Video released showing conclusively that he did...or...
is it being assumed that the opponent:
a) never 'simulated' asking for an undeserved call...and based on that stellar record his word must be taken as 'gospel'
...or...
b) never knew of Suarez's record and also not was trying to even things up by having Suarez sent off and a 10 v 10 resulting?
Just asking as by the 'live' broadcasts and the replays - forget the commentator jumping in claiming clear bite - even in slow-motion suggests that there could have been a bite or bites or alternatively that Suarez may even have thought of biting and quickly decided against same.
...the immediate 'video frames' did not even show such that I could see, 'redness' on that 'white' shoulder.
Not saying Suarez bit the opponent or that he did not bite the opponent...just saying I have not seen the conclusive evidence of such.
is it being assumed that the opponent:
a) never 'simulated' asking for an undeserved call...and based on that stellar record his word must be taken as 'gospel'
...or...
b) never knew of Suarez's record and also not was trying to even things up by having Suarez sent off and a 10 v 10 resulting?
Just asking as by the 'live' broadcasts and the replays - forget the commentator jumping in claiming clear bite - even in slow-motion suggests that there could have been a bite or bites or alternatively that Suarez may even have thought of biting and quickly decided against same.
...the immediate 'video frames' did not even show such that I could see, 'redness' on that 'white' shoulder.
Not saying Suarez bit the opponent or that he did not bite the opponent...just saying I have not seen the conclusive evidence of such.
Comment