X DESCRIBES HIMSELF - Stop masquerading as if you have the clubs interest at heart, you are a fraud, always was and always will be in any and every thing that you present...
See what I mean... if indeed your scrutiny is correct. I.e., if you call for a review, which I think should be available since the technology is there, then whatever the tape reveals should stand.. in other words, if Barca disputed the offside and what you say was true then MAYBE a penalty could be granted. That again would be dependent on some amount of interpretation regarding ball to hand etc etc.
Bottom line though, we have the technology to rectify quite a few wrongs, yet we don't use it. Sad situation.
As I keep telling you...if they do that, how else will "they" tief?
X DESCRIBES HIMSELF - Stop masquerading as if you have the clubs interest at heart, you are a fraud, always was and always will be in any and every thing that you present...
Is that so? or is it when the ref blows the whistle? (re play being over)... allowing play to continue even if there is an infringement is NOT UNPRECEDENTED in sports... it's just plain common sense
Based on video evidence Barca scored 2 goals under the laws of the game of football. One more than their opponent.
Yuh have any argument wid dat ? wheh yuh ah jump up and dung bout ?
Based on "video evidence"? LOL!!! Bredrin...based on "video evidence" Eto'o fouled Suarez in the box when Liverpool played Chelsea, and Raheem Sterling scored at City...that would have been a 4 point swing and the title to Liverpool. A suh dem tings go...hush...me know it hot.
X DESCRIBES HIMSELF - Stop masquerading as if you have the clubs interest at heart, you are a fraud, always was and always will be in any and every thing that you present...
Comment