RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

For all you referees out there. . .

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Mosiah View Post
    Okay! But you get my point. An inadevertent header means nothing happened and play continues.
    Yup!
    "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Tilla View Post
      Keith Hackett's official answers:
      1) Penalise the goalkeeper for handling the ball from a deliberate back-pass. His header outside the area makes no difference. Give an indirect free-kick from the point where the keeper handled it.

      2) Play on. But it's an immensely difficult situation. Intent is no longer in the laws of the game – so the fact that the defender did not intend to bring the defender down is irrelevant. Instead, the question you have to ask is whether the defender could have avoided the collision if he had taken more care – was it down to carelessness? If your answer was yes then you would give a direct free-kick or penalty, with a possible red card if an obvious goalscoring opportunity had been denied. But if the incident isn't down to carelessness, and is obviously a complete accident like this one, let play continue.

      3) The defenders are right – the laws state that, after treatment, an injured player must leave the field of play. It's unfortunate, and it has happened before, memorably to Thierry Henry at Arsenal a few years ago.
      Thanks!
      Next!
      "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

      Comment

      Working...
      X