Tweet
That is not practical and would violate the labor agreement with the union. Communistic approach....
-
Winning means you're willing to go longer, work harder, and give more than anyone else - Vince Lombardi -
Hortical, why would this not be practical? I agree it is drastic, but in the long run, it would be better for the players in the long run. Any labor agreement with unions can be changed and I would guarantee that the players association past players would have millions of case studies that would prove (e.g. John Barnes) that putting money away is a good idea. Also, it is not communistic if it is a condition of employment; no one is forcing anyone to play professional sport. The form and method of compensation between two parties is between them alone - in the olden days, pensions were standard fare. This is just a variation of that."H.L & Brick .....mi deh pan di wagon (Man City)" - X_____ http://www.reggaeboyzsc.com/forum1/showthread.php?p=378365&highlight=City+Liverpool#p ost378365
X DESCRIBES HIMSELF - Stop masquerading as if you have the clubs interest at heart, you are a fraud, always was and always will be in any and every thing that you present...Comment
-
Okay. So let them beg bread when they reach 50. Simple!
BLACK LIVES MATTERComment
Comment