RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sepp Blatter-Nothing seem to stick on him....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sepp Blatter-Nothing seem to stick on him....

    while everyone around him are caught red handed



    FIFA veteran Havelange quits in bribes scandal as Blatter is branded 'clumsy' as he's cleared of misconduct

    PUBLISHED: 10:08, 30 April 2013 | UPDATED: 10:31, 30 April 2013

    Joao Havelange, the Brazilian who ruled FIFA for more than two decades, has resigned as honorary president of the world governing body after being named as having received bribes.


    The long-awaited reported by FIFA's ethics committee into the scandal involving collapsed marketing partners ISL has named Havelange and two former executive committee members Ricardo Teixeira and Nicolas Leoz as receiving bribes. All three have since resigned from FIFA.



    Shamed: Joao Havelange quit after being named as having received bribes

    The report by FIFA Adjudicatory Chamber chairman Hans-Joachim Eckert also calls current FIFA president Sepp Blatter's handling of the scandal 'clumsy' but says it did not breach ethics rules.

    The report states: 'Mr Havelange has long held solely an honorary position, which does not qualify him as an "official" under the code of ethics. Further, Mr Havelange resigned his position as honorary president effective 18.04.2013.'

    Blatter immediately issued a statement welcoming that he had been cleared of misconduct.

    He said: 'I also note with satisfaction that this report confirms that "President Blatter's conduct could not be classified in any way as misconduct with regard to any ethics rules".

    'I have no doubt that FIFA, thanks to the governance reform process that I proposed, now has the mechanisms and means to ensure that such an issue - which has caused untold damage to the reputation of our institution - does not happen again.'

    Eckert does question Blatter's role in the scandal however.

    He states: 'It must be questioned, however, whether President Blatter knew or should have known over the years before the bankruptcy of ISL that ISL had made payments (bribes) to other FIFA officials.'



    Boost: FIFA President Sepp Blatter was cleared of misconduct



    Top men: Former president Joao Havelange of Brazil, left, and current president Sepp Blatter of Switzerland

    The report states that in 1997, Blatter authorised the transfer of 1.5million Swiss francs (£1million) to Havelange after ISL mistakenly sent it to FIFA.

    But Blatter, who was then general secretary of the organisation when Havelange was president, told the ethics investigation 'at that time he did not suspect the payment was a commission'.

    'President Blatter's conduct could not be classified in any way as misconduct with regard to any ethics rules,' says the report.
    'The conduct of President Blatter may have been clumsy because there could be an internal need for clarification, but this does not lead to any criminal or ethical misconduct.'

    The ethics report does not state the total sum of bribes paid but says they took place over eight years between 1992 and May 2000.

    'From money that passed through the ISMM/ISL Group, it is certain that not inconsiderable amounts were channelled to former FIFA President Havelange and to his son-in-law Ricardo Teixeira as well as to Dr. Nicolas Leoz, whereby there is no indication that any form of service was given in return by them.

    'These payments were apparently made via front companies in order to cover up the true recipient and are to be qualified as 'commissions', known today as "bribes".'

    Court documents state Havelange, now aged 96, received at least £1million and Teixeira at least £8.4million, and in total the pair may have received up to £14.5m. Leoz, now aged 84, was named in court as having received at least £80,000.


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/foo...#ixzz2RwwFRgmu
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
    Last edited by Karl; April 30, 2013, 08:48 AM.

  • #2
    Simple Dunny - Those with incriminating info have to thing of selves. No one has yet got mad enough to say, 'to hell with the price I shall have to pay'!!!

    Am sure 'Jack' thought of it...but then there is the risk of him returning to his school-teacher only type financial standing...and so far to him that is not palatable.
    "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

    Comment


    • #3
      The "Real" Teflon Don.
      Hey .. look at the bright side .... at least you're not a Liverpool fan! - Lazie 2/24/10 Paul Marin -19 is one thing, 20 is a whole other matter. It gets even worse if they win the UCL. *groan*. 05/18/2011.MU fans naah cough, but all a unuh a vomit?-Lazie 1/11/2015

      Comment


      • #4
        The report states that in 1997, Blatter authorised the transfer of 1.5million Swiss francs (£1million) to Havelange after ISL mistakenly sent it to FIFA.

        So tell me something, can anyone see a CFO/Secretary receiving a check payable to their organization but they know it was a mistake diverting the funds to a third party? Wouldn't you return it to the sender? This is so blatant it is beyond funny.
        "H.L & Brick .....mi deh pan di wagon (Man City)" - X_____ http://www.reggaeboyzsc.com/forum1/showthread.php?p=378365&highlight=City+Liverpool#p ost378365

        X DESCRIBES HIMSELF - Stop masquerading as if you have the clubs interest at heart, you are a fraud, always was and always will be in any and every thing that you present...

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Paul Marin View Post
          The report states that in 1997, Blatter authorised the transfer of 1.5million Swiss francs (£1million) to Havelange after ISL mistakenly sent it to FIFA.

          So tell me something, can anyone see a CFO/Secretary receiving a check payable to their organization but they know it was a mistake diverting the funds to a third party? Wouldn't you return it to the sender? This is so blatant it is beyond funny.
          It seems like he is untouchable Paul!

