Originally posted by Rockman
View Post
Specifically, you have expressly accused me of defending Suarez's DIVING; I have asked you for proof. In reply, you have given me nothing more than innuendo drawn from incorrect conclusions derived from my defending Suarez on other accussations leveled at him. It is lost on you that these other accussations are mutually exclusive of the accusations of diving. Your inability to follow this VERY SIMPLE train of reasoning has lead me to believe you are either intellectually dishonest, or intellectually deficient.
To be clear, I once again challenge you to deliver concrete proof of me defending Suarez's diving. You will not -- because you cannot -- but in the off chance that you do, I will stand corrected.
With regards to sentence structure and basic grammar, teaching you requires that you first demonstrate the ability to follow simple logic, so unfortunately, while I am capable of great altruism, I think I run the risk of further depleting my own brain cell count by undertaking such a monumental challenge. I am not in the business of self destruction, but good luck.
Comment