You took offense, at least IMO, that the match between Chelsea and Man City referred to them as "outstanding". Of course, you brought ManU into the picture but again, IMO, you failed to give these teams their due... "hayting"
You also did on another recent occasion bring something up but I'm too Lazie, sorry, lazy (busy actually) to go look it up right now.
You took offense, at least IMO, that the match between Chelsea and Man City referred to them as "outstanding". Of course, you brought ManU into the picture but again, IMO, you failed to give these teams their due... "hayting"
You also did on another recent occasion bring something up but I'm too Lazie, sorry, lazy (busy actually) to go look it up right now.
Stating a fact does not constitute hating PR. If Man City and Chelsea are considered outstanding, teams that finished 11 and 14 points behind the CHAMPIONS, despite the CHAMPS shutting after beating Villa. Then mi curious what they'd say about that team.
"Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)
You can "wallpaper" it any way you like... at best it sounds grudgeful or petty even on your part when you appear to be aggrieved when another team is described by an adjective you feel should ONLY belong to your team...
Comment