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Dunny View Post
            It seems like he is untouchable Paul!
            Yes...in that regard, there is nothing new in this report. It only shows how blatantly corrupt they are or best case, incompetent.
            "H.L & Brick .....mi deh pan di wagon (Man City)" - X_____ http://www.reggaeboyzsc.com/forum1/showthread.php?p=378365&highlight=City+Liverpool#p ost378365

            X DESCRIBES HIMSELF - Stop masquerading as if you have the clubs interest at heart, you are a fraud, always was and always will be in any and every thing that you present...

            Comment


            • #7
              ...but Paul, how yuh guh suh faaar?
              Dem waan wi believe that dem nuh kno...or have records that show total owed billings/total sums...outstanding sums, actual receivables and incoming funds/payments?

              Look any tiefin done is known or deliberately ignored.
              "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Karl View Post
                ...but Paul, how yuh guh suh faaar?
                Dem waan wi believe that dem nuh kno...or have records that show total owed billings/total sums...outstanding sums, actual receivables and incoming funds/payments?

                Look any tiefin done is known or deliberately ignored.
                All I am saying is that their actions speak louder than words. If your business received a check wrongly payable to you from a SUPPLIER (not a customer), wouldn't you send the check back to the supplier? Is there any scenario where you can envision depositing the check then cutting another check for the amount received to an EMPLOYEE from your own bank account? Wouldn't that be highly unusual? Wouldn't you ask questions? Like I said, incompetent at best, but that move is more in line with a corrupt organization.
                "H.L & Brick .....mi deh pan di wagon (Man City)" - X_____ http://www.reggaeboyzsc.com/forum1/showthread.php?p=378365&highlight=City+Liverpool#p ost378365

                X DESCRIBES HIMSELF - Stop masquerading as if you have the clubs interest at heart, you are a fraud, always was and always will be in any and every thing that you present...

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Paul Marin View Post
                  All I am saying is that their actions speak louder than words. If your business received a check wrongly payable to you from a SUPPLIER (not a customer), wouldn't you send the check back to the supplier? Is there any scenario where you can envision depositing the check then cutting another check for the amount received to an EMPLOYEE from your own bank account? Wouldn't that be highly unusual? Wouldn't you ask questions? Like I said, incompetent at best, but that move is more in line with a corrupt organization.
                  You are correct...you definitely would not send it on.
                  ...and check from own bank account to replace company check is never on.

                  ...and all I am saying is there are no honest ones within the FIFA hierarchy as the movement of funds must have alerted all to 'wrong happenings'! Said this over and over The FIFA organization is an 'old boys' club'!

                  ...and therefore there is this holding out on 'FIFA's affairs are FIFA's' subject to FIFA's Statues, Rules and Regulations only...and supersedes (supercedes) the laws of any sovereign country and international laws=matters not the 'crime' not one body nah guh a jail!!! Wi jus ole hit dun suh power grabbing an self-enrichment can gwan fram generation to generation through the ages.

                  ...hit is a grandfada ting=yuh ave yuh gran-fada who set yuh hup pan committees, etc...and push yuh fi had-vance. Even ref's appointments r gran-faadad to some hex-tent.

                  When yuh ave many top quality (han sum nat too top quality)...how do they that make it to the top matches - FINAL tournaments, first match (opening round match that sets the tone for the tournament) and prized quarter-fianls through finals selections?

                  It all comes down to the 'who a yuh fren=gran-faada'!!!
                  "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The report says Blatter handled it a little clumsily.



                    BLACK LIVES MATTER

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      ...although this is about one act...there is no other way to try hide movement of funds than that 'a little clumsily" way. There is always a paper trail and today's electronic trail.

                      Just think on it (the) money has to originate=have a source and it must end up somewhere=have an end use. ...using cash does not change that fact. So the only way to try to get around 'trouble' is explanation on movement being legitimate. ...and therein lies the(ir) problem.
                      "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Mosiah View Post
                        The report says Blatter handled it a little clumsily.

                        That's how powerful Sepp happens to be. He actually sees the report as exonerating him even though any fool can see he was at the very least complicit in Jaoa's corruption...and that is me giving him a whooooooooooole HEAP of leeway. Truth is that I believe Sepp is the biggest tief of all...his time will come.
                        "H.L & Brick .....mi deh pan di wagon (Man City)" - X_____ http://www.reggaeboyzsc.com/forum1/showthread.php?p=378365&highlight=City+Liverpool#p ost378365

                        X DESCRIBES HIMSELF - Stop masquerading as if you have the clubs interest at heart, you are a fraud, always was and always will be in any and every thing that you present...

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Paul Marin View Post
                          That's how powerful Sepp happens to be. He actually sees the report as exonerating him even though any fool can see he was at the very least complicit in Jaoa's corruption...and that is me giving him a whooooooooooole HEAP of leeway. Truth is that I believe Sepp is the biggest tief of all...his time will come.
                          But, like Havelange, that might happen when he has long retired and perhaps on his death bed.

                          sigh


                          BLACK LIVES MATTER

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X