RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The struggle of African coaches

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The struggle of African coaches

    The struggle of African coaches

    Post categories: Football
    Piers Edwards|15:09 UK time, Friday, 26 March 2010
    Ever since South Africa was awarded the2010 World Cup, the organisers' oft-repeated desire has been for a pan-African World Cup.
    On the coaching front, they are going to be disappointed because AlgerianRabah Saadanewill stick out like a sore thumb in June as the only African coach among the continent's six finalists.

    It would have been two butNigeria's Shaibu Amodu was forced outafter the Nations Cup earlier this year. We can also safely predict that the Ivory Coast's new coach won't be African, withMark Hughes, Sven-Goran Eriksson and Bernd Schuster apparently the three main contenders.

    A look at Africa's World Cup history, not to mention tradition, should have prepared us for such a reality.
    Algeria's Rabah Saadane will be the only African coach at the World Cup
    Of the 34 African teams that will have contested the World Cup come June, 24 will have been led by a foreigner.
    If you want to break that down, nine sides will have been led by a Frenchman, five by a Yugoslav-born coach, two apiece by a German and a Brazilian and the rest by a Scot, Dutchman, Russian, Franco-Pole and Swede.
    The 24th looks like being either a Welshman, Swede or German.

    With no African having ever taken his nation into the World Cup second round, these foreign appointments look set to continue - even if Saadane achieves the unexpected against Slovenia, England and the United States in Group C.

    Saadane almost helped create history back in the early 1980s. The experienced 63-year-old, who led Algeria at their last finals in 1986, worked as an assistant to both Mahieddinne Khalef and Rachid Mekloufi in 1982, which is when Africa's coaching dreams received a heavy blow.

    Had the infamous'Shame of Gijon'match between Austria and West Germany been played differently, an African coaching team may have led their nation out of the group stages for the one and so far only time.

    Whether that would have changed anything is a moot point, especially since local coaches have been fighting for recognition ever since football was introduced to Africa by European missionaries, servicemen and the like.

    "The missionaries in Nigeria weren't coaches or players themselves, but they became experts because they knew the game in England," says Nigeria'sSegun Odegbami, who won the 1980 Nations Cup, albeit under a Brazilian coach. "We depended on them. Later, a Father Slattery, though just a low-standard referee back home, became Nigeria coach."

    In time, more professional coaches arrived, and Scotland's James McRea, a player with West Ham and Manchester United, unwittingly set the tone for Africa's World Cup outings whenleading Egypt at the continent's maiden finals in 1934.

    Fans had to wait another 44 years for Africa's first World Cup coach, with Abdelmajid Chetali leading Tunisia to the continent's first finals win - a 3-1 defeat of Mexico.
    While North African federations have handed the reins to a compatriot on more than half their 13 World Cup visits, those in sub-Sahara have proved mightily reluctant. It wasn't until 2002 that a sub-Saharan nation first travelled to the finals with their own coach, as two buses came along at once - Festus Onigbinde driving Nigeria, Jomo Sono at the helm for South Africa.
    It didn't help that, while Nigeria and South Africa floundered, little-fanciedSenegal, guided by Frenchman Bruno Metsu, became the second African nation to reach the quarter-finals.
    Cameroon's Roger Milla-led side had been the first in 1990, under the tutelage of little-known Russian Valery Nepomniachi, and to this day the Indomitable Lions have never been led by a Cameroonian at the World Cup.
    Sellas Tetteh led Ghana to U20 World Cup glory in 2009
    This isdespite winning the 2000 Olympics with a local man, Jean-Paul Akonoguiding his team to success over a Spain side boasting Xavi, Carles Puyol et al in Sydney.
    "We've won world titles at U17, U20 and U23 level under local coaches but that's not being recognised," laments former South Africa coach Trott Moloto. "Having one African coach here for the World Cup indicates the lack of confidence our people have in our own people - it's very negative."

