RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

12 best managers since 2004, No Benitez , Youth coach Tops

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 12 best managers since 2004, No Benitez , Youth coach Tops

    The World's 12 Biggest Spending Managers Since 2004
    Views26,021
    ByJamie Spencer on7 May 2015
    ShareTweetShareEmbed1,3155
    More often than not success at the highest level in football is built on having vast funds with which to buy the best players. Some use their resources well, others just fritter money away though.

    Here's a look at the 12 coaches and managers who have spent the most on players since 2004.

    *all tallies calculated from ​transfermarkt data
    12. Jurgen Klopp - £173m


    http://www.90min.com/posts/2043756-t...m_medium=share
    THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

    "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


    "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

  • #2
    What do you mean by "Youth coach tops"?

    But anyway, here is that list rewritten from most money to least money spent by club the coach is associated with, with their current position in their respective leagues:

    1. Chelsea - 1
    2. Real Madrid -2
    3. ManCity - 2
    4. ManCity -2
    5. Arsenal - 3
    6. ManU - 4
    7. Bayern M - 1
    8. ManU - 4
    9. Liverpool - 5
    10. Juventus -1
    11. Juventus - 1
    12. Dortmund - 7

    While the amount spent is associated with the Manager, it is also instructive to see with which club they are associated. If there were a "by club" spending, I feel the amounts ranking wouldn't change much and there might be an(other) team(s) in there... say from Ligue 1 that are up there in their league.

    I think that this clearly spells out what Paul has been saying about money spent and teams standings in the league.

    And on another note, why would we want Klopp over BR if we are to give any credence to these figures?
    Peter R

    Comment


    • #3
      ANd after seeing yesterday's match, at least end of the first half and the second, I think we did a fantastic job and should have won the game had we had more clinical finishing.

      We need a healthy Sturridge back and another top striker!
      Peter R

      Comment


      • #4
        Is be figure for Mourinho the total for Chelsea or is it his transfers at Purto, Chelsea, Inter, Real and Chelsea?
        "Only when you drink from the river of silence shall you indeed sing. And when you have reached the mountain top, then you shall begin to climb. And when the earth shall claim your limbs, then shall you truly dance." ~ Kahlil Gibran

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Peter R View Post
          What do you mean by "Youth coach tops"?

          But anyway, here is that list rewritten from most money to least money spent by club the coach is associated with, with their current position in their respective leagues:

          1. Chelsea - 1
          2. Real Madrid -2
          3. ManCity - 2
          4. ManCity -2
          5. Arsenal - 3
          6. ManU - 4
          7. Bayern M - 1
          8. ManU - 4
          9. Liverpool - 5
          10. Juventus -1
          11. Juventus - 1
          12. Dortmund - 7

          While the amount spent is associated with the Manager, it is also instructive to see with which club they are associated. If there were a "by club" spending, I feel the amounts ranking wouldn't change much and there might be an(other) team(s) in there... say from Ligue 1 that are up there in their league.

          I think that this clearly spells out what Paul has been saying about money spent and teams standings in the league.

          And on another note, why would we want Klopp over BR if we are to give any credence to these figures?
          I didn't read the article closely, but based on current standings, the Prem breaks down PERFECTLY to the amount of money spent across the top 5. I did not read the article closely, but when you see a manager like Mancini beating a Wenger in the standings, you can only shake your head and ask what if it were a level playing field like the olden days.

          Liverpool's mistakes came with the previous management of Moores and Rick "coco the clown" Parry. They had a perfect opportunity to position LFC with the big money oligarchs that dominate the prem now but pulled the deal from Dubai Investment Capital in favour of Hicks & Gillette. That has to be one of the biggest business blunders of all time. Now, we have some poor billionaire wannabee owners who while rich, are relative paupers compared to the owners of our rivals.
          "H.L & Brick .....mi deh pan di wagon (Man City)" - X_____ http://www.reggaeboyzsc.com/forum1/showthread.php?p=378365&highlight=City+Liverpool#p ost378365

          X DESCRIBES HIMSELF - Stop masquerading as if you have the clubs interest at heart, you are a fraud, always was and always will be in any and every thing that you present...

          Comment


          • #6
            Manu owners not that rich but were smart.
            • Don't let negative things break you, instead let it be your strength, your reason for growth. Life is for living and I won't spend my life feeling cheated and downtrodden.

            Comment

            Working...
            X