RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Football chiefs set to discuss red card changes

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Football chiefs set to discuss red card changes

    Football's law-makers will decide on Saturday whether to introduce a change to the rule book which could lead to a dramatic drop in red cards - but there will be no discussion on changes to the offside rule.

    The International FA Board (IFAB) meeting in Zurich will rule on a FIFA proposal where players would no longer receive an automatic red card for denying a clear goal-scoring opportunity if the referee gives a penalty as well.

    There have been reports that FIFA president Sepp Blatter has been investigating how hockey plays without offsides, but FIFA insists there is no suggestion that he wants to bring this into football.

    The main item on the agenda is the automatic red card and there has been a growing chorus of opinion that the punishment is too harsh - a penalty, a red card for the offender and a subsequent suspension.

    Carling Cup final referee Phil Dowd came under fire when he awarded a penalty but did not dismiss Nemanja Vidic for fouling Gabriel Agbonlahor last Sunday.

    A rule change would clear up such grey areas and FIFA has submitted the item suggesting the offence is down-graded to a yellow card if a penalty is awarded.

    The IFAB agenda says the FIFA submission is "to discuss sending-off offences, particularly the triple punishment (penalty kick, red card, player suspension) that results when a player denies an obvious goal-scoring opportunity to the opposing team.''

    The IFAB is made up of the four home nations, who each have one vote, and FIFA, which has four. Any rule change needs a minimum of six votes in favour.

    Scottish FA chief executive Gordon Smith said discussion would centre around whether the current tough sanctions act as a deterrent.

    "It's an interesting one and we need to explore whether a player might be less likely to commit a foul because of the existing punishment" Smith told Press Association Sport. "It could be a preventative measure, a deterrent. If you just have yellow card you might have a lot more penalties.''

    FIFA is also raising the issue of whether players should be allowed to feint at all during the run-up to take a penalty - for some penalty-takers such as Robbie Keane it has become a trademark of their spot-kick routine. The current law is open to interpretation with feinting being permitted unless the referee considers it "an act of unsporting behaviour''.

    The role of the fourth official will be brought up by the SFA who want him or her to be allowed to have direct influence with the referee over decisions on the pitch. As things stand, the referee is supposed to only referee with his linesmen while the fourth official is concerned with policing the technical area.

    "The fourth official may have a better view than the referee but at the moment they can't influence his decision," Smith said. "We think they should have a little bit more of an input.''

    Smith may also raise Thierry Henry's escape from any disciplinary action over his handball in the World Cup play-off against the Republic of Ireland. Henry was investigated by FIFA's disciplinary committee but they decided there was nothing in the rule book under which they could punish the France striker for his handball

    The latest developments in goal-line technology and the on-going experiment in the Europa League of having two extra assistant referees behind each goal-line will also be discussed.
    Last edited by Karl; March 6, 2010, 09:38 AM.
    "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

  • #2
    It doesn't take an "investigation" to determine how hockey plays "without offsides" All Blatter has to do is go out for lunch with the president of the Swiss Hockey Federation.

    In hockey, the offside rule is very simple.

    1) The puck must precede all offensive players across the blue line, which is 60 feet from the goal.

    DELAYED OFFSIDES

    2) If the puck crosses the blue line into the team's offensive zone, with a member of the offensive team already in the zone, and the opposing team gains control of the puck, the linesman will raise his arm to signal offside but not blow the whistle to stop play. In the meantime play continues.

    The delayed offside is cancelled when a) the defensive team carries or shoots the puck beyond the blue line; or b) when the offensive player(s)
    in the offside position when the puck crossed the blue line leave the offensive zone by skating across the blue line.

    If the offensive team touches the puck in their offensive zone while a delayed offside is in effect, play will be stopped, and there will be a faceoff outside the blue line. There is no penalty.

    Comment


    • #3
      I think that if the foul is commited inside or outside of the box on a breakaway play, then a penalty should be awarded regardless and the defender gets a yellow card.
      Hey .. look at the bright side .... at least you're not a Liverpool fan! - Lazie 2/24/10 Paul Marin -19 is one thing, 20 is a whole other matter. It gets even worse if they win the UCL. *groan*. 05/18/2011.MU fans naah cough, but all a unuh a vomit?-Lazie 1/11/2015

      Comment


      • #4
        The shooter on a penalty kick should not be allowed to feint.

        If the shooter is allowed to feint, then the goalkeeper should be allowed to move forward when the referee signals the shooter to proceed.

        I also believe that there should be no rebounds on a penalty kick. This eliminates any question of "encroachment".

        If the kick fails, for any reason, the opposing team gets a goal kick.

        Comment


        • #5
          even if just over half line? hmmm, not sure bout dat!


          BLACK LIVES MATTER

          Comment


          • #6
            somehow i believe they were tlking about field hockey, which is much closer to football than ice hockey.

            i have long suggested that football follow they way of field hockey that has done away with the offside rule, making for a much more open and interesting game.


            BLACK LIVES MATTER

            Comment


            • #7
              Wonder if Lazie wants to revise his take on the ref not sending off Vidic.

              eeeeh? Ready to now say, Vidic should have been sent off? ...and withdraw the 'hit' about the need for those who said he should have been sent off needing to know the Laws of the Game?
              "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

              Comment


              • #8
                The keeper moves off his line on every damn kick anyway so it's all fair.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Karl View Post
                  Wonder if Lazie wants to revise his take on the ref not sending off Vidic.

                  eeeeh? Ready to now say, Vidic should have been sent off? ...and withdraw the 'hit' about the need for those who said he should have been sent off needing to know the Laws of the Game?
                  Again I ask, where was the cry for Carragher to be red carded when he did the same to Owen? All you hypocrites were quiet then ... suh keep quiet now!
                  "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    hehehehehehe!!!!!
                    "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X