<P align=left>Arthur Wharton was the world's first Black professional footballer and 100 yards world record holder. He was probably the first African to play professional cricket in the Yorkshire and Lancashire leagues. But while he was beating the best on the tracks and fields of Britain, the peoples of the continent of his birth were being recast as lesser human beings. The tall Ghanaian irritated white supremacists because his education and sporting triumphs refuted their theories. In the late Victorian era, when Britain's economic and political power reached its zenith and when the dominant ideas of the age labeled all blacks as inferior, it was simply not expedient to proclaim the exploits of an African sportsman. This shaped the way Wharton was forgotten.<P align=left>As his sporting powers waned, so did his fame and earning power. He died a penniless coal-miner, and his grave remained unmarked until 1997. His absence from the histories of football, and to a lesser extent athletics, is being righted, yet this book shows that the deeds of many black and working class people suffered the same fate.<P align=left>The last chapter attempts to explain why Arthur Wharton, such an important figure from the history of sport in Britain, was so quickly forgotten.<P align=left><P class=MsoNormal style="LINE-HEIGHT: 200%; TEXT-ALIGN: center" align=center><U><SPAN lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 16pt">AN ABSENCE OF MEMORY</SPAN></U><U><SPAN lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 16pt"><?xml:namespace prefix = o /><o> </o></SPAN></U><P class=MsoNormal style="LINE-HEIGHT: 200%; TEXT-ALIGN: center" align=center><SPAN lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt">THE FORGOTTEN HISTORY OF ARTHUR WHARTON, 1865-1930, THE FIRST BLACK PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALLER<o> </o></SPAN><P class=MsoNormal style="LINE-HEIGHT: 200%; TEXT-ALIGN: center" align=center><SPAN lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt"></SPAN><SPAN lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt">PHIL VASILI</SPAN><SPAN lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 16pt"> <o></o></SPAN><P class=MsoNormal style="LINE-HEIGHT: 200%; TEXT-ALIGN: center" align=center><SPAN lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 16pt"></SPAN><HR><P class=MsoNormal style="LINE-HEIGHT: 200%; TEXT-ALIGN: center" align=center><SPAN lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 16pt"><o> </o></SPAN><P class=MsoNormal style="LINE-HEIGHT: 200%; TEXT-ALIGN: center" align=center><SPAN lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 16pt">CHAPTER 13<o> </o></SPAN><P class=MsoNormal style="LINE-HEIGHT: 200%; TEXT-ALIGN: center" align=center><SPAN lang=EN-GB style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt">CLASS, ETHNICITY AND MEMORY: THE SELECTIVE APPROACH TO HISTORY</SPAN><P class=MsoNormal style="LINE-HEIGHT: 200%"><SPAN lang=EN-GB><o> </o></SPAN><P class=MsoNormal style="LINE-HEIGHT: 200%"><SPAN lang=EN-GB><o> </o></SPAN><P class=MsoNormal style="LINE-HEIGHT: 200%"><U><SPAN lang=EN-GB>Of Princes</SPAN></U><P class=MsoNormal style="LINE-HEIGHT: 200%"><SPAN lang=EN-GB>A sporting contemporary of Arthur’s was KS Ranjitsinhji an Indian prince who used the cricket bat to produce fleeting moments of wonder and lasting memories of beauty. During the summer of 1899 he beat the scoring record of the legendary WG Grace by accumulating 3,000 runs over the season. In Beyond A Boundary Trinidadian Marxist CLR James leaves the reader in no doubt as to the elevated status and place ‘Ranji’ held - and still holds - within the sport. He was revered by followers of cricket throughout the British empire. He is irremovable from the pantheon of Great Names of Cricket.</SPAN><P class=MsoNormal style="LINE-HEIGHT: 200%"><SPAN lang=EN-GB><o> </o></SPAN><P class=MsoNormal style="LINE-HEIGHT: 200%"><SPAN lang=EN-GB>Why has this not been so for Wharton
RBSC
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The first Black professional footballer
Collapse
X
-
The first Black professional footballer
THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!
"Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.
"It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.Tags: None
-
RE: The first Black professional footballer
<P class=MsoNormal style="LINE-HEIGHT: 200%"><SPAN lang=EN-GB>Goalkeepers were not formally acknowledged until 1871 when the FA inserted a rule that allowed those so designated to handle the ball anywhere in their half of the field. Though Sheffield Rules football had referred to the goalkeeper before this time, defining the position literally: anyone on the defending team who is nearest to his own goal. Until the 1890s a goalkeeper could be downed by one or more attackers (in an onside position), whether or not he had the ball. The more organised teams would use a rusher, a forward whose job it was to do just this. Any goalie foolish enough to catch a ball and hold onto it would almost certainly take a battering from any forwards within diving or lunging distance. All sides played with at least five forwards in the 1890s. This may explain Wharton’s preference for fisting the ball away rather than catching it; and, in part, his reputation as the ‘goalkeeper with the prodigious punch’. Despite his excellent timing and co-ordination, Arthur did not always connect with the ball!:</SPAN><P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in; LINE-HEIGHT: 200%"><SPAN lang=EN-GB>‘Several times...[Bridgewater of Sheffield United] charged at Wharton [of Rotherham Town] as if he meant mischief. Stand-up fights because of these charges more than once seemed imminent, but the good sense of Wharton and the timely intervention of the referee prevented anything so discreditable.’<SPAN class=MsoFootnoteReference>[17]</SPAN></SPAN><P class=MsoNormal style="LINE-HEIGHT: 200%"><SPAN lang=EN-GB></SPAN><P class=MsoNormal style="LINE-HEIGHT: 200%"><SPAN lang=EN-GB>The position of goalkeeper suited Arthur’s character. Despite the great risk of personal injury that in the 1880s would have threatened his potential as a sprinter, the potential for freedom of expression appealed to the extrovert in Arthur. Whether he could have played successfully in other positions is a moot point. He certainly could not have done with the same skill, agility, exuberance and longevity of professional career. As goalkeeper he had<SPAN> </SPAN>freedom to roam - to the half-way line, beyond even -and take shots at goal. This would not have been unusual. Only from 1912 were goalies restricted to handling the ball within the newly marked penalty area. Swinging from the bar, as has been noted, was another speciality. A letter<SPAN> </SPAN>writer to the<SPAN> </SPAN>Sheffield Telegraph and Independent, recalled (half a century after the event).</SPAN><P class=MsoNormal style="LINE-HEIGHT: 200%"><SPAN lang=EN-GB></SPAN><P class=MsoNormal style="LINE-HEIGHT: 200%"><SPAN lang=EN-GB>I learnt something today </SPAN>THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!
"Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.
"It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.
-
RE: The first Black professional footballer
In a match between Rotherham and [Sheffield] Wednesday at Olive Grove I saw Wharton jump, take hold of the cross bar, catch the ball between his legs, and cause three onrushing forwards - Billy Ingham, Clinks Mumford and Micky Bennett - to fall into the net. I have never seen a similar save since and I have been watching football for over fifty years.’<SPAN class=MsoFootnoteReference>[18]</SPAN>.THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!
"Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.
"It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.
Comment
Comment