I'm surprised by this board. Why? I can recall a friendly where Ja played to pull off a draw in the final mins. I then said Ja should proceed to play Mexico; many on this board said I was crazy, it's best Ja played some weak team such as grenada or Cayman. karl was the only one (I think) that supported my call. The reason why I said take on mexico or a heavy Euro team was because I saw where Ja was finally showing an understanding of the science of the game (this may come about due to exposure in the euro leagues). I h knew that back in the days if a team scores first on Ja that was it; Ja would fold and it would seem like the flood gates were open.
Now I see all saying that JA can beat any team; guys please tell where this new found confidence came from. The standard was just to play Haiti and other weak teams. There is a lot to learn in order to play at the highest level. I'm sorry that the prof was given such a short time on his second stint. I hope Tappa get four years to mold locals with overseas and put a solid team out there next qualifiers.
Now I see all saying that JA can beat any team; guys please tell where this new found confidence came from. The standard was just to play Haiti and other weak teams. There is a lot to learn in order to play at the highest level. I'm sorry that the prof was given such a short time on his second stint. I hope Tappa get four years to mold locals with overseas and put a solid team out there next qualifiers.
Comment