    Especially when considering that five of Africa's six U17 or U20 World Cup wins were won by African coaches (only two of whom ever graduated to a full-time senior role), whileSellas Tetteh's reward for making Ghana U20 world champions last year is a post with Rwanda, which is all well and good but he was probably expecting more.

    As recently witnessed in Nigeria, a local's path to the top is incredibly fraught. Despite achieving his set targets of World Cup qualification and the 2010 Nations Cup semi-finals, Amodu was still dismissed for the unconvincing nature of his performances.
    In his place came a man who has never coached in Africa, who has yet to meet his players but upon whom a great deal is expected - if only for five months before eitherLars Lagerbackcuts his losses or the Nigerian federation does.

    What the Swede does have though is top-level European experience - and that's what many African federations are after, believing that superior innovations, tactics and discipline lie outside the continent (don't mention Berti Vogts to Nigerian fans).

    So too, we're often told, a perceived imperviousness to any tribal or shady influences (e.g. putting players in a national team simply so as to inflate their transfer fee).

    In truth, it's a massive topic with many pros and cons, one which polarises opinion and one which will always be fiercely debated across the continent.

    But one certainty is that various African coaches will watch with envy as Serbia's Milovan Rajevac leads Ghana, Frenchman Paul Le Guen, who led Lyon to three straight titles, handles Cameroon and Brazil's 1994 World Cup-winning coach Carlos Alberto Parreira guides hosts South Africa.

    South Africa's FA has promised that once the World Cup is over, a local man will take over - with SuperSport Utd coachGavin Hunt heavily tipped for the job- but that's only after the finals of course.

    "African administrators believe local coaches are only good for a Nations Cup, not the World Cup," adds Moloto.

    Like so many African federations, South Africa wanted a man with international experience to lead them in June but this is a classic chicken-and-egg case, for how can these coaches gain such experience or show their worth when so few are given the chance (or indeed the right support)?

    And, tongue-firmly-in-cheek, has anyone ever told them that no country has won the World Cup with an expatriate coach?
    THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

    "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


    "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

  • #2
    • Some simple facts.

      African teams choose who they believe to be the best candidate. This will usually be an individual who has experience of managing at the very top level of Elite football. Unfortunately for African Coaches, that level of competition exists primarlity in Europe.

      Therefore they will go with the best European experienced coach they can acquire. They did not always attract a high calibre of coach in the past from Europe. But I believe more managers are willing to take on such a job now having seen the wonders it has done for Guus Hiddink with SK, and the likes of Metsu within Africa.

      The standard of Afican International football ahs also improved durastically in the last 20 years, with more and more migration of players into the european leagues. Particularly in the 1990's in France and Belgium.

      With most top starts playing in European leagues, they need to eb managed by somebody who has coached at their level of football. Until African coaches make their mark on European teams...this will not happen.

      Perhaps we will see this generation of players become successful managers in the future?

      The likes of Geroge Weah and Adebi Pele could easily have found managerial jobs in Europe but chose not to, why may this be?
    • 4. At 4:57pm on 26 Mar 2010, Quintus wrote:African Administrators particularly the ones in Nigeria, destroy the confidence of the local coaches and maladministrate for their own selfish agenda. The public and heads of state have to force the foreign choice option to get better results. However it has not worked effectively to develop the game and local competence. The local leagues have to develop with discipline and consistency to allow managerial expertise and competence to develop. Egypt is a perfect example of this.
    • 5. At 5:13pm on 26 Mar 2010, freddawlanen wrote:It's a sad indictment on football in general, after all we're (England) led by an Italian and not long before that, a Swede.

      If only to make it a true nations tournament, would it not be better for the sport to impose a world cup rule that has the same criteria for management and all staff as for the players, ie. you must be a citizen of that country, or at the very least, have not had a similar role with another nation.
    • 6. At 6:40pm on 26 Mar 2010, Subterranean wrote:Who cares what nationality the coach is?

