BIG Surprise!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Peter R]

jack warner re-elected unopposed as president of CFU... didn't think he could pull that off an 8th time! (sarcasm emoticon)

[Gamma]

NO?!!! yuh too lie!!!!????

[Farmah]

Prezi fi life....ah dat Jack ah defen'

[Hortical]

Yuh haffi check fi di democratic process fi real. If not Jack, then who?

[Peter R]

In fact i don't know if the vote was taken yet, but EVERY incumbent was nominated unopposed, including vp burrell.... in other words not a thing will have changed when the vote takes place.

[Gamma]

nothing will be forthcoming from within .....

[Mosiah]

yuh memba what happen di last time smaddy try upset di apple cart?

[Hortical]

Was it a three year suspension that hit the out of line subjects?

[Karl]

Peter: Besides the viseral opposition to "Jack" what is the

problem?

jack warner re-elected unopposed as president of CFU... didn't think he could pull that off an 8th time! (sarcasm emoticon)

When did the CFU come into being?

Have there been improvements in Caribbean football - administration, physical plants (e.g. Centers of Excellence), standard of play in many of the countries?

Has our administrators receiving ongoing training and advancing within FIFA...where formerly we were not represented?

Has our referees being well respected and having both assistant referee and referee handling finals of the large FIFA tournaments?

...and on and on...?

How do you stack those positives against the perceived weaknesses of "Jack"?

Peter: I come down on the side of "Jack".

[Paul Marin]

problem?



When did the CFU come into being?

Have there been improvements in Caribbean football - administration, physical plants (e.g. Centers of Excellence), standard of play in many of the countries?

Has our administrators receiving ongoing training and advancing within FIFA...where formerly we were not represented?

Has our referees being well respected and having both assistant referee and referee handling finals of the large FIFA tournaments?

...and on and on...?

How do you stack those positives against the perceived weaknesses of "Jack"?

Peter: I come down on the side of "Jack".

I know you asked Peter the question and not me...but beg me shub mi mout' inna dis likkle bit. Karl, the problem is not the "ends" it is the "means". If you believe that the "ends justifies the means" then becoming a millionaire by tiefing other people money should be okay with you (as Jack has done). This is the problem Karl, as upstanding members of society, we want to make sure that the means by which we have come by what is justly ours is in and of itself defensible. Jack's "means" are not.

[Karl]

I know you asked Peter the question and not me...but beg me shub mi mout' inna dis likkle bit. Karl, the problem is not the "ends" it is the "means". If you believe that the "ends justifies the means" then becoming a millionaire by tiefing other people money should be okay with you (as Jack has done). This is the problem Karl, as upstanding members of society, we want to make sure that the means by which we have come by what is justly ours is in and of itself defensible. Jack's "means" are not.

I hear you and you make good points...but not one person or entity has currently laid 'a finger' on "Jack".

[Mosiah]

you know fifa has rules about civil court, right?

[Gamma]

AND government interference!

[Karl]

oooh yes!

[Karl]

Certainly!

dem suh-mart eenh?