RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

FIFA denies Warner’s TV rights claim

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • FIFA denies Warner’s TV rights claim

    FIFA denies Warner’s TV rights claim


    Saturday, January 07, 2012


    Read more: http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/sport...#ixzz1imZeg6WV
    "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

  • #2
    Begs these questions:
    a) Were there any talks of quid pro quo? ...as per the 'Godfather' - This gift is attached to, 'when your Godfather comes calling for assistance 'pony up'?

    b) Is there a history of 'scratch my back, I'll scratch yours?

    c) Were there specific discussions on 'votes for favours'?

    d) Is it not true that when deals are made there is often no simultaneous exchange? Is it not a fact that action by one party usually leads to/is followed by 'honouring' of obligations by the other party? ...that quid pro quo?
    "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

    Comment


    • #3
      duh!
      Peter R

      Comment


      • #4
        Believe it or not

        Originally posted by Peter R View Post
        duh!
        The World of football in the CFU and CONCACAF and more than likely many all ready knew what FIFA would say to JW and what past docs they had to prove that Jack Warner never needs to return to the game. We need to realize and find him an embarrassment in the future of the game from what he might have been and what he turned out to be. Jamaica doesn't need him or for that matter the CFU. Where did all the money go to help football development in the 30 CFU countries. I have heard JW has a business in Central America, the USA, a hotel, travel agent and our Father only knows what. ONLY hear says mind you. Let us get on with the game and let him remain only as a government job for T & T as long as he's tolerated there. If anyone thinks different they need to sort that out with the Father in heaven for there does lay the truth.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Pbanta View Post
          The World of football in the CFU and CONCACAF and more than likely many all ready knew what FIFA would say to JW and what past docs they had to prove that Jack Warner never needs to return to the game. We need to realize and find him an embarrassment in the future of the game from what he might have been and what he turned out to be. Jamaica doesn't need him or for that matter the CFU. Where did all the money go to help football development in the 30 CFU countries. I have heard JW has a business in Central America, the USA, a hotel, travel agent and our Father only knows what. ONLY hear says mind you. Let us get on with the game and let him remain only as a government job for T & T as long as he's tolerated there. If anyone thinks different they need to sort that out with the Father in heaven for there does lay the truth.
          P, I am no fan of JW, but if he can evenly remotely contribute to ripping away the shroud under which FIFA conducts its business, more power to him, as long as that also means he no longer returns to football.
          "H.L & Brick .....mi deh pan di wagon (Man City)" - X_____ http://www.reggaeboyzsc.com/forum1/showthread.php?p=378365&highlight=City+Liverpool#p ost378365

          X DESCRIBES HIMSELF - Stop masquerading as if you have the clubs interest at heart, you are a fraud, always was and always will be in any and every thing that you present...

          Comment


          • #6
            I would hazard a guess that any (or most ) FIFA execs have been able to similarly build themselves a small empire a la JW due to, and solely because of their affiliation with FIFA. JW certainly profited as has his immediate family.

            There is no doubt that he is now a wealthy man by any measure. The "problem" with any accusation of corruption that he will now bring against his former colleagues, is credible proof that will stand up to scrutiny.
            Peter R

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Peter R View Post
              I

              The "problem" with any accusation of corruption that he will now bring against his former colleagues, is credible proof that will stand up to scrutiny.
              I am sure he is in possession of that "credible proof"...but I am thinking that proof will also provide self-incrimination and potentially 'take down' some of his 'FIFA friends'.

              So will he go so far as to provide that "credible proof"?
              "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

              Comment


              • #8
                Yers Our Hope

                Originally posted by Karl View Post
                I am sure he is in possession of that "credible proof"...but I am thinking that proof will also provide self-incrimination and potentially 'take down' some of his 'FIFA friends'.

                So will he go so far as to provide that "credible proof"?

                This would our great hope. The game belongs to the honest and the players as it should be.

                Comment

                Working...
                X