      Bora Milutinovic has done some great work with what would be considered 'minor' countries in the world, and I am sure Russia is thankful for Guus Hiddink's work in getting them to the Euro 2008 semi finals, their best performance since the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Hiddink also did fine work with Australia and South Korea.

      It's not purely an 'African thing' and I find this blog slightly patronising to be honest. Why do European commentators feel they need to adopt this paternalistic, liberal and charitable tone when talking about Africa? The African associations can employ whoever they want to coach their national teams. England did exactly the same when they appointed Eriksson and Capello. The England cricket team was very happy to employ Duncan Fletcher (Zimbabwean) as coach and Troy Cooley (Australian) as a bowling coach in the 2005 Ashes win and no one talks about their nationalities.

      So why does Africa have a problem? Where are the successful english coaches then? Why didn't Stuart Pearce or Peter Taylor get the England job? Would people have McClaren back as England manager after the work he has done with Twente? Why is this purely an African 'problem'- has anyone written a blog about the lack of success of English coaches lately?
    • 7. At 6:53pm on 26 Mar 2010, mcsen10 wrote:Nice blog.

      Not that the nationality of coach shoud matter but the biggest problem for home grown coaches in many african countries is always team selection. Plus, a competition like world cup for Africans, who have only have 5 places despite being over 50 nations, is a competition against the western teams, and having a foreigh coach is sure-way to be able to compete. Numbers do not lie, that is why the best African success has been achieved with a foreign coach.
    • 8. At 8:37pm on 26 Mar 2010, KT wrote:It's a bit like English Football in the Top flight too. Their is a huge void in talent in English Football from a coaching perspective. Old 'Arry at Spurs seems to be the only fella worth his salt. Over past few years whenever a new England coach has been spoken about the two common names are Allardyce and Pierce. That would be scary for English National Team.

      You are right though the majority of the African Federations pay foreign coaches huge sums of cash to coach and very little succeed. Better off investing in facilities. South Africa for example is always associated with Rugby however, Soccer is played by more people that Rugby in South AFrica, yest when you compare facilities and even pitches at the top level the gap is astonishing.
    • 9. At 8:49pm on 26 Mar 2010, Orkaambe wrote:Great blog Piers. This is a worthy contribution to the debate on football administration on the continent. I'm less bothered about the composition of coaches as compared to the financial drain on African budgets. Football is a bloody waste of tax payers money in Africa.

      Take Nigeria as a point in case. Lägerbeck will earn 1.8m USD for 20 weeks' work. That sum is equivalent to what he earned over a decade coaching the Swedish team. Such waste of money when there are pressing needs on the continent.

      SA has wasted billions building stadiums across the country whereas that money would have better served improving living conditions in slums across the country. Why Africa buys into this crazy culture remains baffling. Elsewhere, adverstising revenue sustains football, not in Africa.

      African football is all about corruption and extorting from the masses. It is high time governments stop wasting scarce resources on football and sports in general. They should allow the sponsorship and funding of sports to businesses and the private sector.

      No sane business man, whose earned his money legitimately, will pay Lägerbeck and others of his caliber such ridiculous sums for a bit part summer job. I would rather have an African coach earn a fraction of that sum. Amodu is being owed by the NFF as are Berti Vogts before him and Christian Chukwu. The list is endless.

      Trot Moloto is right in his analysis, African administrators and football fans suffer unimaginable complexies. They just feel a coach from Europe is better whereas these are often third rate coaches. So much folly from a continent that resisted colonialism.
    • 10. At 9:32pm on 26 Mar 2010, boxing_is_dead wrote:that is a really good blog. Im from africa and i personally wish we'd give our local coaches the opportunity to prove themselves, who knows we might have the next sir alex in our own backyard.
    • 11. At 10:38pm on 26 Mar 2010, Youcef M wrote:I hope that what you said (Sadaane being the only African manager in this coming world cup) is true. There has been rumors for a while now, especially after the 3-0 defeat to Serbia at home last month, that Sadaane is to be sacked and replaced by a world-class manager (i.e. a foreigner). Or if he does not get sacked, they are trying to get him an assistant (most likely a foreigner) to be his No. 2. Sadaane made it clear that if he is forced to get another assistant chosen by the Algerian Football Federation he will quit.
      So, what I am trying to say is that from now to the world cup Sadaane might not be the coach of the Algerian National team, which will be unfair as he was the one who guided the team to the world cup and therefore he should manage the team in that tournament.


