OJ re the mistake you made re the removal of the turf at Catherine Hall that was made into a political football by Clive Mullings.
First things first the Catherine Hall stadium's turf is grown on a bed of some synthetic material along with sand and dirt etc and grown on pallets that can be taken up and replanted elsewhere and if dont properly the grass grows back in little or no time.
The field at the national stadium was tough and even our own overseas based players used to complain about playing on it.
At the time the Cathertine Hall field was not being used by anyone and thus taking the sod from there to Kingston was in fact helping both facilities.
First it provided a much better surface for out football teams to play on and also it helped the Catherine Hall as the inactivity there caused the grass roots to growth thicker and choke the growth.
I keep asking those who were protesting the removal, that aside from the silly country vs town arguments that are stale, who was being denied the use of the field when the sod was removed???
First things first the Catherine Hall stadium's turf is grown on a bed of some synthetic material along with sand and dirt etc and grown on pallets that can be taken up and replanted elsewhere and if dont properly the grass grows back in little or no time.
The field at the national stadium was tough and even our own overseas based players used to complain about playing on it.
At the time the Cathertine Hall field was not being used by anyone and thus taking the sod from there to Kingston was in fact helping both facilities.
First it provided a much better surface for out football teams to play on and also it helped the Catherine Hall as the inactivity there caused the grass roots to growth thicker and choke the growth.
I keep asking those who were protesting the removal, that aside from the silly country vs town arguments that are stale, who was being denied the use of the field when the sod was removed???
Comment