Tweet
...and Toure the elder's diving and heading a ball around
away from and around the goal for his Arsenal?
What say the Suarez haters of those occasions in every match where a number of players who are not fouled appeal for one to be called on an opponent? Disgusting cheats? ...and should each join their pool of players given Suarez like vitriolic attacks? If not, what sense of rational thought or of bred fairness that allows them to put Suarez in the special place to reel under their vitriolic attacks?
...and what of those players who deliberately deny the opponent an attack on goal. Yes...those that as had in the referenced 'Suarez incident' denied a goal-scoring opportunity by foul means just it not being a handball on the line?
...in such circumstances of denying a goal-scoring opportunity, what of those who hold an opponent to prevent the pass/shot on goal?
...those who fell an opponent?
...or those who engaged in deliberate handball just not on the goal-line but a few paces out?
What great logic do these Suarez haters apply to not put all those very many players in the same category as that that causes them to spew vitriol at and on Suarez? Selective deductive reasoning? ...or just plain lying to selves? I wonder!!!!!
Truth is, if logic was the order of the day it would be more than 90% of the current football professional players in their pool of 'those at which to direct vitriol'. Crazy world isn't it?
The list of players who use means that run afoul of the 'Laws of the Game' is a never ending one. It makes for great media hoopla. It gives the talking heads an emotional connection to fan(atic)s and assist in keeping them relevant. Hey!...this contrived piling on has us all emotionally connected even as there is disagreement on the quality 'justice' meted out to Suarez. Need I say it, the media assassination is unjust and so is that meted out by some fans of the game.
-------------------
Aside: Even the fan who kicks-about in friendly competition employ foul means against opponents to deny goals. You would not hear any such directing vitriol at rival friends or teammates. Why not? Why the double standard? Innate programming that blames others for committing 'wrongs' they themselves frequently engage in? ...and the refrain; "That is different!"
Crazy isn't it? 
-------------------
Free Suarez!!!
away from and around the goal for his Arsenal?
What say the Suarez haters of those occasions in every match where a number of players who are not fouled appeal for one to be called on an opponent? Disgusting cheats? ...and should each join their pool of players given Suarez like vitriolic attacks? If not, what sense of rational thought or of bred fairness that allows them to put Suarez in the special place to reel under their vitriolic attacks?
...and what of those players who deliberately deny the opponent an attack on goal. Yes...those that as had in the referenced 'Suarez incident' denied a goal-scoring opportunity by foul means just it not being a handball on the line?
...in such circumstances of denying a goal-scoring opportunity, what of those who hold an opponent to prevent the pass/shot on goal?
...those who fell an opponent?
...or those who engaged in deliberate handball just not on the goal-line but a few paces out?
What great logic do these Suarez haters apply to not put all those very many players in the same category as that that causes them to spew vitriol at and on Suarez? Selective deductive reasoning? ...or just plain lying to selves? I wonder!!!!!
Truth is, if logic was the order of the day it would be more than 90% of the current football professional players in their pool of 'those at which to direct vitriol'. Crazy world isn't it?
The list of players who use means that run afoul of the 'Laws of the Game' is a never ending one. It makes for great media hoopla. It gives the talking heads an emotional connection to fan(atic)s and assist in keeping them relevant. Hey!...this contrived piling on has us all emotionally connected even as there is disagreement on the quality 'justice' meted out to Suarez. Need I say it, the media assassination is unjust and so is that meted out by some fans of the game.
-------------------
Aside: Even the fan who kicks-about in friendly competition employ foul means against opponents to deny goals. You would not hear any such directing vitriol at rival friends or teammates. Why not? Why the double standard? Innate programming that blames others for committing 'wrongs' they themselves frequently engage in? ...and the refrain; "That is different!"
Crazy isn't it? -------------------
Free Suarez!!!
Comment