    • 12. At 10:45pm on 26 Mar 2010, geoffers1979 wrote:#6

      I think the point being made is that with Africa, the lack of homegrown coaches is more of a continental, rather than national issue. Yes, England don't have any top coaches at the moment, but the majority of European nations can pick from a pool of homegrown bosses.

      I agree with #3. There are so many African players now throughout Europe and they will be gaining enough experience of top level football to put that to use as coaches. I think will see an increase in the no. of African coaches in the next 20 years.

      http://www.worldfootballcolumns.com/
    • 13. At 11:07pm on 26 Mar 2010, frankiefranklin78 wrote:No country has won the World Cup with an expatriate coach? capello your country expects!!!!
    • 14. At 02:19am on 27 Mar 2010, I am the BBC Moderator wrote:Interesting read indeed. Think of it, winning the World Cup is more of a passion than a job really. That's why the results always favor a local coach. Yes, the expat (import, or whatever) may bring in the experience, but maybe during qualification which usually spans 10 games in 24 months. But the World Cup winner needs 7 games in 1 month. That's where the crunch comes in. PASSION
    • 15. At 02:31am on 27 Mar 2010, I am the BBC Moderator wrote:Piers
      I've always tried to be as honest as i possibly can on your Blog, but now I give up!! In all the cases I've posted, I'm awaiting moderation. You know why? You guys are too stringent.

      Ever wondered why other blogs get like 200, 300 posts? when you can muster 15 (including this one) almost 12 hours after posting?
    • 16. At 05:31am on 27 Mar 2010, buymespresso wrote:I remember Zimbabwean coach Sunday Marimo complaining about just this issue in the early 90s... basically he and other coaches were complaining about how the local coaches would go to Europe and get the same coaches that the European coaches got but the local footballing authorities would still ignore them. (He was finally made Zim national coach in 2004 and, a couple of stints later, currently occupies that post.)

      Now it's fine if the non-African coach has a global rep already, like Bora Milutinovic or Guus Hiddink. But it's only recently that African footballing confederations have had enough money to hire coaches like that. For decades the foreign coaches hired had little coaching experience, even at club level.

      For example, with the Cameroon team at Italia 90, Valeri Nepomniachi had only one season of coaching Stroitel Ashgabat (a lower division Soviet club, probably in Turkmenistan) before he was given the job of coaching the Cameroon national team. It was reported (possibly true, possibly not) that since he didnt speak English or French, all communication with his players was through a translator (who didnt know much about football) and that the players would get together before the game to discuss tactics by themselves.

      If it hadn't been for Roger Milla - who was only put in because some politician ordered it - how far would Cameroon have got in Italia 90? Has everyone forgotten that they got thrashed 4-0 by the USSR in their final group game?

      African countries should either hire top world class coaches or use their own coaches. Or hire coaches from other African countries. The North African teams are a lot better about trusting their locals to coach.

      Having said that, it's hard to say what's wrong with the Nigerian authorities appointing Lagerback - the bloke at least has nine years coaching Sweden and took them to two World Cups. Cameroon have Paul le Guen, who coached four top division French & Scottish teams for 18 years and is probably a better coach than the current French national coach. (Then again, who isn't?) There is also no way one can complain about the coaching credentials of South Africa's coach Carlos Perreira.

      But Ghana's coach Milovan Rajevac - um. Big question mark there - he's coached four top division Serbian clubs, including Red Star Belgrade, but he hasn't lasted too long at any of them.

