England denied position in Premier League
By Tim Rich
Last Updated: 3:33pm GMT 22/11/2007
Have your say Read comments
Once more the wreckage is picked over, once more failure is analysed and once more the Football Association promises a thorough-going review of the English game.
McClaren plans swift return, Venables also sacked
FA back Barwick to find new England manager
Next England manager: The contenders
This morning at Soho Square, the FA did the easy bit, sacking Steve McClaren, a manager who proved painfully inadequate even for the relatively straightforward task of qualifying for the European Championship. A man who said he wanted to be judged on results and who, in 15 months, produced only one performance of note.
Mission impossible: Could Alan Shearer be the man to revitalise the England team
It was against Guus Hiddink's Russia, who almost made as big a hash of qualification as England, losing in Israel and then squeezing past Andorra with a 1-0 win. They were not as good as we thought they were but they were better than England.
The next bit was a little bit harder, sacking McClaren's assistant Terry Venables, and stifling the cries from well-worn sections of the media that he should be allowed to "rescue" England. Those supporters who had seen Venables attempt to "rescue" Portsmouth, Crystal Palace and Leeds United would be grateful for that. For once, Venables was not allowed to escape responsibility.
Bloodletting is easy, especially on mornings like Nov 22. The rest is far harder to come to terms with. There is a dearth of qualified English managers to replace McClaren - none has even the slightest experience of the Champions League. Of the candidates to succeed Sven-Goran Eriksson, Sam Allardyce and Alan Curbishley appear considerably weaker options than they were in 2006.
Only Martin O'Neill's credentials appear to have risen since the day the FA chief executive, Brian Barwick, confirmed that McClaren was "always my first choice" and any chairman who has tried to tempt O'Neill with employment will tell you that he is someone who agonises over his decisions.
And then there is Alan Shearer; a man with enormous presence, someone who might be what Jurgen Klinsmann and Marco van Basten were to Germany and Holland. But if Shearer fails, it will prompt Barwick's own resignation amid accusations of why he appointed someone who had not taken charge of a single competitive game to 'the impossible job'.
When England failed to qualify for a major tournament for the first time, the 1974 World Cup in West Germany, it was to be 16 years before they made a major impact in another tournament. They were humiliated in the European Championships of 1980 and 1988 and failed to qualify in 1984. They never made it to the Argentina World Cup, ran out of steam in Spain and lost to the first decent side they met in Mexico. Only in Italy in 1990 did England prove their worth. It might take as long to recover from this setback.
PM Brown wants home football championship
What is wrong with British football?
Match report: Croatia end England dream
A golden generation is fading and a quick study of the Under-21 side and the academy system reveals there is an awful lot of base metal coming up behind. Without a quota system that would probably be illegal under European Union legislation, the pool of English-qualified players in the Premier League that now stands at around 70 will dry up still further.
Unless the Premier League can be cajoled into abandoning naked self-interest in the appointment of its managers and the buying up of young talent from Europe and Africa as a substitute for youth development, the national game will continue to corrode.
It is one thing asking for "root and branch reform" as the FA chairman, Geoff Thompson, did this morning, it is quite another asking why Manchester United, Arsenal, Chelsea and Liverpool have not produced a single regular England player from their academies in the last five years?
The Premier League is the most profitable in the world, it is not an organisation that will abandon the Nanis and Andersons while concentrating on developing the Kieran Richardsons and Wes Browns.
The Football Association was an enthusiastic backer of the Premier League when it was launched in the wake of England's failure to make the knockout stages of the 1992 European Championship. It knew it would break the power of the Football League and make rich clubs richer - a process that would supposedly encourage greater success in the newly-formed Champions League. The FA sowed the wind of this great revolution in English football and this morning it is buffeted by a whirlwind of its own creation.
Have your say
Post this story to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
External links
The Football Association
Croatian Football Federation (available in English)
Uefa Euro 2008
Comments
Why can't we have a great team as in the Good Old Days:Stan Matthews,Wilf Mannion,Tommy Lawton, Tom Finney, Billy Wright, Bert Williams...hang on, we DID! In the 1950 World Cup in Brazil:lost 2-0 to Spain and 1-0 to the USA! Plus ca change!
Posted by david clayton on November 22, 2007 4:35 PM
Report this comment
I think we are all starting to agree that it is the FA themselves that are at the core of the issue. Who will call them to account? Is anybody brave enough!?
Posted by Dogboy on November 22, 2007 4:21 PM
Report this comment
What was it they described the Premier League as on Top Gear last Sunday?
Ah yes ... "The Andrex League".
Too soft, and far too expensive.
Posted by KevintheB on November 22, 2007 3:59 PM
Report this comment
Why not ask all those foreign Chelsea/Arsenal/Manchester/Liverpool-players to play for the Englisch national team? That would be consistent.
