
        "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Rockman View Post
          He may very well do that,my guess is the keeper will take the fine though.There is trouble in the house but LvG seems quite capable of imposing his will.I think RM will be mindful of future transfers when dealing with the deGea matter,LvG may very well have the last laugh.
          The last laugh how? RM is paying him 5 million not to sign the contract being offered by MU.
          "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

          Comment


          • #20
            I think a deal will be ironed out,deGea will leave and RM will make sure Man U is compensated(they will not go the free transfer route)so as maintain the good relationship between both clubs.

            Comment


            • #21
              Maybe deGea would have the goal Carrick scored(lol)but so far,not firlding the kepper is without consequences.This are really bad between the jeeper and LvG,I think there is a undisclosed agreement between Madrid and Man U,or surely LvG would have fielded the keeper.whether he leaves before or after the season has ended is the question,preparing for life after deGea is rightly prioritized by the manager though.

              Comment


              • #22
                With or without him, RM will not win sh!t with Benitez at the helm.
                Hey .. look at the bright side .... at least you're not a Liverpool fan! - Lazie 2/24/10 Paul Marin -19 is one thing, 20 is a whole other matter. It gets even worse if they win the UCL. *groan*. 05/18/2011.MU fans naah cough, but all a unuh a vomit?-Lazie 1/11/2015

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Jangle View Post
                  With or without him, RM will not win sh!t with Benitez at the helm.
                  X-cuse me?!?!
                  Peter R

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Oooooooo oh no you di'int!!!!!

                    Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Jangle View Post
                      With or without him, RM will not win sh!t with Benitez at the helm.
                      Shots fired!!!!!! Let the war begin!!!! LOL!!!!
                      "H.L & Brick .....mi deh pan di wagon (Man City)" - X_____ http://www.reggaeboyzsc.com/forum1/showthread.php?p=378365&highlight=City+Liverpool#p ost378365

                      X DESCRIBES HIMSELF - Stop masquerading as if you have the clubs interest at heart, you are a fraud, always was and always will be in any and every thing that you present...

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Lazie View Post
                        Yes, cup tie him in the UCL would push down his value, but I'm of the view we should use him this season and let him go when it is over. Without him RM will not be winning 5hit. So, we lose him for nothing, and they lose all the titles this season ... hell getting relegated would be even better.
                        RM is not in the Premier League, so LvG is not going to think of the positive/negative impact to them. He will only be thinking (and correctly so) of the impact on Manu**. To me, cup-tying the keeper makes no sense other than spite...but hey, the more chupid financial decisions y'all make, the better.
                        "H.L & Brick .....mi deh pan di wagon (Man City)" - X_____ http://www.reggaeboyzsc.com/forum1/showthread.php?p=378365&highlight=City+Liverpool#p ost378365

                        X DESCRIBES HIMSELF - Stop masquerading as if you have the clubs interest at heart, you are a fraud, always was and always will be in any and every thing that you present...

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X