RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Observer EDITORIAL: The good, bad and ugly of football

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Observer EDITORIAL: The good, bad and ugly of football

    The good, bad and ugly of football

    Saturday, December 04, 2010


    The hype surrounding the selection of hosts for the 2018 and 2022 editions of the FIFA World Cup reminds us of the extraordinary power of football.

    After years of lobbying, both publicly and beneath the radar, the spending of untold millions of dollars by aspiring countries and the almost obligatory allegations of corruption surrounding bids, Russia won the support of the majority of FIFA's 22 voters for the 2018 World Cup.

    In the process they out-bid England, and the joint applications of Spain-Portugal and Belgium-Netherlands.

    For the global football establishment, the real shocker was the choice of the tiny, oil-rich Qatar for the 2022 World Cup. The Persian Gulf emirate beat the United States 14-8 to send the clear message that size and traditions don't matter so much if the coffers are full.

    Given the current economic realities, there really is no chance of the Caribbean hosting the senior FIFA World Cup for decades to come. But the success of Qatar surely suggests that some of us alive today may just live to witness such an eventuality.

    For now, countries like Jamaica and its neighbours in the Caribbean Football Union (CFU) must work on improving the quality of football and all its support services, including coaching and backroom administration.
    The drive must also continue to gradually 'professionalise' the game region-wide.

    In terms of improving quality, the annual Digicel Caribbean Cup — which also serves as the qualifying tournament for the CONCACAF Gold Cup and is now in its final stages — is of vital importance.

    This commentary went to press before the playing of last night's semi-final against Grenada — a team that has given the Reggae Boyz plenty of trouble in the past. But whatever the result of last night's game, Jamaican football lovers would have been pleased with the team's performance up to then.

    The clear indication up to last night was that the national team was well along on the road to comfortably retaining its title as Caribbean champions.

    For those same fans and indeed the entire nation, the fly in the ointment was the threatened withdrawal of service by our national players over a pay dispute with the Jamaica Football Federation (JFF).

    Reports of highly respected national players insisting they would not "lace up" for their country unless their financial demands were met have caused extreme disquiet and — as inevitably happens in such situations — led some to question the players' sense of patriotism.

    We hear the explanation from senior professional Mr Shavar Thomas that the players had been asked to make considerable sacrifices over an extended period embracing 12 International games and that the JFF should make the sacrifice "this time around". We note also the point made by those overseas pros that their stance wasn't influenced by personal need but to ensure that their less fortunate colleagues who operate in the cash-starved local league got their due.

    The truth though is that the JFF is broke. That was evidenced by the reality that JFF president Captain Horace Burrell in his words was moved to take money "from my own personal funds" in order to meet the players' demands.

    The players and their supporters may well argue that the JFF is at fault for not handling the crisis differently.

    This newspaper believes though that regardless of the provocation, real or imagined, the ultimatum delivered by the players last weekend should be a 'no-no'. They should have found a better way to make their case.


    Read more: http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/edito...#ixzz17EGGFIRD
    "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

  • #2
    This newspaper believes though that regardless of the provocation, real or imagined, the ultimatum delivered by the players last weekend should be a 'no-no'. They should have found a better way to make their case.


    Thats the problem , the media can question the players national pride but not the JFF because they are broke ?

    A better way should have been found by the players to deal with it but the JFF is absolved from trying to deal with it because they are broke ?

    Are these journalist for real , after 12 international games of being underpaid and in some cases not paid , the jamaican media expects the players to deal with it another way , preferrably wait until the JFF says its in good financial order to pay the player?

    Has that ever happened ?

    Where is the JFF patriotic pride to take care of its own (the players )?

    I am sorry but the journalist is an idiot and he should labour for free to print his articles when Butch says he is broke out of patriotic pride! yes only 12 months ..try doing it from the inception of the JFF !
    THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

    "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


    "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

    Comment


    • #3
      You have made your point very well!
      ...yup where does the JFF's responsibility to the players...and thus the nation, begin?!
      "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

      Comment


      • #4
        Karl, I'm a little confused; maybe you can help me out. PLaying for your country is it considered a job or an honour? Do clubs continue to pay thier players when they are playing for their country? The JFF is broke, is it because the Captain rob them?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by TheDread View Post
          Karl, I'm a little confused; maybe you can help me out. PLaying for your country is it considered a job or an honour? Do clubs continue to pay thier players when they are playing for their country? The JFF is broke, is it because the Captain rob them?
          Playing for your country is an honour. ...and the leaders of the JFF should treat you, not as an ass or trash but should show appreciation.

