RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Terry stripped of England captaincy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Terry stripped of England captaincy

    John Terry has been stripped of the England captaincy just 11 months after being reinstated into the role.

    Terry was contacted by Football Association chief David Berstein at 10am on Friday morning and informed of the FA board's decision. There has been no indication about his availability for selection for England duty.
    The Chelsea captain is accused of racially abusing QPR defender Anton Ferdinand but will not stand trial until July, after this summer's European Championship.
    Although he was backed by caoch Fabio Capello and the FA in the initial stages of the case, the news that a trial will not take place for another five months seems to have left the FA with no other option.
    An FA statement said:" Following the decision to adjourn the court case against John Terry to July, The Football Association confirm he will not captain the England team until the allegations against him are resolved.
    "The FA Board expected the trial to be concluded prior to the European Championship. Further to Wednesday's confirmation that the trial will not take place until after the tournament, the board has discussed the matter in detail and has collectively decided it is in the interests of all parties that John has the responsibilities of captaincy removed at this time.
    "This decision has been taken due to the higher profile nature of the England captaincy, on and off the pitch, and the additional demands and requirements expected of the captain leading into and during a tournament.
    "The FA Board can confirm that he has not been excluded from the squad and that Fabio Capello is free to select him for the Holland fixture on 29 February and the European Championship.
    "FA Chairman David Bernstein has spoken to both John Terry and Fabio Capello to explain the facts to them. Fabio Capello has not been involved in The FA Board discussions which reached this conclusion, but understands that the FA board has authority to make this decision. Fabio Capello will take the decision as to who will be made captain moving forward.
    "This decision in no way infers any suggestion of guilt in relation to the charge made against John Terry. The FA will be not be making any further comment on this matter."
    Bernstein contacted the 13 other members of the FA board to seek their views on the situation, with the consensus being that for sporting reasons Terry is no longer in a position to captain his country.
    Terry, originally made captain in 2006, was stripped of the captaincy two years ago after allegations of an affair with team-mate Wayne Bridge's girlfriend, but was reinstated 13 months later.
    Steven Gerrard, if fit, seems certain to take the armband, while former Three Lions captain Rio Ferdinand quickly took to Twitter to rule himself out of the running.
    "I don't want to be england captain after the last episode,just want to concentrate on playin for utd & if I make the squad then as ever I'll be delighted," Ferdinand said.
    "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

  • #2
    from an online forum

    I suppose they had to wait until the court case before taking action . I'm just surprised that they gave him the arm band after he got Wayne Bridge girlfriend pregnant and his dad got caught selling cocaine and his mother got caught stealing dog food and his brother slept with another players girlfriend and the player was so hurt he committed suicide. John terry and his whole family is trash!!
    Winning means you're willing to go longer, work harder, and give more than anyone else - Vince Lombardi

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Hortical View Post
      from an online forum
      What his family did has nothing to do with him keeping the armband .... however, from TV replays proved he did say something racist to Anton ...the armband should have been taken from him.
      "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

      Comment


      • #4
        What his family did has nothing to do with him keeping the armband

        itend to disagree. at the very least it could be a distraction. If he is repping england having his parents arrested/convicted for selling drugs and stealing is not something one would want to associate with the captain ...

        Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Gamma View Post
          What his family did has nothing to do with him keeping the armband

          itend to disagree. at the very least it could be a distraction. If he is repping england having his parents arrested/convicted for selling drugs and stealing is not something one would want to associate with the captain ...

          we can disagree .. no prob there ... however, a youth decides not to follow the criminal ways of his family ... I see no reason why he shouldn't be captain.
          "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

          Comment


          • #6
            What a thing. Wonder if Gamma would want to get fired if his family member decide to be the next Dudus.

            Comment


            • #7
              but he slept with ........?
              • Don't let negative things break you, instead let it be your strength, your reason for growth. Life is for living and I won't spend my life feeling cheated and downtrodden.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Assasin View Post
                but he slept with ........?

                ..well they did take the armband from him for that ... and gave him back.
                "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

                Comment


                • #9
                  Mi nuh have no problem if them want to punish him for what him do.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    fired? is he off the team? captaincy is what i talking about. your captain should not have those things hanging over him as a distraction which could affect the other players and how they look at him given everything else.

                    Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      er ..... he does have a criminal charge hanging over him, remember?

                      Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Lazie View Post
                        What his family did has nothing to do with him keeping the armband .... however, from TV replays proved he did say something racist to Anton ...the armband should have been taken from him.
                        What replay "proof" Lazie? The only replay that I know of showed part of his sentence being obscured. When you hear what he said the sentence was, there was nothing racist to my way of thinking, but maybe your "proof" is from something I have not seen. For example, if I say "I didn't call you a jerk", does that mean I am guilty of calling you something offensive? Terry said his words were "I didn't call you a "black c--t", you f-ing knob". I don't see that as calling him something racist.

                        Please forward a link or some such thing if you have one.

                        That aside, as far as I am concerned, until PROVEN guilty, the man cannot be stripped of anything that implies guilt. I know that if I was accused of something, I would want life to be "as it were" until some fair judicial process can be concluded that proved my guilt.
                        Last edited by Paul Marin; February 3, 2012, 04:39 PM.
                        "H.L & Brick .....mi deh pan di wagon (Man City)" - X_____ http://www.reggaeboyzsc.com/forum1/showthread.php?p=378365&highlight=City+Liverpool#p ost378365

                        X DESCRIBES HIMSELF - Stop masquerading as if you have the clubs interest at heart, you are a fraud, always was and always will be in any and every thing that you present...

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          i see it as no different from when public officials are accused or charged with criminal or unsavory behaviour, take for instance the guy who has been charged with perverting the course of justice, he has resigned from his public appointment and stated his innocence and his intent to fight the charges.

                          i would not be in favour dropping him from the england side, but taking the captaincy sure, it is not right it is a privilege

                          Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas Paine

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Gamma View Post
                            er ..... he does have a criminal charge hanging over him, remember?

                            The youth I spoke about wasn't Terry in case you misunderstood. Now that the he is facing charges, the FA did the right thing, although I thought they should have made the move from TV replays provided evidence that he said it.
                            "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Paul Marin View Post
                              What replay "proof" Lazie? The only replay that I know of showed part of his sentence being obscured. When you hear what he said the sentence was, there was nothing racist to my way of thinking, but maybe your "proof" is from something I have not seen. For example, if I say "I didn't call you a jerk", does that mean I am guilty of calling you something offensive? Terry said his words were "I didn't call you a "black c--t", you f-ing knob". I don't see that as calling him something racist.

                              Please forward a link or some such thing if you have one.

                              That aside, as far as I am concerned, until PROVEN guilty, the man cannot be stripped of anything that implies guilt. I know that if I was accused of something, I would want life to be "as it were" until some fair judicial process can be concluded that proved my guilt.
                              if he didn't say something racist, why blur his mouth? After investigating, why did the authorities decide to charge him?
                              "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X