Anti-TEAM hurts!

[Karl]

Gareth Bale is in the bad books of the two other members of Real Madrid's 'BBC' attack.

At the weekend Los Blancos lost their first match since September, going down 2-1 to Valencia. It was a result that brought an end to a stunning 22-match winning streak.

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/f...t-9960718.html

[Assasin]

What if he had score??? ala Harry Kane??

I thought you had Gareth Bale in your TEAM??? so what happen?

[Gamma]

the streak had to come to an end. it is the nature of things ...... so draft the anti-team memo, leave the names blank and then insert the names when the streak ends.

[Assasin]

Isn't Bale the prototype baller for Karl?? Fast, play left right, defense, forward and maybe even goalie. No he can't be Anti-TEAM.

[Gamma]

oh but he can. if he does not ALWAYS complete a pass, win a tackle, or score a shot ... so karl judge them on each play rather than the balance for the game.

in that regard EVERY single player who has EVER played the game could be considered anti team!!! except karl of course, or could it be that ~GASP~ karl is also Anti team?!!! SAY IT ALL, KARL!!

[Assasin]

Did you see Ronaldo and Benzuma reaction??? Wasn't that also Anti-TEAM? LOL!!!!

Funny how he has Suarez in his TEAM. What is more anti TEAM than for selfish reason you miss 7 games and 3 months?

[Karl]

What if he had score??? ala Harry Kane??

Apparently you think both situations were similar?

Let me ask a question?
Did Kane have TEAMmates in 'tap-in' positions?

The follow up question - Do you still think both situations were similar?
If not, will you be honest with self and admit (to self) that your suggestion that both situations were similar was 'unfortunate'?

If you still think both situations were similar then you have still not understood what you saw in either one of the attacks or both. ...review them again.

I thought you had Gareth Bale in your TEAM??? so what happen?

Question: Do you think each player is human and at times, as humans are wont to, do silly things/engage in silly acts?

Yes, Bale type player would be in my dream TEAM!

[Karl]

oh but he can. if he does not ALWAYS complete a pass, win a tackle, or score a shot ... so karl judge them on each play rather than the balance for the game.

in that regard EVERY single player who has EVER played the game could be considered anti team!!! except karl of course, or could it be that ~GASP~ karl is also Anti team?!!! SAY IT ALL, KARL!!

Again you misunderstand - i) I never said players who are TEAM players cannot commit anti-TEAM acts or vice versa. ii) A player is never considered an anti-TEAM player if his transgressions are few when compared to quality players norm.

For the millionth time - Actions are judged on 'numbers' i.e. %age rate of success when compared to a decided norm.

1st there is arbitary - = combination of the subjective and the objective deduction - rankings of players. The pass mark for rate of success is high e.g.
- Movement is expected to be just about continuous during a game.

The player such as a Theo Walcott who gives great movement on attack but poor movement when on defense is considered mediocre on movement.

He is being compared to top quality players at their prime. TH14; BALE; Sterling; Thomas Muller; Hazard - Players who when playing on the wing as Walcott does gives much more effort and efficiency on movement.

Walcott gives less than 50% effort on defense. All the players I would use to compare him with give 'more' on movement. If I conclude that on movement Walcott can do as well as those named players but does not...then I must conclude they work harder for TEAM and he does not. ...so if my cut off point on considered effort and efficiency is player type like those named above...then Walcott falling below such is ear-marked as anti-TEAM player.

TEAM player v anti-TEAM player is a numbers game. So it stands to reason that since it is 'numbers game' = %age success rate at doing...then anti-TEAM acts will be committed by TEAM players!

...and TEAM acts by anti-TEAM players!

I am not explaining something new as Assassin and Gamma would like to have others believe. I think that for some reason Assassin and Gamma are making asses of selves to defend the point of my being inconsistent as they pretend to not understand the highlighted points on anti-TEAM player and anti-TEAM act.

[Gamma]

Oh for sure someone has made an ass of themself!

[Assasin]

"TEAM player v anti-TEAM player is a numbers game"

Who decides the number??? You??? That is where it goes all wrong. Anti TEAM is not like a switch, you don't turn it on and off as you like. Players make bad decisions and mental mistakes from time to time.