RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Friedel's red card rescinded

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    [quote=Karl;156749]No there is no automatic red for a ref's error! The FA has not broken the rules. On facts of the game - the results stand.


    There is a "clear path" rule which states that if the attacking player is past the last defender and fouled on his way to goal it is an automatic red card offence.

    Torres was already past the last defender which is "clear path" to goal. Automatic redcard follows which means the referee was spot on.

    Comment


    • #47
      [quote=Warlord;157406]
      Originally posted by Karl View Post
      No there is no automatic red for a ref's error! The FA has not broken the rules. On facts of the game - the results stand.


      There is a "clear path" rule which states that if the attacking player is past the last defender and fouled on his way to goal it is an automatic red card offence.

      Torres was already past the last defender which is "clear path" to goal. Automatic redcard follows which means the referee was spot on.

      You do realise that Friedel was the last defender?
      "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Bricktop View Post
        Yes he took evasive action AFTER realizing Torres would beat him to the ball. If we both are running towards a fifty fifty ball, I beat you to the ball and flick it past you and my momentum carries me into you after I flick it past you then you will be called for a foul and rightly so
        Friedel was not running towards a ball!

        If I am stationary on the field and the ball runs towards me and you get to it before it arrives at my position and you after playing the ball run into me...you have committed a foul on me.

        Refs have to assume that you have the ability to reach a ball and not wishing to harm yourself by running into man or any other obstacle...or wishing to harm a fellow player....i.e. refs have to believe that players are capable of making an informed opinion on associated risks that a possible collusion would incur.

        Brickie: Do you go to football matches pre-disposed to thinking players are fools?
        "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Bricktop View Post
          If I push the ball through your legs and you stand up making no attempt to turn around and get the ball and I run into you that is a clear foul on your part. You were not making an attempt to win the ball and you blocked me from doing so. You cannot block someone from the ball if you aren't making an attempt to retrieve it yourself.

          It is not a foul!
          Pushing the ball through a player's legs demands you not run through the player. At all times players are not supposed to run through opponents or even players on the same team. It is a penal offence if deliberately done.

          Do it deliberately to your own teammate and the ref rules it thus you are supposed to be...you shall be punished.

          Yup! We see ref's making that wrong call too often...but it is wrong!
          Not everything you see called, is called correctly!
          "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

          Comment

          Working...
          X