Posted by Arturo on November 22, 2007 3:57 PM
Report this comment
mcquirk:
You don't agree? On what?
If you don't mind all those foreign players, then be consistent and ask all those foreign Arsenal/Chelsea/Manchesterplayers to play for the national team.
Posted by Arturo on November 22, 2007 3:53 PM
Report this comment
"it is not an organisation that will abandon the Nanis and Andersons while concentrating on developing the Kieran Richardsons and Wes Browns"
What do you mean here? I can't understand the text? Because, as far as I can see, Nani and Anderson are brand new to the game (United) whereas Brown is already successful (and would have made a difference last night) and Richardson was given chance after chance after chance at United, but wasn't up to it.
Posted by Mario on November 22, 2007 3:51 PM
Report this comment
Why does everyone keep banging on about the number of foreign players affecting the national game. How many foreign players played in England when they failed to for the World Cup in 1994? The fact that England have failed to qualify for another maor tournament is down to the FA failing to select someone capable of managing England and the players failing to live up to the reputations they have and the potential they posess. It maybe a case that the players England have simply aren't good enough, but to be honest I do not belive that is true. In players such as Gerrard, Rooney, Owen and Terry, England have players of world class POTENTIAL, but that is different to players of world class. While they can all produce the magic occasionally the genuine world class players produce it on a near weekly basis, that is something that all these players need to aspire to do. With the right manager, such as Jose Mourinho, I am sure these players will be able to achieve the world class potential when the put on the England shirt.
Posted by Rhy on November 22, 2007 3:51 PM
Report this comment
"If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster
And treat those two impostors just the same"
........you're probably not an English football fan.
Posted by John Blackley on November 22, 2007 3:47 PM
Report this comment
In the past few years I've found it hard to understand why English fans - who always struck me as very chauvinistic - didn't mind that their major teams were built around or even completely consisted of foreign players. Especially because there used to be such a tradition of teams that were built around 'native' or even local players.
Posted by Arturo on November 22, 2007 3:46 PM
Report this comment
I don't agree. We had no influx of foreign players in the league in 74 but still failed to make the world cup. It seems everyone is intent on blaming the amount of foreign players for our failure but we still have enough quality players to preform under good management. No disrespect to Croatia as they are way ahead of us but their national league is probably weaker than our 2nd division (CCC) and they still produce a quality national side.
Rooney, Gerrard, Lampard, Cole, Richards, Ferdinand, Beckham, Wright Phillips etc are all technically good quality players.. if you can't make a good side from those players its just bad management, which starts with the FA and coaching staff.
The FA is a stuffy, old fashioned, organisation thats way out of touch with modern football. Thats the biggest problem.
Posted by mcguirk on November 22, 2007 3:38 PM
Report this comment
I personaly could not give a toss for our football players. They are not interested in performing for their country, it's all about celebrity status and money. These over paid twerps have never done a hard days work in their pathetic little lives.
I'm glad England are out of the Euro championships, we don't deserve to be there.
As for the FA, much like the EU they are a bunch of useless, insignificant fools.
Posted by NickJD on November 22, 2007 3:30 PM
Report this comment
Look at the Scotland squad. Look at the N. Ireland squad. Scotland would have qualified from England's group. It's not the talent of the players, or the number of foreigners in the Premier League. It's about having a poor manager, a media feeding frenzy who have no sense of perspective, and a group of players who diminish when they put on an England jersey.
Posted by Brian from Dublin on November 22, 2007 3:29 PM
Report this comment
AAAAARRGH!! Stop it please! Stop going on about the premiership ruining English football. Why can't young English footballers learn from the fantastic imports? Maybe because we have a pathetic attitude as a country to sport in our schools. We are paying out billions of pounds for a one off event in 2012 the money for which could improve every football facility in the whole country. I imagine premiership managers do not include english players in their sides because they are not as good as overseas players not because there is a conspiracy to ruin English football. The talent England have had available over the last four years has been amazing and totally underachieving. That we didn't win the last world cup with the players available was ridiculous. Maybe now the FA can concentrate next summer on building up from scholls and clubs instead of going on jollies with free tickets to the championships. Sorry but lay off the make up of the premiership - the envy of the world.
Posted by st George on November 22, 2007 3:29 PM
Report this comment
It's time to boycott Sky Sports and Setanta until the FA hierarchy is removed.
After 15 years of the Premiership new talent should be breaking through, it's not. The money has been wasted, players are happy to pick up wages and no longer play ie Sidwell at Chelsea is it any wonder we can't produce a team that can qualify for a tournament.
The FA are inept and yet the press doesn't hound them like they do the England manager.
Ultimately they are responsible and it's time for them to go.