      I was surprised Stephen Keshi didnt get a mention in this article, seeing as the Nigerian coached Togo (getting booted out for a foreign coach once he took them to the 2006 World Cup) and Mali (who fired him when they got kicked out of the African Cup of nations owing to arcane group tie-breaking rules).

      Hassan Shehata's been coaching Egypt since 2004, which is pretty long. Pity Zambia drew with Egypt in Cairo, eh?
    • 17. At 07:17am on 27 Mar 2010, Phil wrote:Good blog as ever Piers.

      Its hard to know whats best for African football. Its surely beneficial to have some of the best managers managing their teams. But are these foreigners always the best for the job? For example: Lars Lagerbeck failed to qualify with Sweden and as a reward he gets a top African team! It doesnt make sense. HE FAILED! The same as Brian Laws getting the Burnley job after FAILING with Wednesday. It seems too many people oppointing managers are more interested in experience rather than SUCCESS!!!

      Lets wait and see whether these 'shrewd' appointments will pay off for the African nations.
    • 18. At 08:19am on 27 Mar 2010, yakubusdiet wrote:The reason why black Africa does not have more black men in charge of national teams is because hardly any hold legitimate coaching qualifications.

      In Nigeria, for example, only Siasia and Keshi have completed internationally-recognised training courses and obtained a coaching Pro Licence, while Eguavoen is doing so. But Amodu keeps being recycled as national coach in spite of lacking the qualifications he would need to be allowed to coach any club in Europe, Asia or the Americas.

      Amodu's ignorance of coaching knowledge showed itself on many levels. His Nigeria played a rigid 4-3-3, but with three defensive midfielders and with his full-backs forbidden to attack. He designed Nigeria's World Cup preparation with a pre-tournament camp in London and a tournament one in Durban: he clearly does not have any grasp of the effects of high altitude.

      The only black African coach with the credentials to lead Nigeria at the World Cup was Jean Tigana, yet the NFF refused even to shortlist him for fear of having to deal with a black man who would dare to answer back.

      Even the New Zealand coach Ricki Herbert went to Europe to obtain a UEFA Pro Licence. No major African country should consider appointing a coach of any colour unless he has a full Pro Licence.
    • 19. At 09:56am on 27 Mar 2010, fabulousRedsReds wrote:Sometimes it is better to have a foreign coach than a local one, especially if the local one is some kind of a local hero. Look at Argentina - they have attackers like Higuain, Tevez, Aguero, Messi, Milito, Cruz etc. Their headache is 'who should we leave out?' England, on the other hand is seriously debating Crouch, Zamora, Carton Cole, DeFoe, Heskey.. Compare these to the Argetina names! Yet many commentators believe that England will do better than Argentina come SA 2010.. All because the Argentines want to have their popular local manager.

    • 20. At 10:06am on 27 Mar 2010, red lion wrote:Good blog and good topic. The real problem is that the local administrators of the game are people of dubious character. The administrators find it easier to manipulate foreign coaches to achieve often dubious ends. Not infrequently the administrators inflate the foreign coaches terms and conditions, something the locals cannot accept. The administrators are frequently on a mission to use football as a stepping stone to political office. They lack professionalism and as in the mentioned case of Nigeria even a low ranking referee can become a coach. In Kenya we had a German character with the unlikely name of Hey. Hey would only meet the national team at the away venues where they frequently lost. He would then first go to Germany and it is only when the critism and analysis had cooled he would then show his face. It is well known that in the recent past Kenya has done better under local coaches (Mulei and Kimanzi). The downward plunge in the FIFA ranking is proof of this phenomenon.
    • 21. At 10:12am on 27 Mar 2010, red lion wrote:@18 the so called qualification are not the end all of coaching. I hope you have heard of 'the Kaiser' who despite not having your so highly valued papers is to date the only man to have captained and coached a world cup winning team. Maradona is trying to emulate this feat, and the last time I checked he had not attempted to attain acquire the papers. So that line of reasoning may not be entirely correct.
    • 22. At 10:20am on 27 Mar 2010, GabbyOk wrote:2. At 4:29pm on 26 Mar 2010, Imagine Reason wrote:

      No country has won the World Cup with an expatriate coach? Damn.