          The treatment should be as any other who represents the country - the PM, the Ambassadors and Consuls, our referees (as treated by FIFA and the JFF)...etc., etc.

          It sure as hell must bear some relationship to what is the top countries norm as it relates to timing of that contract arrangement...and within the context of the JFF's financial position.

          It sure as hell demands the JFF taking appropriate steps to inform the team and each individual player of exactly what is being offered....and brokering a contract with each player on the offer the JFF makes.

          It sure as hell must never be that the JFF either waits until the last minute to inform the players of the terms and conditions under which they are asked to represent the country...or for that matter put itself in a position where the terms and conditions agreed are not set in stone previous to each player accepting a place on the TEAM.

          Any coming of the JFF with the terms and conditions after the players are already assembled...forget going so far as to be attempting to hammer out terms and conditions during the tournament (in this latter case, no one could blame the players if they all left for home)...is disrespectful to the players and shows the JFF as an inept body!

          Apparently the JFF brass think they are men and the players are dogs?

          The players must take some blame as the JFF's history...past behaviour is a predictor of future behaviour...should have led them to knowing they were dealing with inept persons and they should have acted accordingly...refused the offer to represent the country under conditions that were not agreed in good time.
          Last edited by Karl; December 5, 2010, 06:24 PM.
          "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

          Comment


          • #6
            To put it another way , yes its an honour like it is for the powers that be(JFF) to treat them with patriotic honour.

            Crying yuh bruk is an excuse to do what?...........you guessed it nothing.
            THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

            "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


            "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Karl View Post
              Playing for your country is an honour. ...and the leaders of the JFF should treat you, not as an ass or trash but should show appreciation.

              The treatment should be as any other who represents the country - the PM, the Ambassadors and Consuls, our referees (as treated by FIFA and the JFF)...etc., etc.

              It sure as hell must bear some relationship to what is the top countries norm as it relates to timing of that contract arrangement...and within the context of the JFF's financial position.

              It sure as hell demands the JFF taking appropriate steps to inform the team and each individual player of exactly what is being offered....and brokering a contract with each player on the offer the JFF makes.

              It sure as hell must never be that the JFF either waits until the last minute to inform the players of the terms and conditions under which they are asked to represent the country...or for that matter put itself in a position where the terms and conditions agreed are not set in stone previous to each player accepting a place on the TEAM.

              Any coming of the JFF with the terms and conditions after the players are already assembled...forget going so far as to be attempting to hammer out terms and conditions during the tournament (in this latter case, no one could blame the players if they all left for home)...is disrespectful to the players and shows the JFF as an inept body!

              Apparently the JFF brass think they are men and the players are dogs?

              The players must take some blame as the JFF's history...past behaviour is a predictor of future behaviour...should have led them to knowing they were dealing with inept persons and they should have acted accordingly...refused the offer to represent the country under conditions that were not agreed in good time.

              I have seen glimpses of how boxhill group treated our players and it was more or less a master - servant type relationship. The players represent us and deserve to be treated with respect and dignity. i don't know how Burrell's organization work with the players, but from the debacle I suspect that they still need to learn more about leadership and management. We don't have the same resources as many other countries so we need to all (players included) pitch in to make this thing work for us. The JFF needs to be more open with the players and public to develop the trust and respect needed so that we can all feel comfortable in sacrificing for the greater good.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by TheDread View Post
                I have seen glimpses of how boxhill group treated our players and it was more or less a master - servant type relationship. The players represent us and deserve to be treated with respect and dignity. i don't know how Burrell's organization work with the players, but from the debacle I suspect that they still need to learn more about leadership and management.
                Poor Crenston!

                So, the JFF's disrespect towards players only started in 2004.

                Ah see!


                BLACK LIVES MATTER

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Mosiah View Post
                  Poor Crenston!

                  So, the JFF's disrespect towards players only started in 2004.

                  Ah see!
                  Brethren, are you blind or you just want to act the fool? I have personally seen Boxjuices admin. treatment of the players. I have no personal insight into Burrell's group. And when I trained with the under 17 side in the late 70's we were treated well by the coaches.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    okay sah! mi blind and fool-fool!


                    BLACK LIVES MATTER

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X