Posted by Matt on November 22, 2007 3:17 PM
Report this comment
By Tim Rich
Last Updated: 3:33pm GMT 22/11/2007
Have your say Read comments
Once more the wreckage is picked over, once more failure is analysed and once more the Football Association promises a thorough-going review of the English game.
McClaren plans swift return, Venables also sacked
FA back Barwick to find new England manager
Next England manager: The contenders
This morning at Soho Square, the FA did the easy bit, sacking Steve McClaren, a manager who proved painfully inadequate even for the relatively straightforward task of qualifying for the European Championship. A man who said he wanted to be judged on results and who, in 15 months, produced only one performance of note.
Mission impossible: Could Alan Shearer be the man to revitalise the England team
It was against Guus Hiddink's Russia, who almost made as big a hash of qualification as England, losing in Israel and then squeezing past Andorra with a 1-0 win. They were not as good as we thought they were but they were better than England.
The next bit was a little bit harder, sacking McClaren's assistant Terry Venables, and stifling the cries from well-worn sections of the media that he should be allowed to "rescue" England. Those supporters who had seen Venables attempt to "rescue" Portsmouth, Crystal Palace and Leeds United would be grateful for that. For once, Venables was not allowed to escape responsibility.
Bloodletting is easy, especially on mornings like Nov 22. The rest is far harder to come to terms with. There is a dearth of qualified English managers to replace McClaren - none has even the slightest experience of the Champions League. Of the candidates to succeed Sven-Goran Eriksson, Sam Allardyce and Alan Curbishley appear considerably weaker options than they were in 2006.
Only Martin O'Neill's credentials appear to have risen since the day the FA chief executive, Brian Barwick, confirmed that McClaren was "always my first choice" and any chairman who has tried to tempt O'Neill with employment will tell you that he is someone who agonises over his decisions.
And then there is Alan Shearer; a man with enormous presence, someone who might be what Jurgen Klinsmann and Marco van Basten were to Germany and Holland. But if Shearer fails, it will prompt Barwick's own resignation amid accusations of why he appointed someone who had not taken charge of a single competitive game to 'the impossible job'.
When England failed to qualify for a major tournament for the first time, the 1974 World Cup in West Germany, it was to be 16 years before they made a major impact in another tournament. They were humiliated in the European Championships of 1980 and 1988 and failed to qualify in 1984. They never made it to the Argentina World Cup, ran out of steam in Spain and lost to the first decent side they met in Mexico. Only in Italy in 1990 did England prove their worth. It might take as long to recover from this setback.
PM Brown wants home football championship
What is wrong with British football?
Match report: Croatia end England dream
A golden generation is fading and a quick study of the Under-21 side and the academy system reveals there is an awful lot of base metal coming up behind. Without a quota system that would probably be illegal under European Union legislation, the pool of English-qualified players in the Premier League that now stands at around 70 will dry up still further.
Unless the Premier League can be cajoled into abandoning naked self-interest in the appointment of its managers and the buying up of young talent from Europe and Africa as a substitute for youth development, the national game will continue to corrode.
It is one thing asking for "root and branch reform" as the FA chairman, Geoff Thompson, did this morning, it is quite another asking why Manchester United, Arsenal, Chelsea and Liverpool have not produced a single regular England player from their academies in the last five years?
The Premier League is the most profitable in the world, it is not an organisation that will abandon the Nanis and Andersons while concentrating on developing the Kieran Richardsons and Wes Browns.
The Football Association was an enthusiastic backer of the Premier League when it was launched in the wake of England's failure to make the knockout stages of the 1992 European Championship. It knew it would break the power of the Football League and make rich clubs richer - a process that would supposedly encourage greater success in the newly-formed Champions League. The FA sowed the wind of this great revolution in English football and this morning it is buffeted by a whirlwind of its own creation.
Have your say
Post this story to: del.icio.us | Digg | Newsvine | NowPublic | Reddit
External links
The Football Association
Croatian Football Federation (available in English)
Uefa Euro 2008
Comments
Why can't we have a great team as in the Good Old Days:Stan Matthews,Wilf Mannion,Tommy Lawton, Tom Finney, Billy Wright, Bert Williams...hang on, we DID! In the 1950 World Cup in Brazil:lost 2-0 to Spain and 1-0 to the USA! Plus ca change!
Posted by david clayton on November 22, 2007 4:35 PM
Report this comment
I think we are all starting to agree that it is the FA themselves that are at the core of the issue. Who will call them to account? Is anybody brave enough!?
Posted by Dogboy on November 22, 2007 4:21 PM
Report this comment
What was it they described the Premier League as on Top Gear last Sunday?
Ah yes ... "The Andrex League".
Too soft, and far too expensive.
Posted by KevintheB on November 22, 2007 3:59 PM
Report this comment
Why not ask all those foreign Chelsea/Arsenal/Manchester/Liverpool-players to play for the Englisch national team? That would be consistent.