      -----------------------------------------------------------------------

      Its never occurred to me either. Nice one Piers!

      -----------------------------------------------------------------------

      6. At 6:40pm on 26 Mar 2010, Subterranean wrote:

      Who cares what nationality the coach is?

      Bora Milutinovic has done some great work with what would be considered 'minor' countries in the world, and I am sure Russia is thankful for Guus Hiddink's work in getting them to the Euro 2008 semi finals, their best performance since the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Hiddink also did fine work with Australia and South Korea.

      It's not purely an 'African thing' and I find this blog slightly patronising to be honest. Why do European commentators feel they need to adopt this paternalistic, liberal and charitable tone when talking about Africa? The African associations can employ whoever they want to coach their national teams. England did exactly the same when they appointed Eriksson and Capello. The England cricket team was very happy to employ Duncan Fletcher (Zimbabwean) as coach and Troy Cooley (Australian) as a bowling coach in the 2005 Ashes win and no one talks about their nationalities.

      So why does Africa have a problem? Where are the successful english coaches then? Why didn't Stuart Pearce or Peter Taylor get the England job? Would people have McClaren back as England manager after the work he has done with Twente? Why is this purely an African 'problem'- has anyone written a blog about the lack of success of English coaches lately?

      -----------------------------------------------------------------------

      Aren't you a bitter bloke. You do have a point though.
    • 23. At 10:28am on 27 Mar 2010, Orkaambe wrote:@18:

      The UEFA Pro License is a fairly recent phenomena and most coaches do not have that badge. The likes of Sir Alex, Wenger etc do not have this badge just as recent coaches in Woodgate, Shearer etc. Of course, it is good to attend courses and be up-to-date.

      That said, African FA's and CAF should also have their own training programmes across the continent. In Nigeria, the National Institute of Sports (NIS) is a good example of a training platform. Most Nigerian coaches have been at NIS taking grade badges in coaching and sports management.

      In additional to FA or sport ministry run courses, African Universities could offer programmes on sports management, administration and psychology. This would go a long way in shaping the future of African sports. To say every African coach should go to Europe to attend a UEFA Pro License course is uncalled for.

      The Italians have their unique way of training coaches, the Dutch have their as well. The English FA also has an independent programme whilst the Swedes have the most unique and comprehensive coach training programme of all. Swedish coaches are trained on all categories of players - from school kids to teens to adults.

      African countries should also have their unique training programmes and our coaches can also excel on their merit. Africa has long trained brilliant professionals in various fields and works of life and they have competed favourably with their peers across the globe. Why can't we replicate the same with African trained coaches?
    • 24. At 10:52am on 27 Mar 2010, fulltimeanalysis wrote:I think the idea of a foreign coach if he is a good one is a good approach. You have to give the job to the best qualified person without looking too much into nationality.

      What I don't agree with is the situation where a local coach is sacked so that he can be replaced by a foreign one. A good case in point is the Nigerian one where Amodu lost his job having secured the place at the World Cup and he was replaced by a coach who has no experience in coaching in Africa or African players but passes the big test of being foreign.

      I hope the African coaches will not be discouraged and it would be good one day to see good African coaches coach on other continents like what is happening now with the South American coaches.

    • 25. At 11:05am on 27 Mar 2010, Daniel wrote:Give me a break BBC! When will you stop demeaning Africans and the African continent as a whole? Look, your reporters go to Ghana and all they report is to stand beside guthers and report on the filth state of the country when we have them in Hackney in London.What you always do is to report only the poor state of ghana and not reporting on the Kanda highway which is the same as the M25, The health insurance system which the previous government introduced,the school feeding programme which
      also was introduced by the previous government, etc, etc.

