That's one way to look at it, BUT, let's look at, for example, the $10 M US that South Africa (allegedly) paid in bribe to JW et al; it could have been provided to the Federation.. right? and the total of $150M US over the time could have gone very far. Now I realize that those who had/paid those monies probably would otherwise have spent most of it on themselves if there were no corruption, but, even a 25 % of that would have been nice.
That was a nice post, Peter!
However, in the past the funds were not as large...but the most nations got ZILCH! NOTHING! ABASOLUTELY NOTHING! Do we wish to go back to that by putting the nations that were in charge when we got NOTHING to return to the helm?
Well...there must be a solution that gets a fair distribution of the present billions such that each nation receives even more than is presently being received...but how do you think will lead in such manner?
The EUROPEAN nations' leaders always speak of the small countries being not worthy...be it refs at major tournaments, administrators within FIFA or money!!! Do you take them at their word...or do you believe 'dem man deh cyan be suh wiked'?
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."
Comment