Is Jaheel Hyde the best hurdler ever?

[Don1]

Hyde's height is my only concern and the only thing that could interrupt his sprint to super greatness.

How tall is he, Willi? .

Hmmmm

Is this why your success was cut short at Class 3?

[Mosiah]

Hmmmm

Is this why your success was cut short at Class 3?

We've covered this in the past already. And I've already had my therapy sessions. Do you have any more questions?!

[Willi]

The 400mH is called the MAN-killer event. Do I need say more?

You are asking a shortish yute to go to the senior level and try to dominate 110mH and 400mH on the killer schedule and YOU think me a tek people fi eediat.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahah.

Say hello to Alice for me, down there in Wonderland!

[Sickko]

Jason Richards is the Yankee with the locks who looks like David Riley the Excelsior coach, had a couple of good seasons and won a global gold. It will be very hard for anyone to try and double in the 110m and 400m hurdles at the same global championships, might work at Champs but cant see it working at the next level

[Assasin]

We know the reality but he might turn out to be superman.

[Don1]

We've covered this in the past already. And I've already had my therapy sessions. Do you have any more questions?!

Apologies for my shortsightedness

[Karl]

Hyde's height is my only concern and the only thing that could interrupt his sprint to super greatness.

How tall is he, Willi? Do you know?

What I do know is he would not have to put on 6 inches. He's at least 5'-10" now and if he gets to even 6', he'll be good enough to compete at the highest level.

At the senior level, do we wish for him the ability of being only able to complete?

I can see where in football only able to compete makes him a multi-millionaire! ...not so on the track? In track, the chances are that being 'only able to compete' means he ends up a pauper.

[Mosiah]

You missed "at the highest level"?

By that I meant competing for gold medals at every global meet, not just making it to the finals.

And, lest we forget, I've already concurred that football would be a better bet, but only if he leaves NOW for a good European club.

[Willi]

Football is too risky…I am not sure he would be considered good enough…Is not like he dominated Manning Cup/D Cup like Morgan or Dias, or Ali Rose or Bibi or Blakey, or Dago or Skill, or Juicy , or Woodstock, or Teacher or...

[Karl]

Football is too risky…I am not sure he would be considered good enough…Is not like he dominated Manning Cup/D Cup like Morgan or Dias, or Ali Rose or Bibi or Blakey, or Dago or Skill, or Juicy , or Woodstock, or Teacher or...

You cannot mention Dias or Dago in the same sentence as Skill. Dias was a poor imitation of Dago...but for all that they did they never played football. Skill higher skill level...but the difference was Skill played football. He was a consumate TEAM man in the way he used his brain to manage his skills for the benefit of his TEAM and naturally his TEAMmates. Dias and Dago could be said to have taken advantage of players with lesser skills by out
'skilling' (If you get what I mean?) them but won matches more by the poor quality of the players and TEAMs faced. ...not through use of 'brain power'.

Lennie was just a cut above Dago in terms of TEAMplay. Great for the fans who came to matches only to see 'bruks'...but not good for a quality TEAM.

Bibi was a different player to Dago and Dias. Smarter and TEAM oriented. TEAM through and through.

Morgan? Which Morgan is that? The young player touted as our next start on which there is nary a word? ...or the guy who played with Maurice Foster and Micky West?

We must face facts that as far as TEAM play was concerned the 'Great Clarendon TEAMs of 1976/76...the Vere dynasty of Deryck Tomlinson were **** poor TEAMs in a n ear where the opponents were even more awful as TEAM and had individual players less committed and with lower levels of individual skill.

The StGC TEAMs of 1958 & 1959 and the KC TEAMs of 1964 & 1965 were TEAMs!!!

JC also had some good TEAMs during a time when Bradley Stewart was the coach. Never won a title if memory serves me right but good TEAM play.

Even the 'great Cornwall TEAM' (1958 or 1959 - Shared Olivier Shield with StGC - I think?) with I think Aggate(?) and Brown as backs, 'Trafficator" Cooke at center-half and director of traffic and George D (Davidson) and the very young "Billy" G (Griffith) upfront was **** poor as TEAM...but had great athletes and never say die effort and belief!!! The STGC TEAM - TEAM of Dynamite Lyn and the rest - was far superior on TEAM play but had players who could not match the Cornwall players as athletes.

...as to my 60s Munro D'Cup Champions?
We were proud of our 'tons' half-back and backs! There was something heady and exhilarating about watching those half-backs and backs either running through the opponent or the 'lightweight' opponents bouncing off each of those players...the mightly boot upfield - Sam Allardyce of the EPL would have been in seventh heaven if he had lead those TEAMs - and the chase and 'ramming away' of the ball by Tony Lanchaster and later Givans. We must have won a zillion matches by 1 - 0! Stuff that had the heart pumping and the dining room buzzing as we graciously cheered the losers and lifted the rafters for our lads ...but as TEAM the attitude was great, the one-for-all and all for one was magnificent...but putting more than 2 passes together would have been asking too much! Great days! ...but crap football yet we won matches and titles!!!

[Willi]

Simple, all those ballers I called dominated the Manning and D-Cups.

here can be no discussions, as its straight fact.

I was not comparing them other than the simple fact that they dominated.

[Karl]

Simple, all those ballers I called dominated the Manning and D-Cups.

here can be no discussions, as its straight fact.

I was not comparing them other than the simple fact that they dominated.

OK!
...and you are on point - They all were top schoolboy players.