      Now lets go back to the issue today and if I can answer it with a question? ARE YOU ( ENGLAND )GOING TO SOUTH AFRICA WITH AN ENGLISH COACH?
      So what is the rational behind your topic? Look Africa is growing and you guys should also grow and stop this old propaganda.

      Thank You
    • 26. At 11:41am on 27 Mar 2010, Jonathan wrote:As a South African, I'm afraid I have to agree with a few of the sentiments shared above. My feeling is that any successful team requires stability both on and off the pitch.

      South Africa have had a total of 17 coaches since readmission in 1992 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_A..._football_team) with 8 coaches in the last 8 years! Utter madness!
      No team can expect to be even remotely successful or competitive from year to year (World Cup to World Cup) when there is such coaching turmoil. And it is the administrators of South African football that must take the blame. No coach has ever been given a chance long enough to see his plan come to fruition.

      Unfortunately the South African administrators have been too busy finding ways of lining their pockets and handing out excessive bonuses for securing the 2010 World Cup rather than taking the time out to serious tackle the lack of footballing ability both at a national level and ground roots level.

      I agree with the fact that overseas coaches have the wealth of experience at the highest level and African football can definitely learn from this. I am hopeful, however, that with the likes of Drogba, Eto, Pienaar etc, that we will begin to see the top players returning to their roots and imparting their skills and knowledge.

      Sweet.
    • 27. At 12:00pm on 27 Mar 2010, Nasri_is_the_French_Gooner wrote:Good article piers and some interesting comments aswell but i think the main reason why africa lack some many local coaches is either based down on qualifications or finicial stability within some of africans football associations but look at egypts and algerias recent successes and you can see that their is some good in have a local coach.

      I think the whole idea that these african assocaiations take with them in terms of hiring foreign coaches is that they a betterly qualified and due to their european or past sucesses they can bring install some winning metanlity into some of those african teams dressing rooms.

      But its not about nationality at the end of the day its all about your tactical and mental awareness of the game as a coach and this is what gets you success. However where talking about international football and africa i think the problem with managing african teams is that their alot of exceptatons from the fans,country and associations to do well as most of these african players are based outside africa so theirs an element of exceptacy to perform at a higher level.

      But when things dont go well with many of these african teams they just end of sacking the manager which not only doenst bring stability but also a level of failure. How can players adapt to one coach if you keep on sacking managers and thats the main problem with these african teams. Just look at egypts and algerias coaches look how long they have been there and the success they have brang into those countries.


      Countries like Ghana,ivory coast,nigeria,cameroon and south africa as one mentioned before, keep on failing to get to those exceptations because they never seem to keep one coach for a long period which just brings confusion and havoc for many players. Another problem is that with foreign coaches they usually look at thier reputations rather than their abilites which is unfair to potential local coaches who could as good as a job of your average foreign coach
    THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

    "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


    "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

    Comment


    • #3
      One simple fact; Samuel Eto is the best player in the World, has been that way for quite some time, too bad for Messi and Ronaldo.


      Blessed

      Comment


      • #4
        With Rajevac in charge, Ghana could cause upsets

        When Milovan Rajevac applied for a vacant coaching position with Ghana, friends told him his lack of English language skills would harm his chances.

        Yet conducting all his work through a translator, the former Red Star Belgrade defender has successfully overcome the language barrier to guide the west African nation to two major championships since his arrival in August 2008.

        Despite spending both his playing and coaching careers in Serbia, Rajevac will nonetheless sit on the Black Stars bench at the World Cup in South Africa, exactly five months after reaching the African Cup of Nations final in Angola.

        (continue)
        "Donovan was excellent. We knew he was a good player, but he really didn't do anything wrong in the whole game and made it difficult for us."
        - Xavi

        Comment

        Working...
        X