Posted by Arturo on November 22, 2007 3:57 PM
Report this comment
mcquirk:
You don't agree? On what?
If you don't mind all those foreign players, then be consistent and ask all those foreign Arsenal/Chelsea/Manchesterplayers to play for the national team.
Posted by Arturo on November 22, 2007 3:53 PM
Report this comment
"it is not an organisation that will abandon the Nanis and Andersons while concentrating on developing the Kieran Richardsons and Wes Browns"
What do you mean here? I can't understand the text? Because, as far as I can see, Nani and Anderson are brand new to the game (United) whereas Brown is already successful (and would have made a difference last night) and Richardson was given chance after chance after chance at United, but wasn't up to it.
Posted by Mario on November 22, 2007 3:51 PM
Report this comment
Why does everyone keep banging on about the number of foreign players affecting the national game. How many foreign players played in England when they failed to for the World Cup in 1994? The fact that England have failed to qualify for another maor tournament is down to the FA failing to select someone capable of managing England and the players failing to live up to the reputations they have and the potential they posess. It maybe a case that the players England have simply aren't good enough, but to be honest I do not belive that is true. In players such as Gerrard, Rooney, Owen and Terry, England have players of world class POTENTIAL, but that is different to players of world class. While they can all produce the magic occasionally the genuine world class players produce it on a near weekly basis, that is something that all these players need to aspire to do. With the right manager, such as Jose Mourinho, I am sure these players will be able to achieve the world class potential when the put on the England shirt.
Posted by Rhy on November 22, 2007 3:51 PM
Report this comment
"If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster
And treat those two impostors just the same"
........you're probably not an English football fan.
Posted by John Blackley on November 22, 2007 3:47 PM
Report this comment
In the past few years I've found it hard to understand why English fans - who always struck me as very chauvinistic - didn't mind that their major teams were built around or even completely consisted of foreign players. Especially because there used to be such a tradition of teams that were built around 'native' or even local players.
Posted by Arturo on November 22, 2007 3:46 PM
Report this comment
I don't agree. We had no influx of foreign players in the league in 74 but still failed to make the world cup. It seems everyone is intent on blaming the amount of foreign players for our failure but we still have enough quality players to preform under good management. No disrespect to Croatia as they are way ahead of us but their national league is probably weaker than our 2nd division (CCC) and they still produce a quality national side.
Rooney, Gerrard, Lampard, Cole, Richards, Ferdinand, Beckham, Wright Phillips etc are all technically good quality players.. if you can't make a good side from those players its just bad management, which starts with the FA and coaching staff.
The FA is a stuffy, old fashioned, organisation thats way out of touch with modern football. Thats the biggest problem.
Posted by mcguirk on November 22, 2007 3:38 PM
Report this comment
I personaly could not give a toss for our football players. They are not interested in performing for their country, it's all about celebrity status and money. These over paid twerps have never done a hard days work in their pathetic little lives.
I'm glad England are out of the Euro championships, we don't deserve to be there.
As for the FA, much like the EU they are a bunch of useless, insignificant fools.
Posted by NickJD on November 22, 2007 3:30 PM
Report this comment
Look at the Scotland squad. Look at the N. Ireland squad. Scotland would have qualified from England's group. It's not the talent of the players, or the number of foreigners in the Premier League. It's about having a poor manager, a media feeding frenzy who have no sense of perspective, and a group of players who diminish when they put on an England jersey.
Posted by Brian from Dublin on November 22, 2007 3:29 PM
Report this comment
AAAAARRGH!! Stop it please! Stop going on about the premiership ruining English football. Why can't young English footballers learn from the fantastic imports? Maybe because we have a pathetic attitude as a country to sport in our schools. We are paying out billions of pounds for a one off event in 2012 the money for which could improve every football facility in the whole country. I imagine premiership managers do not include english players in their sides because they are not as good as overseas players not because there is a conspiracy to ruin English football. The talent England have had available over the last four years has been amazing and totally underachieving. That we didn't win the last world cup with the players available was ridiculous. Maybe now the FA can concentrate next summer on building up from scholls and clubs instead of going on jollies with free tickets to the championships. Sorry but lay off the make up of the premiership - the envy of the world.
Posted by st George on November 22, 2007 3:29 PM
Report this comment
It's time to boycott Sky Sports and Setanta until the FA hierarchy is removed.
After 15 years of the Premiership new talent should be breaking through, it's not. The money has been wasted, players are happy to pick up wages and no longer play ie Sidwell at Chelsea is it any wonder we can't produce a team that can qualify for a tournament.
The FA are inept and yet the press doesn't hound them like they do the England manager.
Ultimately they are responsible and it's time for them to go.
Posted by Matt on November 22, 2007 3:17 PM
Report this comment
Comment