Refs admits Title tilting mistake ....LAZIE !

[Lazie]

Are you suggesting then that the refs are trying to "make it up" to ManU?

And why didn't Ronaldo get a red for taking off his shirt after the headed goal? to bareback?... some yute (figget him name in the Championship?) score a boss free kick, rip off him yellow shirt to celebrate (revealing a yellow undershirt) and still get a red?

Yuh don't tink seh yuh team is favoured by the refs?.. yuh might have a one off bad call but overall ref fraid a Man U... or getting a kickback!

Where is the consistency?

The next point is ManU (Liverpool too) does NOT need a ref to help them... AND I may not be a football guru like you, but if you don't understand the psychology of sport I give you more credit than you deserve; Spurs in the situation they were became completed deflated and lost their focus when THE REF GAVE THE OPPOSITION A GOAL!!

Since when removing a shirt is a red card offense? The only consistency I see round here is overzealous Manu haters. Ref made a controversial call in Liverpool's game all a unuh quiet ... Ref made a controversial call in Manu's game and all of a sudden "ref fraid a Man U... or getting a kickback"? Mi cyaan tek unuh serious.

[Assasin]

"With the exception of the Loserpool crew"

Your word nuh count

[Lazie]

"With the exception of the Loserpool crew"

Your word nuh count

Only voice of reason pon the topic Sass.

[Peter R]

I only asked about consistency of reffing... so I'll give you that the yellow card is correct; however, my questions with respect to ManU and the refs really are based in Sir Alex's biatching that the refs are against his team when in reality the total opposite is true; and it doesn't only extend to the refs, the commentators are equally guilty of being ManU cheerleaders... just my observation.

And for you the ref's call is "controversial"... well, for others it's season-altering in a certain team's favour.

This is not to take anything away from your team's overall performance, but it is galling when unuh nuh need de help!

[Mosiah]

I don't know what crew that is, so I responded!

[Lazie]

I only asked about consistency of reffing... so I'll give you that the yellow card is correct; however, my questions with respect to ManU and the refs really are based in Sir Alex's biatching that the refs are against his team when in reality the total opposite is true; and it doesn't only extend to the refs, the commentators are equally guilty of being ManU cheerleaders... just my observation.

And for you the ref's call is "controversial"... well, for others it's season-altering in a certain team's favour.

This is not to take anything away from your team's overall performance, but it is galling when unuh nuh need de help!

If a call goes against Looserpool, Arsenal and any other team the managers all express this outrage, does that mean the refs are now in the pockets of those teams? Alex is no different bredren. Your side benefit from incorrect calls discuss that then talk bout the Empire.

[Peter R]

I am now convinced you read posts with ManU coloured glasses ONLY and are not the model of objectivity you try to make yourself... I quote from my post above for you...

"The next point is ManU (Liverpool too) does NOT need a ref to help them... AND I may not be a football guru like you, but if you don't understand the psychology of sport I give you more credit than you deserve; Spurs in the situation they were became completed deflated and lost their focus when THE REF GAVE THE OPPOSITION A GOAL!!"

It seems for you everything is about defending the Dumbpyre and not dealing with the issue of bad reffing at the most inopportune time...thanks.

[Lazie]

I am now convinced you read posts with ManU coloured glasses ONLY and are not the model of objectivity you try to make yourself... I quote from my post above for you...

"The next point is ManU (Liverpool too) does NOT need a ref to help them... AND I may not be a football guru like you, but if you don't understand the psychology of sport I give you more credit than you deserve; Spurs in the situation they were became completed deflated and lost their focus when THE REF GAVE THE OPPOSITION A GOAL!!"

It seems for you everything is about defending the Dumbpyre and not dealing with the issue of bad reffing at the most inopportune time...thanks.

A Looserpool fan questioning my objectivity? Now that a laugh. Twist and turn all yuh want Peter ... bad calls happen in the game. They have gone against Manu and now one guh their way y'all want to make a fuss? Yuh cyaan serious.

[Peter R]

I was ...right off the bat... or the boot if you prefer; never needed any replay to tell yuh seh de ref was in error.

[Peter R]

Is only Lazie objective on this site... like you, I don't know what crew that is.. is that, like a bunch of sailors?

[Karl]

Since when removing a shirt is a red card offense? The only consistency I see round here is overzealous Manu haters. Ref made a controversial call in Liverpool's game all a unuh quiet ... Ref made a controversial call in Manu's game and all of a sudden "ref fraid a Man U... or getting a kickback"? Mi cyaan tek unuh serious.

We can blame the Tottenham players for a mental breakdown after the unfortunate award of the penalty...but the BoyU supporters can kick puppa-lick all they want, the penalty was a game changer!

It was a shame the ref made such an error!

[Mosiah]

It's the same way with the JLP for Lazie. Unable to be objective or think for himself.

But him back broad!

[Lazie]

It's the same way with the JLP for Lazie. Unable to be objective or think for himself.

But him back broad!

Chelsea's biggest fan on Fox Football Fone-in pointed to the same things I've been saying. What him biased and cannot think for himself too? I have no problem with my objectivity. How many bad calls have gone against Manu? I never heard none of you bitching then? Wait .. all now you all silent of the phantom freekick that Liverpool got, but unuh waan point finger at Manu? Hypocrites.

[Farmah]

Lazie it was a BAD CALL period! I can appreciate that you are a diehard ManU fan and that you are probably clouded by your love of all things ManU {no feel no way it happen to me and Barca } but please take time out to be fair in your assessment of the penalty. I saw it for what it was the moment the ref blew it as a penalty. The fact is that it was a terrible lapse of judgment on the ref's part; it deflated the Tott's players and swung the momentum of the game in ManU's favour. Now, saying all of that does not mean I'm discounting ManU's effort on the day but had the penalty not been given, ManU could've had one of their worst Saturdays.

[Lazie]

Lazie it was a BAD CALL period! I can appreciate that you are a diehard ManU fan and that you are probably clouded by your love of all things ManU {no feel no way it happen to me and Barca } but please take time out to be fair in your assessment of the penalty. I saw it for what it was the moment the ref blew it as a penalty. The fact is that it was a terrible lapse of judgment on the ref's part, it deflated the Tott's players and swung the momentum of the game in ManU's favour. Now, saying all of that does not mean I'm discounting ManU's effort on the day but had the penalty not given, ManU could've had one of thier worst Saturdays.

Apparently you misunderstand my point. Anyway, was it a badcall that led to Liverpool's first goal?