That wasn't a red

[Bricktop]

foolishness.

[Seuss]

In the replay the guy had skipped the tackle and chose to stomp Thomas. Excellent call by the ref.

[Bricktop]

In the replay the guy had skipped the tackle and chose to stomp Thomas. Excellent call by the ref.

So if he skipped the tackle and is in the air where is he supposed to land?

[Tilla]

BT, he skipped, but he seem to go doen intentionally on the man's leg with both feet. That is why the referee saw it as dangerous play and in his estimation worthy of a red card.

[Hortical]

That was a red, and he deliberately landed on the leg.

[Bricktop]

BT, he skipped, but he seem to go doen intentionally on the man's leg with both feet. That is why the referee saw it as dangerous play and in his estimation worthy of a red card.

I never see it that way at all. It loooked to me that he came down softly on the player not like he stamped down on him. He was in the air unless he can levitate I don't see what else he coulda done.

[Bricktop]

That was a red, and he deliberately landed on the leg.

Where else could he have landed?

[Tilla]

Sorry, but I saw it like the referee.

[Scaly Spurs]

I never see it that way at all. It loooked to me that he came down softly on the player not like he stamped down on him. He was in the air unless he can levitate I don't see what else he coulda done.

BT fi a man who play ball I find hard to belive that u see it that way, he could easily have opened his legs to avoid stepping on the man. He didn't even attempt to avoid him.

[Tilla]

BT, the FIFA rules says that if in the estimation of the referee the play is dangerous, then it is up to the referee to make the decision. The referee feels it was red so. . .

[myYout]

Dat nuh even dangerous it malicious; him nah tackle fi nutten. Straight red, ah easy ting dat.